"And as you can see here, Mark Zuckerberg has bought a controlling share in even these systems. At this point the Federation can't even make a boob joke without risking a one-week vacation from using subspace radio."
I hope the next Trek show has a 100 black, female lesbian cast. I can hear the screams of horror from granny's basement at the thoughtI think with all the lgbtq characters in Star Trek now it's ok to leave Kirk a heterosexual. Chapel now being a bisexual doesn't mean every tos character has to be. How much representation does anyone group need these days to feel represented?
Unless the numbers are not sequential.Huh. Starbase 234 is already on the map. I thought it'd be constructed much later, given the number.
Absolutely, though I'd like to know what they're based on, then.Unless the numbers are not sequential.
Perhaps certain sectors are grouped in to larger units and then numbered, so the leading number indicates the sector group then the base number.Absolutely, though I'd like to know what they're based on, then.
Huh. Starbase 234 is already on the map. I thought it'd be constructed much later, given the number.
Gregory Peck's shadow is all over Trek despite him not actually ever showing up in a Trek show/film, from his buddy Brock Peters being both Admiral Cartwright and Joseph Sisko to now his grandson Ethan being Spock.
I can't wait for the requisite court room episode.That Peck voice goes far in the filmmaking industry.![]()
"To Kill A Mocking Tribble"I can't wait for the requisite court room episode.
Because I found the worry for the idea of Kirk being not 100% straight to be a very silly idea. I even say you can be straight and still have had attraction to or even sex with the same gender. It's like someone holding Kirk's sexuality as some sort of precious gemstone, and any minor deviation ruins it for them. I got the image of Gollum from The Lord of the Rings affectionately caressing Kirk's sexuality. What a sexuality looks like I don't know.It's not the caps I was refering to. Nothing in the quoted text had caps. I was refering to your use of "precious heterosexuality.". It had an air of disdain to it.
Right, that's what I called hostile. I have no idea why the idea that Kirk is simply straight to is so offensive.It's like someone holding Kirk's sexuality as some sort of precious gemstone
Why is the idea that he's not (which is really much more likely, given Gene's fascination with a future full of sexual freedom) so troublesome? It's never explicitly stated one way or the other, so why insist that it must be one way when the only evidence to lean on for that is present-day sexual mores?Right, that's what I called hostile. I have no idea why the idea that Kirk is simply straight to be so offensive.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.