Most people don't read all of the comments and just look at the average so I like the average to be as accurate as possible.
Sure. But some makes more sense than others. A child screaming triggering a subspace something because DNA and lots of nearby dilithium doesn't work for me. I also think it avoids some more interesting issues.I guess it just depends on how far you go to consider something purely technobabble. I mean, I think you could even consider the use of the term dilithium and its uses in Star Trek as technobabble to some degree. I honestly don't think the way it was portrayed here was even close to one of the worse uses of technobabble in Star Trek as a whole. But yes, everyone has a different opinion, and yours obviously is different than mine.
That mysterious melody that occured everywhere, was that explained? I feel like I missed something.
That's not unique to Burnham. We have a show that's literally called Star Trek: Picard and while it doesn't say Saint Picard (spoilers if for some reason you haven't watched Picard yet)(or Star Trek: Saint Michael)
A really great start to the season, a very decent middle, but the end ?
Sadly anticlimactic and ill judged. Not actually bad, but unremittingly...average.
5/10
Yes, I watched Picard and I agree.That's not unique to Burnham. We have a show that's literally called Star Trek: Picard and while it doesn't say Saint Picard (spoilers if for some reason you haven't watched Picard yet)
And that's not even getting into Cadet to Captain Kelvin Timeline Kirk.Picard literally dies for the sins of the Federation and is miraculously resurrected. That was way, way, way more 10x on the nose to deifying Picard than anything Discovery has remotely done with Burnham.
Sure, it could be a black swan event as you describe. Ultimately, that is what caused the Burn. However, the problem isn't just that it's an unpredictable event, but that this particular cause involves a very superficial and obvious solution. Calm the child down!I buy into the explanation for The Burn. We always assume, today, that if the end comes, it will probably be because of a war, or a plague, or something man-made. The Burn's cause was, to them, the undetected comet that comes out of nowhere and causes an extinction-level event one Tuesday afternoon. It's the unknowable, unplanned, left-field unpredictable event that throws everything hard left. That the Federation could be devastated by something like that, something it's great minds and science and fleets couldn't force or prevent, that makes it the more interesting cause. Asimov would have loved it!
Sure, it could be a black swan event as you describe. Ultimately, that is what caused the Burn. However, the problem isn't just that it's an unpredictable event, but that this particular cause involves a very superficial and obvious solution. Calm the child down!
Given the events of the story, I can certainly understand him being upset! My objection is not that, but rather that it was an upset child (understandably so) that caused the burn and that the solution was to calm him down. While coming him down makes sense given the context, for me, it's not a satisfying resolution to a season long mystery.Calm the child down from seeing his mother dying in front of his eyes? I'm very much in the 'you first' camp on that one. Also, wasn't he alone at that point?
That the heroes are going to save the day?That's not unique to Burnham. We have a show that's literally called Star Trek: Picard and while it doesn't say Saint Picard (spoilers if for some reason you haven't watched Picard yet)
And that's not even getting into Cadet to Captain Kelvin Timeline Kirk.Picard literally dies for the sins of the Federation and is miraculously resurrected. That was way, way, way more 10x on the nose to deifying Picard than anything Discovery has remotely done with Burnham.
I am hoping Season 4 allows for that exploration.Imagine if it had involved more complex issues such as resource scarcity, ignoring a growing problem, group think in the Federation, or whatever. There were hints of something more complex at the beginning of the season but that wasn't the end result. I was hoping for something a bit more complex and meaningful than calming a child down.
Given the events of the story, I can certainly understand him being upset! My objection is not that, but rather that it was an upset child (understandably so) that caused the burn and that the solution was to calm him down. While coming him down makes sense given the context, for me, it's not a satisfying resolution to a season long mystery.
In other words, the events of the plot are logical. The solution fits the problem as presented. However, I didn't find it at all compelling.
I am hoping Season 4 allows for that exploration.
However, and my bias will show greatly here, knowing the full metal impact that can happen with children struggling with trauma I think that work is just as meaningful as any other commentary. Mostly because people don't think kids can suffer that much with trauma and should just "get over it" and talk it out like adults. There's more to healing than just calming a child down.
Realistically there's no way Su'kal will ever live the rest of his life in peace. It's like the Hulk from Marvel: "You won't like me when I'm angry" kind of thing. That's why Hulk always has a bunch of military and scientists chasing him around.And the episode made it clear that Saru was going to be busy with the long-term healing. The child's story wasn't done by any means.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.