I prefer the term used by fans of TOS when it was the only Star Trek series available;Man, remember back in the day when Phil Farrand released all of those Nitpicker's Guide books? Each one had pages of errors and inconsistencies of every single episode of TOS, TNG, and DS9. And they were able to call them "nitpicker's guides" because dumb little physics and continuity issues were viewed as quibbles, not show-breaking criticisms. Those were the days...
Yup. It's an impossible standard.The Akaali were previously depicted in Enterprise, so Discovery was just showing them how they first appeared.
Seriously, this show just can't win. When they change the alien makeup, people get upset and ask why they didn't keep it the same as 20 years ago. When they don't change the makeup, people ask why they haven't changed the makeup from 20 years ago.
Here's the differences: those minor quibbles and continuity issues were not used to demonstrate that the show was a failure, that it wasn't Star Trek or that it disrespected the original material.Man, remember back in the day when Phil Farrand released all of those Nitpicker's Guide books? Each one had pages of errors and inconsistencies of every single episode of TOS, TNG, and DS9. And they were able to call them "nitpicker's guides" because dumb little physics and continuity issues were viewed as quibbles, not show-breaking criticisms. Those were the days...
Exactly.Here's the differences: those minor quibbles and continuity issues were not used to demonstrate that the show was a failure, that it wasn't Star Trek or that it disrespected the original material
There's a difference between a minor inconsistency that is almost completely meaningless and a major inconsistency that the entire plot revolves around.You're watching a show where there is sound in space and completely unrelated alien species can breed and have viable offspring. Scientific inaccuracies is par for the course. Deal with it.
What's more troubling though is the DMA should be invisible when it jumps from place to place. The way light speed works, presuming the light is coming from the point source at the center of the anomaly, it should take five years of being in one place to actually become visible to people outside of the envelope of destruction.
Of course, the very first episode of Discovery screwed up light speed as well, with Sarek talking about a "new star in the sky" as soon as the Torchbearer did his job - so everyone on the show seems to believe the speed of light is instantaneous.
"Things don't just disappear then reappear elsewhere"
"Natural anomalies don't do that!"
"Doesn't that violate the laws of physics!"
I literally couldn't take this episode seriously after that start given it's exactly what the Graviton ellipse did...
These writers have a very shallow knowledge of Star Trek. Have they ever heard of unstable wormholes?
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Barzan_wormhole
Which proves there has always been criticism of these things on Trek and loads of it.Man, remember back in the day when Phil Farrand released all of those Nitpicker's Guide books? Each one had pages of errors and inconsistencies of every single episode of TOS, TNG, and DS9. And they were able to call them "nitpicker's guides" because dumb little physics and continuity issues were viewed as quibbles, not show-breaking criticisms. Those were the days...
Which proves there has always been criticism of these things on Trek and loads of it.
But when it's pointed out on a Disco thread it's all "but TNG did it too"
I think it's perfectly fair to criticize Discos crappy science as long as it's not being used to explain how it's worse than other Trek
1) Why the eff are they doing the lab experiment inside the Spore Drive room?That aside, the new guy creates a miniature version of the anomaly, despite just saying that the technology is far beyond what they are capable, and uses the simulation to build more data on how much power it requires to maintain its presence. The reveal? It's being powered by a hypergiant. I'm just going to come right out and say that the fusion power of even a hypergiant isn't going to be enough to power a 5 light year wide black hole. The largest hypergiant we currently know of, that is classed as a hypergiant, is UY-Scuti, which is 7 AU across.
The Barzan Wormhole dived into Subspace or whatever realm it came from. Then it randomly emerged into our space / normal space.The end of the Barzan wormhole didn't so much disappear & reappear, but moved. Not sure what difference that really makes.
It could be, or it could be something else.The ellipse from Voyager did pop in and out of subspace, but that was orange, so IDK if the DMA could be the same![]()
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/NoOSHACompliance/LiveActionTV puts it best: Star Trek is the king of unsafe work environments.1) Why the eff are they doing the lab experiment inside the Spore Drive room?
If something goes wrong, Stamet's Life work goes up in smoke.
2) Why are they doing this experiment during a evacuation crisis? Was there not another lab aboard ANOTHER StarFleet StarShip or Space Station or floating experiment room that they (Stamets & crew) couldn't borrow?
Why do they need to do it on Discovery specifically? Especially in the middle of a humanitarian evacuation crisis.
Stamets could stand to get off discovery and visit another vessel's lab.
3) Why are they always doing the experiment "ON the ship"? Dangerous Experiments needs to be done in a isolated part of space, far away from everybody and everything. They can make containment rooms, reel out many km's worth of energy feed extension cords to a floating test room with remote Holographic Avatars of themselves. We have High Voltage DC lines that can span thousands of km's away from the Power Source. There's no reason to do risky experiments on board the vessel anymore.
They don't need to physically be in the same room as the experiment when you can project yourself via Holographic Projection and be in the safety of your own vessel.
The Barzan Wormhole dived into Subspace or whatever realm it came from. Then it randomly emerged into our space / normal space.
It could be, or it could be something else.
Tarka's hypothesis was that the DMA controller was artificially making the anomaly.
The fact that it disappeared, moved 1,000 ly to another part of the Milky Way Galaxy, and Reappeared seconds later means that somebody is most likely controlling it.
As to what end, for what means, what end game. That's left to be discovered.
But the fact that somebody could make what effectively comes out to be a Hurricane in Space that can appear out of nowhere is very scary.
3) Why are they always doing the experiment "ON the ship"? Dangerous Experiments needs to be done in a isolated part of space, far away from everybody and everything.
That's not a good look for Star Trek.https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/NoOSHACompliance/LiveActionTV puts it best: Star Trek is the king of unsafe work environments.
Yup, and I'm wondering who was the idiot that thought that was a good idea?Wasn't there an episode of TNG where Data and Geordi were testing firing a phaser next to the warpcore?
I would've had a large Standardized R&D Lab Box, similar to Agents of Shields "Containment Module" and let out a VERY LONG (Many Kilometers) power wire to feed power to the Lab Box and have it float VERY FAR away from the power source.I'd have conducted the experiment in the main shuttlebay but that's just me. That way if things go haywire the spore drive isn't threatened, just shuttles and random equipment and storage containers.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.