• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Strange New Worlds 1x04 - "Memento Mori"

Hit it!


  • Total voters
    219
I have no idea why they cast an actor that much older than the character unless they're seriously considering going into the TOS movie timeframe (and to be fair there's a lot of room after TMP to explore)

Or perhaps because he just LOOKS age appropriate? I don't see why a new actor has to be the same age.
 
There really showings Pikes .. Aggressiveness? He knows he'll survive for another 10 years, so he's being quite reckless.. I'm on the enterprise, I survive, so the enterprise will survive whatever completly insane scheme we do... Reckless.

I didn't think he was being aggressive. They didn't have a lot of options, did they? It's not reckless to take the only action that offers a chance of survival. That was one aspect of the ep I found poignant and kind of cool. He realizes -knows- the ship will make it because he is on the ship and this isn't his time. He doesn't know who will die as a result of this desperate act. (And people do and he mourns the losses.) He's also making a reasoned choice based on the information he's been provided by his team. Kirk would have done the same.
 
I can know I'll die in 10 years and still act very aggressively and impulsively in the moment. Human behavior isn't always a predictable thing and I like that he's still being reckless and feeling as if his life is on the line even if we know it isn't.
 
Whereas a prequel is playing out all sorts of side-quests that the audience knows must not contradict the main event.

Not really.

There are additional layers of meaning to the character stories in these Titanic productions precisely because we know what they do not about what's coming. It's simply a different kind of tool for creating suspense than the simpler "let's keep the audience guessing."

The same's true for a so-called prequel like SNW. And really, in no way are the stories we're seeing now less important than or somehow preparatory to the stories we saw in TOS. They're just as important.


You're going to die. It's an absolute certainty and there's nothing you can do about it. Other people will be born and will die after you, and they won't know anything about you.
 
Last edited:
The ENTIRE design of this series is heavily based on TOS; moreso than any other series since the 70s. If they don't like it they have a funny way of showing it.

Of COURSE it's not an exact reproduction of the TOS sets. That'd be silly. Only die-hard fans could possibly care about this. Let's move on.

I like the show I just think they are planning in rewriting TOS after the Pike missions.
 
So wait - Chapel was wearing a Farragut pin. This is interesting to me. That was Lieutenant Kirk's ship. They were attacked by the space vampire cloud thingy and lost a lot of people, including Captain Garrovick, but they didn't lose the whole ship. I'm curious if the remembrance pins simply imply the loss of personnel on a specific vessel, not all hands and the vessel itself (like Discovery). And was that the FJ NCC-1702 version (non-canonical, that was listed as "destroyed") or the Greg Jein/Doug Drexler NCC-1647 version? MA says, "The Technical Manual also listed the vessel as being destroyed, as does The Making of Star Trek, although there was no canon evidence supporting that assertion."

Also curious about Spock's Kongo pin. Is that the FJ USS Kongo (NCC-1710) that has been considered quasi-canonical, or the Jein NCC-1732 version? Canonically, Kongo-1710 (ostensibly another refit from an original TOS Connie w/ the FJ registry) was shown on the "Operation Retrieve" charts in TUC.

And why all the seemingly unnecessary re-writing of Connie registry numbers by newer production staff? Was this a continued post-Roddenberrian attempt at discrediting Schaubeldt's work?

These pins really are quite interesting to me. Really hoping we get to see some close-up's of them in the near future (I detect a new limited collectible series from Eaglemoss).
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top