For the second time.Chakotay's a former member of a criminal organization, but he's captain of Voyager now.
For the second time.Chakotay's a former member of a criminal organization, but he's captain of Voyager now.
If Picard wants to keep his son safe (and really, I think we're long past the point where that's a spoiler), then staying in command of the Enterprise is probably the best possible way he can do that.
About Worf in the KDF: I think it does make sense – a fuss was made in one of the pre-Destiny TNG novels that Worf will never be allowed to command a Federation starship, owing to that mission he failed in DS9 to save his wife.
It's not like there's actually something written down somewhere forbidding Worf from becoming a captain. What he did in "Change of Heart" is a serious blot on his record, to be sure, but other Starfleet captains have comparable or worse things in their histories.
So given Worf's mostly exemplary service as a Federation ambassador and Starfleet first officer in the years since, I really don't think it would be impossible for him to earn a command if that was what he wanted. Especially since the Borg invasion devastated Starfleet and they can't afford to turn away any good candidates.
That was one of the things that bugged me about Countdown: it felt as though Vulcan had left the Federation. They didn't share red matter technology with anyone else, and they had their own ambassador on Romulus, where Spock lived and served as the Federation ambassador. They also saw Spock as a traitor. That all just felt wrong.But why would the Federation need an ambassador to one of its own founding worlds? Does the US have an ambassador to Pennsylvania?In Picard’s case, I can’t see him wanting to raise his child on a spaceship. Him becoming ambassador to Vulcan ties in neatly with not only the TNG finale, but that Picard/Sarek mindmeld episode.
In Picard’s case, I can’t see him wanting to raise his child on a spaceship. Him becoming ambassador to Vulcan ties in neatly with not only the TNG finale, but that Picard/Sarek mindmeld episode.
But why would the Federation need an ambassador to one of its own founding worlds? Does the US have an ambassador to Pennsylvania?
That was one of the things that bugged me about Countdown: it felt as though Vulcan had left the Federation. They didn't share red matter technology with anyone else, and they had their own ambassador on Romulus, where Spock lived and served as the Federation ambassador. They also saw Spock as a traitor. That all just felt wrong.
To be fair, the canon and the novels have both blurred those lines a bit in the past. Sarek is established as Vulcan Ambassador to Earth in the 2240s in Star Trek (2009) (and had been previously established as Vulcan Ambassador to Earth as late as the 2270s in Spock's World), and in "Journey to Babel," the representatives were Ambassadors of Federation Member States rather than Federation Councillors, obeying the instructions of their home governments rather than taking their own independent positions as true legislators would. Meanwhile, the DS9 novels Hollow Men and Bajor: Fragments and Omens established that in the 2370s, Alpha Centauri and Bajor both maintain embassies on Earth even after they've both become Federation Member States.
And finally, the ENT episode "In A Mirror, Darkly" had a biographical screen that established that Jonathan Archer became "Ambassador to Andoria" in the 2170s after Andor had helped establish the Federation -- and the novel Destiny: Mere Mortals clarified that he had become Federation Ambassador to Andoria.
Perhaps in the Countdown continuity, it had seceded from the Federation? That would go a long way towards explaining why the Vulcan government refused to help the Romulans yet no Federation agencies stepped in to force them to do so. It would also help explain why Nero blames Spock for the Hobus Star -- he has a legitimate grievance against the Vulcan government and blames Spock for Vulcan's actions, as though he were the living embodiment of the Vulcan elite.
To be fair, the canon and the novels have both blurred those lines a bit in the past. Sarek is established as Vulcan Ambassador to Earth in the 2240s in Star Trek (2009) (and had been previously established as Vulcan Ambassador to Earth as late as the 2270s in Spock's World), and in "Journey to Babel," the representatives were Ambassadors of Federation Member States rather than Federation Councillors, obeying the instructions of their home governments rather than taking their own independent positions as true legislators would. Meanwhile, the DS9 novels Hollow Men and Bajor: Fragments and Omens established that in the 2370s, Alpha Centauri and Bajor both maintain embassies on Earth even after they've both become Federation Member States.
Yes, I can accept the idea that "ambassador" in the Federation has become a title for council members; perhaps they were originally more literal ambassadors and kept the title as the Council and the Federation became more consolidated. But what I have a problem with is the reverse. I can buy a member world's representative to the Federation Council being called an ambassador, but I don't see why the Federation government would in turn have ambassadors to its members.
And finally, the ENT episode "In A Mirror, Darkly" had a biographical screen that established that Jonathan Archer became "Ambassador to Andoria" in the 2170s after Andor had helped establish the Federation -- and the novel Destiny: Mere Mortals clarified that he had become Federation Ambassador to Andoria.
2170s, fine. Again, the system was probably looser then. But that doesn't seem consistent with the much more consolidated Federation of the late 24th century.
Perhaps in the Countdown continuity, it had seceded from the Federation? That would go a long way towards explaining why the Vulcan government refused to help the Romulans yet no Federation agencies stepped in to force them to do so. It would also help explain why Nero blames Spock for the Hobus Star -- he has a legitimate grievance against the Vulcan government and blames Spock for Vulcan's actions, as though he were the living embodiment of the Vulcan elite.
That would be a rather drastic event to leave unexplained in the text. I think if that had been the writers' intention, they would've mentioned it.
Perhaps "ambassador to Vulcan" could become "ambassador for Vulcan", "Praetor" could be "First Minister"... or whatever the chief executive for Vulcan is, etc.
Amusingly enough, even TrekLit has had some confusion here. Towards the end of Enterprise: Kobayashi Maru, T'Pau, as leader of Vulcan, was established to be the First Minister of the Confederacy of Vulcan. But in Enterprise: The Romulan War: Beneath the Raptor's Wing, he is referred to as Administrator (the title previously held by V'Las), with no acknowledgement of the apparent contradiction.
So... Administrator, First Minister, Praetor.... Take your pick!
^Eactly what I was thinking!
T'Pau's a she--always has been, ENT or TOS....![]()
BTW, do you realize that Mike wrote both books? That makes it even less of an excuse.
I swear, he's slipping without Andy.
Data tried it because he hoped it would work. And it failed completely, aside from B-4 retaining one tiny fragment of Data's memory at the very end of the film.
This was exactly the thought I had when reading Countdown. As for it being unexplained in the text-- well, surely that was par for the course for Countdown?That was one of the things that bugged me about Countdown: it felt as though Vulcan had left the Federation. They didn't share red matter technology with anyone else, and they had their own ambassador on Romulus, where Spock lived and served as the Federation ambassador. They also saw Spock as a traitor. That all just felt wrong.
Perhaps in the Countdown continuity, it had seceded from the Federation? That would go a long way towards explaining why the Vulcan government refused to help the Romulans yet no Federation agencies stepped in to force them to do so. It would also help explain why Nero blames Spock for the Hobus Star -- he has a legitimate grievance against the Vulcan government and blames Spock for Vulcan's actions, as though he were the living embodiment of the Vulcan elite.
Data tried it because he hoped it would work. And it failed completely, aside from B-4 retaining one tiny fragment of Data's memory at the very end of the film.
It's equally valid that we can interprete that the download has finally started to "take".
I think it would be interesting if B4 grew up to be his own person, and to honor his brother took the name "Data" as his last name. Therefore he would be Capt Data, but also B4. He would have many similarities to Data, and even a fondness for Data's friends because of all the memories.
It would be very interesting to see that character evolve, and to see him interact with all of Data's old friends, and how they react to him.
How long can the poor guy stare at that big warp engine and stay sane?
It was never meant to turn B-4 into Data, but to give him the capacity to grow into his own being.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.