• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Picard 2x09 - "Hide and Seek"

Rate the episode...


  • Total voters
    201
I don't think anyone has answered this question yet. Picard told us in this episode that the tunnels beneath the Chateau were used by the French Resistance in the early years of WWII and then sealed up later in the war, with all kinds of munitions still down there - he cited it as one of the reasons he wasn't supposed to go down there as a child, because it was known to be very unsafe. That's why the gun was there, it was left behind by the resistance during WWII.

As others have said, the older brother was mentioned in an earlier episode. He was away at school on the day of this particular memory - which, although it has been stretched over an entire season and therefore seems like a long period of time, this particular memory is of a single day in Jean Luc's life.

Her nanoprobes were severely depleted after being held captive by the Confederation. She's been working to make more, but they are imperfect and still extremely limited, resulting in imperfect assimilation.

Someone in 1800 might say the same of our society today - they have so many treatments available, why do people still die? I guess the answer is that every single case is a unique individual, people are imperfect and make imperfect choices, even the most wondrous of treatments generally has limits, and in any society people can fall through the cracks. There was an episode of TNG in which Worf was paralysed and wanted to be allowed to commit suicide rather than either live with a disability or consent to a risky treatment, and although he later changed his mind, the episode emphasised his right as an individual to make that choice. By that metric, 24th century society would also allow Yvette the right to choose, so long as she wasn't harming anyone else with her choice.

To be fair, all we know is that the crew believe there is only supposed to be one timeline, and they've been operating off that assumption all season. Just because they believe it, doesn't mean it is true - which is probably the point of Borgati's parting statement.

Regarding the gun in the basement, I must have missed the part where he said there were weapons down there. But it still seems a bit convenient to find one in working order after decades-I'm assuming-of disuse.
 
Hologram Space Legolas fighting a troop of Borg Mercenary Drones.

.... I think this season has gotten dumb.
 
Last edited:
It always amused me that these torpedos have much less explosive power than an atomic bomb from the 1940s.
This is more because Trek seems to only have either photon or quantum torpedoes throughout its franchise (and they're still using quantum in the far future of Discovery).

As such, even though we were told back as early as TOS that the Enterprise can easily bombard a planet to crisp in minutes, every time we actually see a ship make a ground strike it ends up looking very small so as not to make the characters look like mass murderers leveling cities. Thus the very small torpedo strike on "God" in Star Trek 5 for example. And since the only torpedoes ever mentioned in dialogue are, again, photon or quantum (and even quantum is a post TNG thing), the audience is left underwhelmed when seeing the torpedo strikes we were told were supposed to be able to level whole countries.

We have to assume that they can set the destruction level of photon torpedoes, or something, and what we see is a very low power strike compared to the higher power devastation of planet strikes mentioned as possible in dialogue.
 
They're gonna be really disappointed when they make this big elaborate plan to save Renee next episode and then Soong just shoots down her rocket with a Stinger missile.
 
Ugh, this episode was terrible. None of it makes sense, it's mostly in grays and... Ugh. So, Jurati Borg turns Seven into a Borg to save her and she ends up looking exactly the same as regular Seven?

Picard saw this mother as an old woman!! I mean... That whole aspect of the season doesn't make sense or add up.

Grrrrrrrrrrr.... This episode just angers me.
 
To be honest, I hope you're wrong about that. I just don't see what FBI guy can add that the other players couldn't. What unique purpose would he serve? Without a unique purpose that no one else could fill, he just becomes an additional element muddying the waters in a conclusion that already needs to be extra tight.

Maybe a unique purpose exists. I guess we'll see.
I have no idea what purpose he'd serve. Just they'd bring everyone together.
 
This is more because Trek seems to only have either photon or quantum torpedoes throughout its franchise (and they're still using quantum in the far future of Discovery).

As such, even though we were told back as early as TOS that the Enterprise can easily bombard a planet to crisp in minutes, every time we actually see a ship make a ground strike it ends up looking very small so as not to make the characters look like mass murderers leveling cities. Thus the very small torpedo strike on "God" in Star Trek 5 for example. And since the only torpedoes ever mentioned in dialogue are, again, photon or quantum (and even quantum is a post TNG thing), the audience is left underwhelmed when seeing the torpedo strikes we were told were supposed to be able to level whole countries.

We have to assume that they can set the destruction level of photon torpedoes, or something, and what we see is a very low power strike compared to the higher power devastation of planet strikes mentioned as possible in dialogue.

The destructive power is set by the amount of antimatter mixed or loaded in the torpedo.
just like shells. big shells small shells. The captain is liable for needless collateral damage/deaths.
Also is like using a nuke to kill a terrorist.
 
They're gonna be really disappointed when they make this big elaborate plan to save Renee next episode and then Soong just shoots down her rocket with a Stinger missile.
They could simply attack the mission at the spaceport or in orbit on enroute to Europa.
To abort a mission just takes a small amount of debris.
 
Are you aware of ENTERPRISE INCIDENTS with Scott and Steve?
Every episode is discussed in detail plus behind the scenes and many directors of the original series interviewed.

It seems Shatner was not the bad person he is claimed to be according to the directors.

I should point out these episodes can be listened to instead of being watched and also they SOLVE the
Khan/Chekov problem neatly.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Not to get too far off topic, but I don't believe Shatner was a bad guy per se, just a self-involved actor. I think the Takei "feud" is mainly about Takei trying to get attention for himself. There's a reason why Shatner was the star and Takei was a day player.

But, much like Stewart and Picard, when Shatner got some creative control with Star Trek V, his instinct was to make his own character look good at the expense of the supporting cast. He wasn't trying to be mean or anything, he was just thinking of his own character instead of what would best serve the story or the cast as a whole. Again, kind of like Patrick Stewart is doing now.
 
Nothing we've seen so far has yet to explain why Picard was unwilling to seal the deal with Lariss
Trauma from his mom dying due to his actions?

Given Picard's history I feel like that's a pretty solid answer, especially since Jack Crusher died, that science officer almost died, Ba'ku lady almost died.

Dude must feel like he has an albatross hanging around his neck.
 
Most of the women in Picard's life can't be the partner he wants and leave him feeling sad or disappointed or they die on him. No wonder he never married or kept a steady relationship going for very long.
Just the fact that in the Trek world there are ultra-realistic holodecks that can instantly satisfy people's hormones as much as they want and as often as they want, I'd like to think that both men and women are motivated to bring more to the table outside of looks to get into an actual relationship with someone. It would be very different than what we have going now, where basically dealing with hormones is a huge part of why many people put up with mismatched or even outright unhealthy/toxic relationships. That aspect would be totally different in Trek's world, even outside of Picard's specific traumatizing backstory.
 
when Shatner got some creative control with Star Trek V, his instinct was to make his own character look good at the expense of the supporting cast.

Actually, the whole TOS cast - Takei included - have always praised Shatner's performance as a director. They said that when they were making ST5, Shat was a total professional at all times and worked as hard as he could to give everyone some time. There was none of the baggage involved when he was just their co-star - meaning, when he was the director, and unquestionably in charge, things went a lot more smoothly.
 
Not to get too far off topic, but I don't believe Shatner was a bad guy per se, just a self-involved actor. I think the Takei "feud" is mainly about Takei trying to get attention for himself. There's a reason why Shatner was the star and Takei was a day player.

I wasn't there obviously, but from reading about it and seeing a bunch of interviews (and saw Keonig talk about it again recently) it was that Shatner wasn't necessarily mean, but he wasn't nice either and really didn't acknowledge the supporting cast members. I think Shatner's POV has been that he wasn't there to make friends, he was there to read his lines and do his work and that's it. The other actors, especially by the time the movies were being made, I think wanted more acknowledgment from Shatner.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top