• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Short Treks 1x02 - "Calypso"

Rate the short…


  • Total voters
    155
The design was the same, but the colour appeared to be different. It's has rust coloured highlights instead of red.

unknown.png
man that CGI launch bay is so much more convincing this season than it was in season one.
 
But they clearly do not have them in the TOS era, and early Next Gen explicitly makes them a new and amazing invention.
So?

TOS and TNG treated the Soviet Union like it was still an existing political entity in the 23rd and 24th centuries, because at the time it still existed in our world. We can either take the convoluted route that a reformed USSR pops up again in the future or we can just adapt with the changing realities of the world and disregard those references in favor of saying the USSR no longer exists by then.

Likewise, we can learn to be more flexible and accepting of the fact that our technology today is rapidly catching up with or surpassing many of the smaller technologies on TOS and TNG (but the big stuff that really matters are still mostly pie in the sky) and adapt the depiction of the tech to fit our current reality, while subtly bumping up the tech level of the subsequent series and movies.

Just imagine that the holodecks in TNG still represented a major leap forward in the technology level of holograms over the TOS-era without sweating the details.
 
Last edited:
The whole point of Star Trek was that you could tell any kind of story you want, and bring it into the Star Trek universe. If it's a story worth telling, find a way to tell it.
I'm not sure anyone can quite definitively say what the point of Star Trek is. I imagine that boils down to the person.

All I'm saying is that this story is likely going to exist outside of the shows lore and will just as likely never be brought up again....I guess I also brought up that it does strangely stand out from the rest of the shorts which is strictly related to Discovery.
 
Citations needed.

-MMoM:D
Riker's amazement at stepping onto the holodeck in "Farpoint". Explicit dialogue in VOY: "Flashback".
So?

TOS and TNG treated the Soviet Union like it was still an existing political entity in the 23rd and 24th centuries, because at the time it still existed in our world. We can either take the convoluted route that a reformed USSR pops up again in the future or we can just adapt with the changing realities of the world and disregard those references in favor of saying the USSR no longer exists by then.

Likewise, we can learn to be more flexible and accepting of the fact that our technology today is rapidly catching up with or surpassing many of the smaller technologies on TOS and TNG (but the big stuff that really matters are still mostly pie in the sky) and adapt the depiction of the tech to fit our current reality, while subtly bumping up the tech level of the subsequent series and movies.

Just imagine that the holodecks in TNG still represented a major leap forward in the technology level of holograms over the TOS-era without sweating the details.
Real life =/= Star Trek. You can either retcon everything to the point the original barely exists except as a vague outline where nothing looks, sounds or happened as originally depicted (which is what they have done) or just say it's a separate version of Trek, which I believe infinitely more sensible..
 
So?

TOS and TNG treated the Soviet Union like it was still an existing political entity in the 23rd and 24th centuries, because at the time it still existed in our world. We can either take the convoluted route that a reformed USSR pops up again in the future or we can just adapt with the changing realities of the world and disregard those references in favor of saying the USSR no longer exists by then.
One could argue that is is much easier to look past those things (a screenshot of the computer screen and a screen grab of a dedication plaque) than an entire episode or set of episodes. Also looking at the world around us today I don't think it's that convoluted to imagine the USSR coming back again at some point. Kind of feels like anything could happen these days.
 
Until Trek is listed as a documentary, it's always about a possible future.

You know what I mean. It's a possible future in-universe.

Assuming it really is the future. Aside from Zora, there's not a lot of proof of that, is there?

And I hate to keep bringing this up...but does that really look like a thousand-year-old ship? ;)

Also looking at the world around us today I don't think it's that convoluted to imagine the USSR coming back again at some point.

Russia under Vladimir Putin is basically the Soviet Union all over again. All that's missing is the name.
 
Last edited:
"I didn't believe these simulations could be this real."


"In the twenty-third century, holographic imaging resolution was less accurate."

-MMoM:D
Seemed pretty accurate when showing mirrors of Burnham and Tilly.
It was 1000 years later, we don't know how the ship was upgraded before she was abandoned.
Possible, although everything looks the same (which is going to limit them quite a bit with regard to set design changes etc, but that's another discussion)
 
Trek depicts what started out as a "might yet be" future, and has moved to being a "might have been, and parts of it are things we can still reach for" future.

I'm okay with that.

Back to our discussion of the episode at hand...
 
Real life =/= Star Trek. You can either retcon everything to the point the original barely exists except as a vague outline where nothing looks, sounds or happened as originally depicted (which is what they have done) or just say it's a separate version of Trek, which I believe infinitely more sensible..
Of course real life isn't Trek. Obviously we weren't creating genetically engineered supersoldiers in the mid-60s that conquered a quarter of the world in the 90s. I'm not advocating eliminating major facets of Trek history heavily referenced on the shows and movies in favor of our own. But when it comes to minor stuff that doesn't have a significant impact on the show, I think we should be adaptive to keep up with the social, political, and technological aspects of the world of today.

I don't see how having tactile holograms damages the good name of TNG, and frankly this quasi-Biblical literalism treatment of established Trek down to the most obscure and mundane tech or reference is baffling to me. I like making up theories to explain canon and continuity differences as much as the next geek, but it's not a big deal to me if something is simply changed to conform to the realities of modern life.

Also looking at the world around us today I don't think it's that convoluted to imagine the USSR coming back again at some point. Kind of feels like anything could happen these days.
Having a new communist country rise up built on nostalgia for the old Soviet Union is not impossible, but having it conform to the same names, borders, component states, etc. as its earlier counterpart seems unlikely.

Russia under Vladimir Putin is basically the Soviet Union all over again. All that's missing is the name.
Russia today has more in common with its old enemy fascism (though it doesn't quite fit the classical definition yet) than it does with the Soviet Union, though it's not alone in taking on fascistic qualities, unfortunately. It's an authoritarian oligarchy.
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top