• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Discovery 2x05 - "Saints of Imperfection"

Hit it!


  • Total voters
    235
"Science fiction" is to broad a term in popular usage to mean anything now, although I do think it used to have a solid definition (or identity) before it became so popular from the media and special effects.
vvN2JJc.jpg

I agree. Originally it meant scantily clad women being attacked or rarely attacking bug eyed monsters and tentacle thingies.

giphy.gif

Progress!
 
So 20 years ago, Landry's shirt would have shed off as the tartigrade was crushing her rib cage, because of sexism, and 40 years ago she would have lost her trousers too, because of double sexism, and 60 years ago, she never would have been allowed to wear trousers, because of triple sexism?
 
"Science fiction" is to broad a term in popular usage to mean anything now, although I do think it used to have a solid definition (or identity) before it became so popular from the media and special effects.
Nah, It was everything from pulp stuff like Burroughs to the drier stuff like Asimov.
 
While I can't exactly place Star Trek's spot on the vast spectrum of Science Fiction, at least I can say that Michael Rennie was ill the day the earth stood still, but he told us where we stand
 
I wouldn't put it that way. All science fiction is real science fiction. Trek tends to be Science FICTION rather than SCIENCE Fiction.
Maybe "real" isn't the right term. However, I personally think there is a difference in the tern "science fiction and "sci-fi".
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top