Star Trek Rotten Tomatoes Rating

[Amaris]

That is exceptional, moreso for a Star Trek movie!


J.

 

[Admiral Buzzkill]

Time magazine's reviewer loved it:

http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1896513,00.html

But the ultimate back-story, and the heart of the movie, as it should be, is the love story between Kirk and Spock.

 

[Cakes488]

Good the LA times is a big Newspaper this is a good sign

The New York Daily News also seems to slightly like it...

Yeah the headline of the review is "star trek is a steller gem of a film"...5 outta 5 stars. It was also in newsday on like the 4th page...

Next it'll be on the front page of the NY Times!

 

[urbandk]

Yeah the headline of the review is "star trek is a steller gem of a film"...5 outta 5 stars. It was also in newsday on like the 4th page...

Next it'll be on the front page of the NY Times!

Star Trek rocks! In other news, negotiations break down between Zardari and the Taliban, Obama appoints Bork to Supreme Court, and Specter becomes a Whig.

 

[superdeluxe]

RT: 102/109

rating 8/10

26/28 of top critics

Metacritic is taking a dip: 85/100 on 19 reviews

 

[Admiral Buzzkill]

Yep, RT's Top Critics rating has climbed up to 93%, which is higher than the rating finally achieved by "The Dark Knight."

 

[cooleddie74]

Good the LA times is a big Newspaper this is a good sign

The New York Daily News also seems to slightly like it...

Yeah the headline of the review is "star trek is a steller gem of a film"...5 outta 5 stars. It was also in newsday on like the 4th page...

Next it'll be on the front page of the NY Times!

FIVE STARS?!?!?

Saints and Temporal Agents be praised!!

 

[Temis the Vorta]

Time magazine's reviewer loved it:

http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1896513,00.html

But the ultimate back-story, and the heart of the movie, as it should be, is the love story between Kirk and Spock.

If that's true, JJ has very keen instincts. Forget going boldly and commies-in-space, THAT is what Trek has always been about.

 

[cooleddie74]

Time magazine's reviewer loved it:

http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1896513,00.html

But the ultimate back-story, and the heart of the movie, as it should be, is the love story between Kirk and Spock.

If that's true, JJ has very keen instincts. Forget going boldly and commies-in-space, THAT is what Trek has always been about.

Gay man-on-Vulcan love.

Roddenberry's message since 1964.

 

[Cyrus]

93% good reviews is not good enough. It has to be 100% dammit. Now there is no chance of that happening. Maybe the next movie can do it.

 

[urbandk]

93% good reviews is not good enough. It has to be 100% dammit. Now there is no chance of that happening. Maybe the next movie can do it.

Agreed! Damn it!

 

[KirkusOveractus]

"Let's try for 100, Mr. Spock."
-Kirk, The Corbomite Maneuver

 

[cooleddie74]

Even Trip got the warp engines to 105%.

It can be done.

 

[NXOner]

*shrugs* just me, I guess.

A few of us still exist but never enough. For me, this film will never represent a fair exchange for those missing seasons of ENT.

In that opinion, I am well and truly alone for sure...

No, you're not alone! I like the new movie but it for sure leaves a large unwritten gap and not enough reference to ENT - (one quip about the beagle is not enough)

 

[Jax]

RT Score at moment - 116 reviews with 108 as fresh

Yahoo has users up to an A and critics at B+ though only added 8 and at this rate it could settle at A-.

 

[Amaris]

The fact that we're seeing "A" and "B" and not "D" and "F" speaks volumes about the quality of this movie.


J.

 

[Kelso]

The fact that we're seeing "A" and "B" and not "D" and "F" speaks volumes about the quality of this movie.


J.

You are a wise man, J. Allen.

 

[backstept]

damn what's higher than A++? ~+?

 

[Tulin]

*shrugs* just me, I guess.

A few of us still exist but never enough. For me, this film will never represent a fair exchange for those missing seasons of ENT.

In that opinion, I am well and truly alone for sure...

No, you're not alone! I like the new movie but it for sure leaves a large unwritten gap and not enough reference to ENT - (one quip about the beagle is not enough)

Why would there be a reference to something that is widely considered non canon?

I don't get it!

 

[Amaris]

The fact that we're seeing "A" and "B" and not "D" and "F" speaks volumes about the quality of this movie.


J.

You are a wise man, J. Allen.

Well, I was a founding member of the Department of Redundancy Department, but I stand by my point.


J.