Then one of the other shows would have won. They were way more popular than Picard Season 3.That it's a popularity contest.
Then one of the other shows would have won. They were way more popular than Picard Season 3.That it's a popularity contest.
They were certainly better madeThey were way more popular than Picard Season 3.
No, they were also more popular. I rarely saw anyone except Star Trek fans or Star Trek sites talk about Season 3 on Social media.They were certainly better made
Popularity was clearly the wrong word. Regardless, the awards were clearly biased towards Picard. It was certainly not any kind of measurement of quality, as other shows were vastly superior on most fronts.No, they were also more popular. I rarely saw anyone except Star Trek fans or Star Trek sites talk about Season 3 on Social media.
Meanwhile I saw a wide verity of people talking about the other series nominated.
I listen to a few non-star trek media podcasts, and I've heard those shows brought up, but never Picard Season 3. Picard sometimes, but usually something to effect they gave up on it after the first season.
Though Andor was ultimately a damn good show, it was a bit of an acquired taste. The first three episode arc about Andor fighting the corporate security goons honestly bored me. It wasn't until the fourth episode onwards when they began with the ISB storyline and Mon Mothma's material that the show really got going.
Most awards are when it comes to entertainment.That it's a popularity contest.
Are they?Most awards are when it comes to entertainment.
Not popularity based upon what audiences love, but popularity in what Hollywood loves. So, it's reflective of that subculture within.Are they?
Forgetting that I'm now thinking that popularity was the wrong choice of words in regards to Picard..... If popularity was the number one factor in handing out awards, wouldn't ever Oscar's, at least a few years ago, be dominated by Marvel movies?
The fact they gave Picard season 3 the award for best Sci-fi series over Andor, nevermind that they gave Stewart the award over Diego Luna or Pedro Pascal in TLOU, tells me everything I need to know about these awards.
It's like "Return of the King" at the Oscars. That is to say, Picard was ending, and Andor still has another year. So they can give Andor its award after season 2, but they will not have another chance for Picard.
The fact they gave Picard season 3 the award for best Sci-fi series over Andor, nevermind that they gave Stewart the award over Diego Luna or Pedro Pascal in TLOU, tells me everything I need to know about these awards.
Both SNW Season 2 and DSC Season 4 were better and more intelligently written shows for sure.
I would be inclined towards this, at least if I were to put Picard against the two. I think SNW Season 2 was a much more mixed bag, but when it landed it (Among the Lotus Eaters, Broken Circle) it landed it well. Discovery was also very enjoyable and introduced some very interesting characters, and built upon Burnham more. But, I will of course be transparent and say that there are few TNG characters who hook me like Pike or Burnham either.Both SNW Season 2 and DSC Season 4 were better and more intelligently written shows for sure.
Not really. I'll do it right now. Andor was a better show than Picard in every conceivable way.I think it's incredibly difficult to throw down a firm "one was better than the other".
SNW S4 was fun... but it relied heavy on gimmick episodes
plain silliness.
SNW had 3 good episodes, PIC had 10.Both SNW Season 2 and DSC Season 4 were better and more intelligently written shows for sure.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.