• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Discovery 3x13 - "That Hope Is You, Part 2"

Rate the episode...


  • Total voters
    265
IMDB gives "That Hope Is You, Part 2" a 6.4 out of 10. "Mediocre" not "The worst of the worst of the worst!" Considering lots of people either love DSC or hate it, I think The Law Of Averages is in play. (link)

Rotten Tomatoes gives "That Hope Is You, Part 2" a 42%. Not good at all, but hardly The Worst. (link)

The Metacritic has not yet given a score. (link)

And for the Hell of it, here are the episodes that Jammer gives one star or less. Some real "classics" in here. Are you ready? Here we go...

"The Gamesters of Triskelion" (TOS) - 1 star
"The Omega Glory" (TOS) - 1 star
"Spock's Brain" (TOS) - 0.5 stars
"And the Children Shall Lead" (TOS) - 0.5 stars
"That Which Survives" (TOS) - 1 star
"The Way to Eden" (TOS) - ZERO STARS!!!
"Code of Honor" (TNG) - 0.5 stars
"Justice" (TNG) - 1 star
"Angel One" (TNG) - 1 star
"When the Bough Breaks" (TNG) - 1 star
"The Royale" (TNG) - 1 star
"Manhunt" (TNG) - 1 star
"Shades of Grey" (TNG) - ZERO STARS!!!
"Devil's Due" (TNG) - 1 star
"Qpid" (TNG) - 1 star
"Cost of Living" (TNG) - 1 star
"Aquiel" (TNG) - 1 star
"Sub Rosa" (TNG) - 0.5 stars
"Masks" (TNG) - 1 star
"Genesis" (TNG) - 1 star
"Fascination" (DS9) - 1 star
"The Muse" (DS9) - 1 star
"Let He Who Is Without Sin" (DS9) - ZERO STARS!!!
"Profit and Lace" (DS9) - ZERO STARS!!!
"The Emperor's New Cloak" (DS9) - 1 star
"Twisted" (VOY) - 1 star
"Threshold" (VOY) - ZERO STARS!!!
"Favorite Son" (VOY) - 1 star
"Demon" (VOY) - 0.5 stars
"The Disease" (VOY) - 1 star
"Spirit Folk" (VOY) - 1 star
"A Night in Sickbay" (ENT) - 1 star
"Precious Cargo" (ENT) - ZERO STARS!!!
"Bound" (ENT) - 1 star

There you go. Star Trek's Hall of Shame, according to Jammer. All the episodes his ratings seem to suggest he thinks are worse.

"But, but... " But nothing.

Don't mention other sources unless you're prepared to actually cite them. Don't say something unless you can actually back it up. Otherwise, it's just trash-talking.
These sites were referenced because contrary to this forum, they gave poor reviews for this episode AND have a degree of objectivity to them. That was my point. Whether they think this episode is the worst one Discovery has ever managed is irrelevant. I think it's the worst episode in the series. The point that led to this is the absurdity of this episode (and every other in this series) getting mostly a 10 rating and then people pointing to that rating to say "See! It can't as bad as you say! It's got mostly a 10 rating!!!"
 
Again, what objectivity? We all have biases and perspectives. I can find a site with 10s and you can find a site with 1s.

The truth likely lies in the middle and is still subjective based upon personal experience. That's why I generally don't worry about ratings. If you liked it, great. If not, that's OK too.

The point that led to this is the absurdity of this episode (and every other in this series) getting mostly a 10 rating and then people pointing to that rating to say "See! It can't as bad as you say! It's got mostly a 10 rating!!!"
Because art is subjective.

ETA: And the push back I see against 10 ratings is the same reaction I have to calling an episode "the worst ever!" It likely isn't the best ever, and probably isn't the worst ever either.
 
These sites were referenced because contrary to this forum, they gave poor reviews for this episode AND have a degree of objectivity to them. That was my point. Whether they think this episode is the worst one Discovery has ever managed is irrelevant. I think it's the worst episode in the series. The point that led to this is the absurdity of this episode (and every other in this series) getting mostly a 10 rating and then people pointing to that rating to say "See! It can't as bad as you say! It's got mostly a 10 rating!!!"
I don't put any stock in "But it got mostly a 10!" either. I gave it an 8. And I know I lean pro. I know I have a slant and wouldn't pretend otherwise, because it's just my take.

The truth, as much as is possible when it comes to opinion, is in the middle. I just cited sources that require thousands of people voting, where the average of their scores -- the summary of their consensus -- hovered in the middle.

Saying "this is the worst ever!" is also a slant and a disregard of that consensus from those other places. But most of the people who say so seem to lack the awareness of it.

I won't ignore a consensus with a melting pot of different opinions just because it doesn't back up what I personally think. But too many people who are anti-Discovery will.
 
Last edited:
I think some are from the Fandom Menace. There is a concerted effort of repeated talking points around various sites I've seen. Conspiracy? I mean, technically...
 
so seem to do those who say that the numerous negative reviews are due a conspiracy...
I think the opinions and reviews of people who aren't monetized are genuine.

It's only when I think they're monetized, and appeal specifically to an audience with a particular slant, that I question it. Some rando on the internet who says "This is the worst!", I believe they think that. I think they're wrong, but I don't doubt this is their opinion. Midnight's Edge on the other hand: they have to give a negative take no matter what. To do otherwise would cause their subscriber base to tune out and thus damage their business model.

I feel bad for the people who hate the show but listen to The Fandom Menace and take their word as gospel because I think the Fandom Menace is taking advantage of them to line their pockets, so they can spew hate for a living instead of getting a real job.
 
These sites were referenced because contrary to this forum, they gave poor reviews for this episode AND have a degree of objectivity to them. That was my point. Whether they think this episode is the worst one Discovery has ever managed is irrelevant. I think it's the worst episode in the series. The point that led to this is the absurdity of this episode (and every other in this series) getting mostly a 10 rating and then people pointing to that rating to say "See! It can't as bad as you say! It's got mostly a 10 rating!!!"

Who are you quoting there? The reason I mentioned the ratings it's getting is because the ones you listed are generally considered, by fans of Trek and the episodes' respective series, to be the worst episodes of the franchise and there's some level of consensus there - and you're so widely missing the point regarding consensus that I'm beginning to think it's deliberate - to show that aside from personal views (I personally love the ENT finale, but most don't... it's just a personal view, it doesn't speak to its actual quality) those episodes are generally considered the worst. This, by a long shot it seems, doesn't deserve to be thought of in that way because it doesn't have the consensus. Anyway, there's one thing we can agree upon; this has become absurd. I'm out of this particular discussion as the dead donkey can't be flogged to death more than once. I will end by repeating what I said earlier, I've no issue with somebody hating something - you're entitled to your personal view, as is everyone else. However, if you read your original post back it's clear it wasn't only personal opinion (hall of fame, etc) but an attempt to lob it in with widely derided episodes. That's why I mentioned consensus.
 
why do you feel the need to repeat so often such an exceptional theory and at the same time don’t feel the need to prove it, then?
I don't think I've repeated but maybe once in this particular thread. Maybe twice. I don't think it is exception-I think it's pretty standard fan behavior at times. The internet just provides more vocal presence for it.

I don't feel the need to prove it because I'm not here to change anyone's mind.
 
Twice in this thread and at least once in every other discovery episode thread, then? Sounds like repeating to me. And sounds like you are trying to spread your theory, “changing someone’s mind”, if you will.
 
Twice in this thread and at least once in every other discovery episode thread, then? Sounds like repeating to me. And sounds like you are trying to spread your theory, “changing someone’s mind”, if you will.
I don't recall other threads or mentioning the ratings...:shrug: I really don't care about ratings all that much.

And I don't care if people believe me or not. So, no, I'm not trying to change minds. I state what I think.:shrug:
 
This season went completely down the tubes after a promising start. At least the show isn't as bad as Voyager.
 
"Parody: Modern Trekkies If The Search for Spock Was New"
- by Lord Garth

Two years ago, if you told me there would be a Star Trek movie worse than Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, I never would've believed you. Other critics may say Star Trek III: The Search for Spock is "strictly for Trekkies" but I couldn't disagree more. Nothing about it reminds me of the television series. Where, oh where, do I begin?

One of the only good things about this movie is that it brings Mr. Spock back to life. But I did NOT need to be reminded of his death right from the beginning of the movie! One point down right off the bat!

What's the Hell happened to the Klingons?! First of all, it was bad enough that they completely redesigned them in the first film. What's with the forehead make-up? You can barely see the actors! And now they're flying around in a Bird-of-Prey?! I swear that Harve Bennett must've never watched an episode of Star Trek in his entire life! Every Star Trek fan worth his weight in gold knows it's THE ROMULANS who have a Bird-of-Prey and cloak! Watch some Star Trek for a change. The REAL Star Trek! That's two points down so far!

Why does the Admiral want to decommission the Enterprise? 20 years old? Two films ago, Decker said the Enterprise was almost brand-new! The writer Harve Bennett just doesn't pay any attention to the details! When they show the computer display of the Enterprise on the bridge, it's based off the Franz Joseph Technical Manual, from before the Enterprise's Refit! I know! I studied the manual in loving detail! A lot more than the so-called "professionals!" Three points down!

When Dr. McCoy goes into the bar to meet with that skeezy dealer, it looks like something from straight out of Star Wars! So now Star Trek is ripping off another franchise? Worse than that, they're playing arcade games! If this is supposed to be the 23rd Century, don't make it feel so much like the '80s! Four points down!

I can't believe I didn't mention this earlier, but whose bright idea was it to have the Klingon Commander played by Christopher Lloyd, the guy who played Reverend Jim from "Taxi"?! How am I supposed to take him seriously?! Five points down.

Even worse is the casting for Saavik! Why couldn't they get back Kristie Alley? Robin Curtis looks nothing like her! Why couldn't they just make her a new character?! They're banking on familiarity from before! Six points down!

Why did Kirk need to steal the Enterprise to rescue Spock? Couldn't he just book a freighter in secret?! But I guess they had to because otherwise they wouldn't have had a chance to blow up the Enterprise. Ho-hum. They're just trying to use emotional manipulation with these movies and just expecting us to buy it. Seven points down!

By the way, they're trying REALLY hard to make these Star Trek Movies work toward these emotional moments that are COMPLETELY UNEARNED! David is introduced as Kirk's son from out of nowhere in the last movie. He didn't even know Kirk was his father until the end of it! But now Kirk suddenly has a son, just to kill him off, just so Kirk can have an emotional breakdown? Give me a break! Eight points down!

And this one deserves its own category! Kirk's cried now in all three movies! What's with all the crying?! He looked like he was about to tear up when he saw the Enterprise for the first time in the first movie. Then he cried at the end of the second movie! And now he's crying in the third! These are Starfleet Officers! They're highly-trained! Remember when Kirk's own brother died in "Operation: Annihilate!"? Episode 29! He didn't cry! Not even once! He collected himself and went about his duty, like a Professional! Like a Military Man! Nine points down!

Last, but not least: What was all of this even for? Spock was brought back to life but he can't even remember anything! It's like it's Spock but it's NOT Spock! "And the Adventure Continues"?! What is it with movies and sequels these days? I remember a time when movies had a beginning, middle, and end! One film, one story! Now they just go from one to the next!

10 points down!!!!


On a scale of 1 to 10, I give Star Trek III: The Search for Spock a 0. A ZERO!!!! Harve Bennett and now Leonard Nimoy are trying to destroy Gene Roddenberry's Star Trek! I heard a rumor that they blew up the Enterprise just so they could replace it with the Excelsior! I believe it. They just keep trying to make it worse and worse! This isn't real Star Trek! You want to watch real Star Trek?! Like I said before, turn on the TV! Don't go to the movies!!!! Boycott this film at every turn. It's the Trekkie thing to do.

You nailed it to the wall with this bit about modern fandom, Garth-great work.
 
The Turbolift Funhouse is so spacious that every villain who has ever fallen into a bottomless pit in Star Trek will be found there, still falling. He'll meet Kruge, the Reman Viceroy, and even an inexplicably-alive if slightly sunburnt Mirror Lorca, who'll talk to him about the villainous civilization they've built throughout the years and will kindly ask him to share some news about the outside world, as is customary for new arrivals.

I just thought of the Wall from Solar Opposites....
 
Because most people equate the Star Trek theme with Star Trek and not Archer's theme. :shrug:
I took it to imply that Discovery is now off to enjoy more TOS-style space exploration, getting back to normality, in many ways.

I took it to mean it would be going back to the TOS themes of long lost planets and colonies out at the frontier, visiting down on their luck miners, lost Star Fleet ships and colonies left to their own devices for much to long, and other common TOS tropes, which I am greatly looking forward to.
 
This season went completely down the tubes after a promising start. At least the show isn't as bad as Voyager.

This is my opinion as well. I wouldn't say I'm anti-Discovery. Some of the earlier episodes this season were quite good. But the season fell off a cliff after the MU two partner and this finale was just awful. Really bad.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top