Data's real father will be retconned as Spot. Soong was only his assistant. Pass it on...
I feel the same way here a disturbing percentage of the time.Spiner seems to be losing patience with a lot of fan speculation/comments on Twitter
Magneto would have made short work of Data easily. But these new organic synths that seemingly don't have metal in them, he would have to struggle.What if at the end of the season Picard dies and then Charles Xavier wakes up confused at the strange dream he had?
What if at the end of the season Picard dies and then Charles Xavier wakes up confused at the strange dream he had?
CBS will carefully write around the copyright. Patrick Stewart will sit in a wheelchair, and someone addresses him as, "Professor, what's wrong?". Patrick will say, "I had the strangest dream."Disney would sue?
In the opening episode the writers wanted us to know (a) that Dahj was Data's daughter and (b) that no one else had seen the painting. That's fine with me, but now they have to explain how Data could have painted Dahj years before she was even created. If no one saw it, then that might imply time travel, but if not that then what? It's a loose end...Perhaps he drew a random girl and then they made the androids look like that painting? Why does it have to be cause and effect?
Nowhere has it ever been said that no one else had ever seen the painting. Picard has it locked away in storage now, but that doesn't mean it has always been kept secret or that nobody else ever got to see it. Maddox, for one, clearly saw it, since he made several synths in its image - and that is very much the sequence of events. We know from TNG that Data kept in touch with Maddox and shared examples of his work with him. No time travel or precognition involved.In the opening episode the writers wanted us to know (a) that Dahj was Data's daughter and (b) that no one else had seen the painting. That's fine with me, but now they have to explain how Data could have painted Dahj years before she was even created. If no one saw it, then that might imply time travel, but if not that then what? It's a loose end...
erm, because the odds of random events happening like that are clearly so remote that it could have only happened by design.Perhaps he drew a random girl and then they made the androids look like that painting? Why does it have to be cause and effect?
Equally, nowhere has it been said that Maddox had seen it. The writers of ep.1 wanted us to believe no one had seen it...even Maddox. They implied Maddox probably created Dahj, yet spent a lot of time/money on the sequence in the archive trying to make us think no one had. It's a loose thread which the writers tugged in ep.1 and have left dangling...it's bad storytelling....all tease with no money-shot.Nowhere has it ever been said that no one else had ever seen the painting.
Maddox *clearly* saw it? No, we have no *evidence* that Maddox saw it, there is only conjecture. You're extrapolating from information in Trek canon, just as one can do from different info in the canon...there's no evidence (yet) to show which is correct.Maddox, for one, clearly saw it, since he made several synths in its image - and that is very much the sequence of events. We know from TNG that Data kept in touch with Maddox and shared examples of his work with him. No time travel or precognition involved.
Issue addressed back in Episode 2.Dr. Agnes Jurati said:Bruce and Data were friends after a fashion. If Bruce is using Data's neurons to create more synths, it would make sense to model them after the painting Data made.
Issue addressed back in Episode 2.
-- Benny Hill, "My Garden of Love". . . Gus the gardener's gone now and you went with him too,
The fungus here reminds me of the fun Gus is having with you . . .
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.