• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Discovery 2x08 - "If Memory Serves"

Hit it!


  • Total voters
    281
then again... Black Bolt
He was also great in Hell on Wheels, so I don't blame him for what he did on The Inhumans.

This one get a sold nine from.
I loved the recap of The Cage, and the fact that the whole episode really did serve as a sequel to it. I expected there to be a few references to it since they were going back to Talos IV, but I was really surprised they actually dealt so much with Pike and Vina's relationship.
It was nice to see them really focus on how Culber's return has changed him and his relationship with Stamets. I also liked that we got a confrontation between him and Tyler, that really was something that needed to happen.
And after all the build we finally got to learn what exactly what happened to Spock and Burnham. You could definitely see in that scene just how much what she said to Spock hurt him, and it even seemed pretty painful for her.
I really like Ethan Peck's take on Spock, it was not necessarily an imitation of Nimoy or Quinto, but he still did a good job of capturing the feel of Spock.
 
Full of SJW crap
Engages in white male bashing

Don't bother talking to someone like that, @Ovation. Really, do not bother.

The moment someone mentions any of this utterly ridiculous, whiny, entitled, bullshit nonsense (you may also call it a dog-whistle), it's time to nope out of the "conversation" (it has since stopped being one) at ludicrous speeds. There is nothing you can say or do to reach someone who's having a pathetic man-baby tantrum just because a piece of media dares to actually have the temerity to cast people who don't all look alike. We all know that's what it's about when anyone - anyone - starts vomiting this mock-worthy "waaahh what about the whiiite mayuuuuun" idiocy (and that's what it is - nothing else). If a man-baby has issues with women, queer people or people of colour merely existing on-screen (as none of those characteristics are a plot-point in DSC), then that's not criticism. I don't have to spell out what it truly is. I can wholeheartedly claim, however, that it's despicable.

You will seldom get this kind of vitriol from me regarding anything else (I'm way too bubbly and cheery for that), but people being bigoted for no other reason than said bigotry ticks me off something fierce. Trek does not need that kind of "fan".
 
Last edited:
Don't bother talking to someone like that, @Ovation. Really, do not bother.

The moment someone mentions any of this utterly ridiculous, whiny, entitled, bullshit nonsense (you may also call it a dog-whistle), it's time to nope out of the "conversation" (it has since stopped being one) at ludicrous speeds. There is nothing you can say or do to reach someone who's having a pathetic man-baby tantrum just because a piece of media dares to actually have the temerity to cast people who don't all look alive. We all know that's what it's about when anyone - anyone - starts vomiting this mock-worthy "waaahh what about the whiiite mayuuuuun" idiocy (and that's what it is - nothing else). If a man-baby has issues with women, queer people or people of colour merely existing on-screen (as none of those characteristics are a plot-point in DSC), then that's not criticism. I don't have to spell out what it truly is. I can wholeheartedly claim, however, that it's despicable.

You will seldom get this kind of vitriol from me regarding anything else (I'm way too bubbly and cheery for that), but people being bigoted for no other reason than said bigotry ticks me off something fierce. Trek does not need that kind of "fan".
I have no plans to continue the “discussion” (was only four or five posts anyway and some others on the board were supportive). I mostly engaged at all because such drivel needs to be objected to in front of others, but it’s not a full time job. Besides, if I kept it up over there, I’d miss the fun around here. ;) :beer:
 
Don't bother talking to someone like that, @Ovation." Really, do not bother.

The moment someone mentions any of this utterly ridiculous, whiny, entitled, bullshit nonsense (you may also call it a dog-whistle), it's time to nope out of the "conversation" (it has since stopped being one) at ludicrous speeds. There is nothing you can say or do to reach someone who's having a pathetic man-baby tantrum just because a piece of media dares to actually have the temerity to cast people who don't all look alive. ...".
Heh..
You talking bout Trek or Walking Dead.
:nyah:
 
I really don't know what to make of this episode. The highlight was Ethan Peck as Spock who felt more as the character than Zachary Quinto did. I really liked the recap of The Cage. Talos IV was good, but that the Talosians were depicted by men took some of the character out of them and I felt something... lacking about them.

I don't like that virtually all of later Star Trek is about tampering with the timeline. I'm sick of it. This episode again shows that Michael (one of the least likeable characters in ST lore) would've died had it not been by the actions of the Red Angel and who is trying to change the future

I'd rate it 7/10.
 
Wow, another very good episode of Discovery! This might be my new favorite episode of the show. Thinking about it, this season has been quite the up 'n' down turbolift/rollercoaster ride for me, with strong episodes like “Brother”, “New Eden”, “The Sound of Thunder” and now “If Memory Serves” almost taking turns with more mediocre (“An Obol for Charon” or “Light and Shadows”) or downright bad episodes (“Point of Light”). In general though, the show feels much stronger and more focused than it did in season one. I hope this trend continues.

Right from the get-go – with its retro “Previously on Star Trek” montage (which positively startled me) – “If Memory Serves” felt like a very special episode. I feel like they went all in this time on touching upon the fans' nerd sensibilities, and I'm glad they did. Everything felt right for me, Talos IV, the Talosians, Vina, Pike and Spock.

I must say I immediately fell in love with Peck's portrayal of Spock! What a great performance. I already love him much more than Quinto's Spock, which wasn't bad, but never stopped to remind me that it wasn't Nimoy-Spock I'm seeing. For some reason Peck instantly registers as the original to me. I hope he sticks around much longer on the show.

Is that the access who plays L'Rell as the female Talosian?
Interesting. My wife asked the same thing. Her voice was very similar, wasn't it? But apparently it was another actress.

I believe I spotted Lieutenant Nilsson, aka the first Airiam actress Sara Mitich, in this episode. If that was her that I spotted, she even had dialogue.
Yes, I'm glad they finally gave her some lines. Would be neat if they expand upon her character. I don't know what it is about her performance that I like so much, but somehow I thought her Airiam was way more interesting. I feel that Cheesman plays her much more robot-like, which takes away from the mystique, I think.

I feel this episode did what a good prequel should do; adding details, context, and meaning to what came before. I came away from the episode feeling excited about this show.
Yes, this was the best kind of prequel they can do. They already did a similar thing back in “Lethe” where they added interesting context to the complicated relationship between Sarek and Spock. What they did in “If Memory Serves” nicely complements what we knew of Vina's and Pike's story from “The Cage” and “The Menagerie”.

(And her gloating about Genocide still has me wondering why she's getting her own show)
This had me rolling my eyes as well. Way to destroy the little bits of sympathy the audience might have developed for her over the course of the last couple of episodes.

I agree on the first point. I found that scene to be heartwrenching. And while it does change my opinion of her, it really makes me like her more as a character. I like it when good people do shitty things for what they believe to be the right (but ultimately wrong) reasons. To me, that's the core of great character development. It's Xander telling Buffy to kill Angel.
Nicely put. The scene was written and acted pretty well by all involved. This was also the first time I didn't dislike the young actor who's playing Spock as a child. Very impressive emoting going on in his face in this scene.

The two things that annoyed me about this episode were the lighting (too many damned lens flares) and the camera angles. It felt very strange on Discovery at times.
I agree. While I loved the writing and performances in this one, the directing felt a little off in some places. The lense flares on Talos IV and in the Burnham flashbacks worked pretty well, because they fit the theme of illusions, but why the hell would they film Saru and Pike with a fish eyes lense in the corridor, or employ a Dutch angle in the turbolift scene with Pike? I'm not saying the camera makes me dizzy or anything, but some of the creative choices called a little too much attention to themselves and were used in questionable instances.

Am I correct in my impression that they somehow made Vina a complete and total surprise? I had absolutely no expectation of seeing the character.

The characterization was spot-on. Great performance by the actress.
I would have LOVED to be surprised by Vina's appearance, hadn't Netflix pretty much spoiled it with their preview image of the episode, which shows Vina standing in front of the Talosians. :rolleyes:

I LOVED how they chose that specific insult because it ties into TOS' This Side of Paradise. Kirk uses that slur to anger Spock, and now we see why it works so well!
Yeah! I hadn't even thought about that, but yeah, it even adds context to that particular episode.

The Section 31 stuff. Why the fuck would Starfleet admirality trust them more than their own fleet, and their decorated Captain Pike? Especially considering how it's all about Spock. This makes no sense at all, and also makes S31 look rather incompetent - why do they pick an open fight with a Starfleet ship, instead of doing covert spy stuff? And why do they have the backing of the people they openly fight?
Yes, I was asking myself the same questions. Why does the admiralty of Starfleet task Section 31 with tracking down Spock? Why wouldn't they just mobilize the entire fleet (!) that's at their disposal? This is not even a problem of not fitting previous depictions of Section 31 in Star Trek. I just don't understand how they make any sense in how they are portrayed here.
 
Don't bother talking to someone like that, @Ovation. Really, do not bother.

The moment someone mentions any of this utterly ridiculous, whiny, entitled, bullshit nonsense (you may also call it a dog-whistle), it's time to nope out of the "conversation" (it has since stopped being one) at ludicrous speeds. There is nothing you can say or do to reach someone who's having a pathetic man-baby tantrum just because a piece of media dares to actually have the temerity to cast people who don't all look alike. We all know that's what it's about when anyone - anyone - starts vomiting this mock-worthy "waaahh what about the whiiite mayuuuuun" idiocy (and that's what it is - nothing else). If a man-baby has issues with women, queer people or people of colour merely existing on-screen (as none of those characteristics are a plot-point in DSC), then that's not criticism. I don't have to spell out what it truly is. I can wholeheartedly claim, however, that it's despicable.

You will seldom get this kind of vitriol from me regarding anything else (I'm way too bubbly and cheery for that), but people being bigoted for no other reason than said bigotry ticks me off something fierce. Trek does not need that kind of "fan".
What’s ironic is that I remember TNG/Berman-era Trek getting constantly bashed for being too “politically correct”...
 
I wonder if after the Enterprise has been repaired, we get a scene showing us that the Enterprise has been updated to the bridge we see in Kirk's time in charge.
 
People saying that young Burnam's exchange with young Spock, the one that supposedly caused the rift between them, wasn't sufficiently devastating need to watch the scene again. There is a lot more going on there than just her calling him a half breed.

She says some pretty damaging and horrible stuff in that context, and "half breed" isn't nearly the worst of it.
This. If someone I loved, someone I looked up to, someone who represented the world I could be a part of stared me directly in the eyes, told me I was inadequate, would never be anything I dreamed of being, and finished it off with words that said she didn't love me, I would be fucking devastated. I would question everything I thought about myself. The brutality of it is that we don't get to see Spock's actual wounds at a glance, as they're all emotional, but they're just as lasting and they run deep.
 
Hard same. A friend of mine in social work once told me (I promise this made sense in context) that people from, say, societies far removed from western influence rarely hallucinate Elvis when they check out for lunch.

In other words the terms in which we conceive of the world and project ourselves into it are as much products of existing cultural narratives as they are our internal ones.

There are prevailing power structures which are being confronted by a multitude of people in a multitude of ways in a multitude of settings. There's no denying that. Not all of these challenges are equivalent, certainly not all are good or useful or even necessarily benevolent of course. But many are all these things.

And of course there's the predictable, incorrigible reaction to change, which is where the scared white men come in. Narratives have formed which pit <insert dominant ruling class identity> against <anything else> in a very nationalist, xenophobic light.

I'm painting with a broad brush here but I find significant anecdotal overlap between those who think women are ruining video games, those who think immigrants are ruining society and hurting people, those who have irrational fears they'll be imprisoned for using the wrong gender, etc.

The common thread is feeling entitled to hold the sociopolitical and cultural reins, and only being able to conceive of this tension in reactionary, tribal, and violent terms because they aren't used to not getting what they want (in some important respects). If you've never had to compromise, the prospect might indeed seem terrifying.

Part of the solution though is characters like Pike portrayed by guys like Anson Mount. He's an exemplary white guy.
There's a meme which goes something like: why is the majority so hell-bent on trying to stay the majority? Could it be we don't treat minorities well here?

The moment anyone trots out SJW and they don't mean single Jewish woman, I'm skipping off to other, greener pastures.

Life's too short to argue with idiots.
 
Did you also have identity crises due to having weird species-changing surgery and then kill someone who got resurrected later? That turns people off a tad.

However we've already seen that some DIsco crew (Tilly, Detmer) WERE prepared to overlook that and sit with him. Guess the joining S31 thing revoked his "sit with redheads" card?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top