• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Prodigy 1x10 - "A Moral Star, Part 2"

Rate the episode...


  • Total voters
    100
Mercy and compassion would have been TO kill him, not leave him to die slowly on an abandoned asteroid with no food, water or power (or even the suit he needs to survive).

Like I said: Nobody deserves to die like that. Not even the Diviner. I don't CARE what he's done. Far as I'm concerned, anyone who gloats over the Diviner's suffering and (eventual) death is no better than he.

A reminder there is ZERO reason to think he was left without food, water, or power. There was power and gravity on the asteroid when we saw him there in that final shot, so the kids clearly repaired it. Tars Lamora was outfitted to feed and house hundreds of miners even without the ship — the REV-12 left the asteroid previously in the series in pursuit of the Protostar, and those miners were just fine the whole time. Unless they painstakingly removed enough supplies to ration hundreds for months, this argument doesn’t track. They also said he was weak without his suit, not dead. He is under house arrest at a house he built himself.
 
Last edited:
Seeing Dr. Noum, the new tellarite character at the end, makes it feel more likely that Jankom was originally designed as a talaxian.
 
Idk they have similar eyebrows and nose.

Big difference is the number of fingers, but TOS Tellarites had 3 like Jankom.

https://twitter.com/gaghyogi49/status/1489728817438597133?s=21

Yeah, Jankom has three fingers, like you say. Talaxians do not. ‪‪I don’t Think he was ever meant to be a Talaxian.

And I don’t really think the OP’s logic holds up. This is a cartoon, if they wanted to make Noum and Jankom resemble each other more closely, they would have, and could’ve rendered Noum however they wanted. ‪‪I don’t think the differences indicate that Jankom’s intended species changed as much as it was a choice to show the multiple variations of Tellarites we’ve already seen onscreen coexisting on the same series.
 
Every one-hour action-adventure series in the mid-to-late '60s veered towards camp in one way or another. The Wild Wild West is my favorite '60s action series after TOS and even when that show had a more serious episode there was campy delivery of dialogue(usually from Artemus Gordon in some disguise) and campy fights between Jim West and bad guys driven by a pounding soundtrack that emphasized action.
 
So happy to see the real Janeway, and I look forward to meeting her crew. But Dauntless is an ugly ship.
Dauntless is ugly. Too bad Janeway didn't pull an AGT Admiral Riker and make her old ship her flagship. ;)

Prodigy had one of the strongest first seasons of any Trek show. Completely surprised me and was not what I expected. In a good way! Looking forward to the second half.
 
I'm a little surprised that the PRO creators chose to have Janeway's ship be the same as the fake Starfleet ship from "Hope and Fear." I mean, I guess I can buy that Starfleet decided to copy the design since the fake Dauntless was so fast, but I'm a little surprised that Starfleet would replicated the design aesthetic of the bridge interior. Not a huge deal, just weird.
 
There are two possible in-universe reasons I can think of for why the bridge looks the same:
  1. It was designed in a hurry and they didn't see the point in wasting time changing things that already worked fine on the original ship.
  2. Janeway was still furious that Arturis once dangled a ship in front of them and then snatched it away, and she wanted it back. Or a really good copy at least.
 
I just had a thought about the final scene with the Diviner:

Janeway makes reference to that bit in her final narration, doesn't she? So if it's really all within the Diviner's mind, how can she know about it?
 
‪‪I can sort of see Janeway wanting the real Federation Dauntless to be as close to the original design aesthetic as they could make it, just to be super vindictive about Arturis.

Dear God. That would reflect terribly on Janeway.
 
Dear God. That would reflect terribly on Janeway.

‪‪I love Janeway, and ‪‪don’t prescribe to many of the (mis)characterizations I’ve seen questioning her stability over the course of Voyager, but over the course of Voyager I think Janeway came across as capabale of pettiness, and vindictiveness at times.

‪‪And this isn’t something exclusive to Janeway, ‪‪I would characterize both Kirk and Picard similarly based on their actions and attitudes from time to time in TOS, TNG, and the films.

‪‪I agree that it’s not a positive quality, but a human failing that as imperfect beings our heroes will still demonstrate on occasion when they falter, or have been particularly hurt by emotional pain, loss, or deception.

Vindictiveness feels like a natural potential response when someone is both hurt and defensive, as Janeway seemed to be by the end of Hope and Fear. She had been lied to, promised a way home for her crew, and the anger she had at that being dangled before them and taken away was compounded with the guilt from feeling responsible for Arturis’s people.

I can see someone who for the most part tries to adhere to a higher moral standard slipping in the way she responds to that experience, and saying “I want this as close to the ship ‪‪he promised me as you can make it.”

Let's say Harry Kim designed it then.

It’s funny you mention that, because in The Omega Directive there’s a moment where Harry has a line of dialogue mentioning working on Janeway’s idea to “detonate a type six protostar” as a potential way to get home faster. ‪‪I think it’s highly likely Harry, and B’Elanna and Tom, designed the Protostar itself, and almost certainly helped make the Dauntless a reality, with their experience making shuttles and with the original fake Dauntless.
 
Last edited:
‪‪I love Janeway, and ‪‪don’t prescribe to many of the (mis)characterizations I’ve seen questioning her stability over the course of Voyager, but over the course of Voyager I think Janeway came across as capabale of pettiness, and vindictiveness at times.

‪‪And this isn’t something exclusive to Janeway, ‪‪I would characterize both Kirk and Picard similarly based on their actions and attitudes from time to time in TOS, TNG, and the films.

‪‪I agree that it’s not a positive quality, but a human failing that as imperfect beings our heroes will still demonstrate on occasion when they falter, or have been particularly hurt by emotional pain, loss, or deception.

Vindictiveness feels like a natural potential response when someone is both hurt and defensive, as Janeway seemed to be by the end of Hope and Fear. She had been lied to, promised a way home for her crew, and the anger she had at that being dangled before them and taken away was compounded with the guilt from feeling responsible for Arturis’s people.

I can see someone who for the most part tries to adhere to a higher moral standard slipping in the way she responds to that experience, and saying “I want this as close to the ship ‪‪he promised me as you can make it.”

Yeah, it's definitely not make or break for the character, and having flawed heroes is good. I was just thinking how Arturis was a person who had a terrible response to an overwhelming loss, and was pitiable. Given his likely fate, it feels petty of Janeway to feel that way (since this is conjecture, we don't know if she actually does). Probably not a plot question we will ever get a follow-up to.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top