Yes.Wasn't one of the reasons for adding the side consoles to account for shooting in widescreen vs 4:3? Tbh it's kind of jarring to see so much of the original D's bridge in widescreen, with there being so little to catch the eye on the sides.
Yes.Wasn't one of the reasons for adding the side consoles to account for shooting in widescreen vs 4:3? Tbh it's kind of jarring to see so much of the original D's bridge in widescreen, with there being so little to catch the eye on the sides.
I think at one point even on the show they were gonna have side panels/stations, but that would have meant extras on the bridge every episode so they dropped it (like the same way we rarely see the bridge crew seat warmers unlike in the pilot) and we got lockers instead.
Yes, although I assume the entire plan hinges on having a giant attack fleet ready to blow up Earth.Presumably, the Borg could still use Jack to send out the assimilation signal even if the fleet wasn't together.
I think there's a fundamental misunderstanding about what this series is and what it is attempting to be. This is an entire series built upon nostalgia for a character and for that character's era of Star Trek. That is the baseline upon which everything else is built upon.
People are entitled to like it or dislike it, but I don't understand the shock or surprise from some about how the series is structured around both nostalgia for a past time, and how these classic characters interact with each other once again.
As far as how this is a "well-crafted season of Star Trek," again, this fundamentally misunderstands what this show is setting out to do. You may think it needs to be different, but I'm judging it on its own terms. And when you get down in the weeds of arguing about the plot mechanics of the conspiracy plot, it misses the forest for the trees. This is like all of those old articles which used to argue that Marvel and the MCU had a "villain problem." The first Avengers film is not really about Loki (or even Thanos and the Infinity Stone saga plot). It is paper thin (i.e., scepter mind controls people to help create a giant hole in the sky) and only the window dressing the story uses to explore the interactions between the characters of the titular team, using both the nostalgia that comes with the history of those character's backstory and seeing them work together through a problem.
The themes of Picard season 3 is NOT really centered around the conspiracy plot. It is about the power that comes through found family, the strength and hope that one can find in accepting our past and how that defines who we are (e.g. Data's victory over Lore), and how these characters interact and support each other. That is true for every featured character, whether it be Data, Riker, Troi, or Picard. The Changeling/Borg plot is only a means to an end.
I wrote a megathread about this a long time ago but I agree with it.Actually, I've always felt that the Galaxy class represented the last configuration of previous ship classes such as the New Orleans, Challenger, Springfield, Nebula, Cheyenne, Freedom and Niagara. It happened to be the largest iteration, but nowhere near the newest, and that type of spaceframe was actually on its way out, in favor of more streamlined designs such as the Intrepid, Sovereign, Nova and Prometheus classes. So I didn't really see the Galaxy class lasting all that long, despite what Sternbach & Okuda's tech manual stated.
That's just because of Star Trek producers' cheapskateness. If time and money was no option, we would never have seen any of the movie models in TNG. We would have gotten new and updated designs for Starfleet and the Klingons.
Picard's premise going in was that this wasn't going to be a reunion show, Picard wasn't going to be in Starfleet, and I heard Patrick tried to veto the Borg in S1 until they made the ex-B allegories of refugee/war victims.Re: The Enterprise-D bridge. I would have liked to have seen it in its Star Trek: Generations configuration too, but if their remit is to hit the nostalgia button, then of course they're gonna go for its classic TNG S3-S7 configuration.
Well... That's true of this season. But season one of Star Trek: Picard was very much anti-nostalgia. It was a loving but skeptical deconstruction of Jean-Luc Picard as a character and of his society. Which is why so many who love the nostalgia fest of S3 hated S1.
These are very fair points, and I think they point to why S3 works even for those of us who conceptually disagree with its premises.
Yeah it was Drexler, not Curry. My bad. Wrong person.They got the plans from Drexler, per his statement on The Seventh Rule.
I think the themes come through much better in the other Trek shows. Prodigy in particular does the found family thing much better, but SNW, Discovery, and even Lower Decks just feel more cohesive.The themes of Picard season 3 is NOT really centered around the conspiracy plot. It is about the power that comes through found family, the strength and hope that one can find in accepting our past and how that defines who we are (e.g. Data's victory over Lore), and how these characters interact and support each other. That is true for every featured character, whether it be Data, Riker, Troi, or Picard. The Changeling/Borg plot is only a means to an end.
Re: The Enterprise-D bridge. I would have liked to have seen it in its Star Trek: Generations configuration too, but if their remit is to hit the nostalgia button, then of course they're gonna go for its classic TNG S3-S7 configuration.
Well... That's true of this season. But season one of Star Trek: Picard was very much anti-nostalgia. It was a loving but skeptical deconstruction of Jean-Luc Picard as a character and of his society. Which is why so many who love the nostalgia fest of S3 hated S1.
These are very fair points, and I think they point to why S3 works even for those of us who conceptually disagree with its premises.
I think the themes come through much better in the other Trek shows. Prodigy in particular does the found family thing much better, but SNW, Discovery, and even Lower Decks just feel more cohesive.
Even the nostalgia doesn't work for me because of how they are ignoring all the work done to Worf on DS9.
Picard Season 3, the Strange New Worlds cut.I do love the headcanon that this is the actual original bridge that was in TNG S1-7 and that the Generations bridge was a brand new bridge module installed in a refit immediately prior to Generations.
It would be great but I doubt it would happen. City on the Edge of Forever is considered one of Trek's greatest episode ever - usually Top 5 or Top 3 - and besides a TAS episode, it took 50 years to get a sequel (of sorts) in Discovery. There were countless proposals to revisit it in all the 90s era shows, and in production of TOS movies during the writing stage. And they went nowhere.
There has been a decades long strange reluctance until very recently to pull on plot threads from TOS like the Guardian of Forever, or the Doomsday Machine. Yeah Enterprise Season 4 did a bunch that were long ignored - the Tholians, the pre-fall of the Terran Empire Mirror Universe, the Gorn, the Organians, the Augments and the flat-forehead Klingons - but that was in large part because Rick Berman checked out. Discovery and SNW seized on a lot of these, so maybe the relecutance was generational and there is more of a chance of seeing a sequel to things like the Doomsday Machine now.
Depends on how they resolve the Borg.Picard's premise going in was that this wasn't going to be a reunion show, Picard wasn't going to be in Starfleet, and I heard Patrick tried to veto the Borg in S1 until they made the ex-B allegories of refugee/war victims.
Picard Season 3 is a reunion show, Picard has spent basically the entire season in a Starfleet ship doing Starfleet things, and the events of this season practically guarantee that, in-universe, ex-B will be more feared and hated than ever and Hugh died for nothing.
I would imagine that came from Roddenberry wanting to distance TNG from TOS, and not having the exact same things repeated, or too many things repeated, aside from the PSI 2000 virus. I think there was a strong push to go away from TOS threads, and treat the galaxy a bit more like a blank slate. And then it swung the other way to revisiting Spock, and Scotty and Sarek and so on. But, I think those little one offs are going to be ignored, save for Greg Cox and other authors having fun with it.There has been a decades long strange reluctance until very recently to pull on plot threads from TOS like the Guardian of Forever, or the Doomsday Machine.
What work?
I do love the headcanon that this is the actual original bridge that was in TNG S1-7 and that the Generations bridge was a brand new bridge module installed in a refit immediately prior to Generations.
Why didn't Geordi give the Ent-D a power wash from the outside, still has a lot of Veridian grime on it
I think the themes come through much better in the other Trek shows. Prodigy in particular does the found family thing much better, but SNW, Discovery, and even Lower Decks just feel more cohesive.
Even the nostalgia doesn't work for me because of how they are ignoring all the work done to Worf on DS9.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.