Thing is, Titanic is about the main event.Never watch a Titanic movie![]()
Whereas a prequel is playing out all sorts of side-quests that the audience knows must not contradict the main event.
Thing is, Titanic is about the main event.Never watch a Titanic movie![]()
I have no idea why they cast an actor that much older than the character unless they're seriously considering going into the TOS movie timeframe (and to be fair there's a lot of room after TMP to explore)
There really showings Pikes .. Aggressiveness? He knows he'll survive for another 10 years, so he's being quite reckless.. I'm on the enterprise, I survive, so the enterprise will survive whatever completly insane scheme we do... Reckless.
Update: I was right! https://twitter.com/gaghyogi49/status/1530225106181664769?t=WzHWFFKj8X3WclWFqZVfWg&s=19I like to imagine Pike was wearing a Discovery remembrance pin.
You were right you imagined it?
I imagine soYou were right you imagined it?![]()
Whereas a prequel is playing out all sorts of side-quests that the audience knows must not contradict the main event.
wasnt discovery’s existence totally expunged from all records, though?
No. It was reported as lost with all hands. The exact nature of the mission was classified.wasnt discovery’s existence totally expunged from all records, though?
As a TMP fan I still hate it when they warp out and the impulse engines aren't shut off. :P
The ENTIRE design of this series is heavily based on TOS; moreso than any other series since the 70s. If they don't like it they have a funny way of showing it.
Of COURSE it's not an exact reproduction of the TOS sets. That'd be silly. Only die-hard fans could possibly care about this. Let's move on.
So wait - Chapel was wearing a Farragut pin. This is interesting to me. That was Lieutenant Kirk's ship. They were attacked by the space vampire cloud thingy and lost a lot of people, including Captain Garrovick, but they didn't lose the whole ship. I'm curious if the remembrance pins simply imply the loss of personnel on a specific vessel, not all hands and the vessel itself (like Discovery). And was that the FJ NCC-1702 version (non-canonical, that was listed as "destroyed") or the Greg Jein/Doug Drexler NCC-1647 version? MA says, "The Technical Manual also listed the vessel as being destroyed, as does The Making of Star Trek, although there was no canon evidence supporting that assertion."
Oh noes! *clutches TOS VHSs to protect them from rewriting!*I like the show I just think they are planning in rewriting TOS after the Pike missions.
Which part?They're not.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.