Was anyone able to make a connection with the episode and the title? Why did they title this episode the way they did. Was also confused last week what Point of Light had to do with that episode.
^^^I really, really hope one of the things which is fixed in the post Berg-Harberts show is the sound mixing. It's been universally terrible so far, even in the great episodes this season. Dialogue is always mixed low, and music and/or ambient sounds are always playing at the same time people are speaking. It's really distracting, and makes me miss out on at least a few lines of dialogue every single episode.
You're wrong. If that were the case then any studio that wanted could do a TV series based on a popular comic book series and not worry about rights or royalties. If you use a specific character from a copyrighted work, you owe royalties.I think character credit royalties only apply when the character was written for TV, and if used again in TV that specific writer who created the character would be paid. I don't think the same applies to books or comics, since that is licensed out by the studio itself and whatever is created for those books and comics is already owned by the studio and not by the writers themselves. I could also very easily be wrong about this.
The impression I got was that the Kelpians believed that if they let this process go one, it would end in madness and horrible painful death; so the custom was for them to kill themselves to avoid that. It's more likely it's part of their biological maturation (IE prior to 'adulthood they retain the 'fear reflex' to survive to 'adulthood' where the Ganglia fall off naturally - but they retain their other abilities and strength.)
The - "This is the natural end of a Kelpians life, and if you let it go all the way a Kelpian will just go insane and die painfully..." was a myth spread by the Baul(ssp?) so that they wouldn't have Kelpians with the ability (and desire) to fight back and change the way things are - and further the 'Priests' (like Saru's father) would just reinforce this so AS SOON as a Kelpian showed these symptoms they would immediately commit ritual suicide - so no Kelpian knows the truth.
I noticed that as well. Maybe on the way she went to check up on them.A note about "Engineering"... in the episode they said the "spore room" wasn't part of main engineering, but when Michael said she was going to engineering to help with the shields she showed up there... and when the bridge calls engineering, Stamets or Tilly answers from the "spore room".
Needs to be renamed Revenge of the sporesJust to avoid confusion, you mean "The Paradise Syndrome."
"This Side of Paradise" is the one with the spores.
But Sarus' father was still alive, he still had his ganglia..I think.got the impression that all Kelpians wind up getting harvested before their threat ganglia fall off naturally, so none of them ever knew that they can continue beyond that final supposed near-death “Vaharai” experience
Do you believe humans will be speaking in modern U.S. English 250 years from now? There's authenticity for the sake of immersion, and then there's just disconnecting from your audience and making it more difficult for them to anchor their ability to relate to the crew. Plus, David Bowie is timeless, his words poignant, and as a clearly intelligent woman, Tilly probably finds comfort and solace, a connection in his words as he sings, the emotion in his voice, the message of his protagonists bravery as he hurls himself into the void with no hope of ever returning home, because Tilly knows that even though he sacrificed himself to further humanity's outward expansion, they made it. She's living proof.
We live in the digital age, where music doesn't die because it is shared across the world, and will be taken with us should we reach the stars.
One of my favorite songs, Spirit in the Sky by Norman Greenbaum, is already 50 years old. Is it really that far fetched?
Was anyone able to make a connection with the episode and the title? Why did they title this episode the way they did. Was also confused last week what Point of Light had to do with that episode.
Exactly. My thinking was that more with the sphere, it was paying it's fare (in the form of disbursing all it had learned and observed) before it completely passed away.Charon's obol is a term that the Greeks used for a coin placed in the mouth of a dead person as their fare to cross the River Styx. Given this episode is - to a large degree - about death (both the literal death of the sphere creature, and the fake-out death of Saru) it's somewhat understandable. I'm not sure what is supposed to symbolically be the "fare" for the passage of the dead though. Perhaps for the sphere creature, it's the knowledge that it hasn't died without imparting everything it learned. This is also reflective of the discussion Saru has on his deathbed, entrusting Micheal with his logs - all of the knowledge he personally has accumulated.
You're wrong. If that were the case then any studio that wanted could do a TV series based on a popular comic book series and not worry about rights or royalties. If you use a specific character from a copyrighted work, you owe royalties.
Stamets has apparently never been intended to be the "proper" Chief Engineer.Wait, did I misunderstood something or did Reno say that somebody else was chief engineer, not Stamets?
Yes, she said the Chief Engineer (whomever that may be) told her to (do whatever she came to spore-engineering to do). Or at least, that is what I heard.
The multiple theories on the layout of Engineering and the command hierarchy seem to be bit by bit confirmed; that there is an actual Chief Engineer that we've never seen and that the Spore-drive control room is an Engineering Lab (mentioned in like one line in first season) or also-known-as Starboard(?) Engineering? I've seen this in other threads but don't recall which parts of dialogue it was mentioned.
I love linus!!! I want to see a caitian now!
![]()
Una McCormick might take issue with that name being called stupid.![]()
They should name her Una McCormick in tributeI should clarify...the reasoning for calling her Una in the novels was ridiculously stupid in my opinion.
Mount's delivery was so good, I will forgive them.I feel like they're poking fans over the whole Klingon subtitles thing.
Worst moment of the episode when they brought that up. It's franchise management, not storytelling. I'd rather they just say "this is what TOS looks like now, deal with it."
Just rolling the credits would be an improvement over last week.Overall a much better episode than last week's.
Why? As has been pointed out pop culture references abound in the other shows. The difference between classical and pop in the passage of time.The pop culture references feel weird. The other shows didn’t really have them which made sense since it’s 400 years into our future.
Then he wasn't paying attention to "the Paradise Syndrrome".Ron Moore has said that he intended, but intentionally did not specify, that the ancient aliens we saw in The Next Generation's The Chase were the Preservers.
Is interesting how some say it was too fast and other say it was too fast.thought it was a step up from last week, but paced way too fast. not sure the saru/burnham arc is quite where the writers want it to be emotionally, but i appreciate that it’s good feelings they’re trying to convey rather than antagonism like a lot of season 1.
i like what they’re doing here, so i’m going with it.
In group setting sometimes you have to bend to the will of the majority.I don't understand why you'd pick mushrooms off a pizza instead of just not getting them in the first place.
Good episode. Fingers tightly crossed that the show doesn't falter.
20 somethings who like Beethoveen?How many present day 20 something year old humans have a 300 year old song as their favourite? That scene was too corny
Aren't there multiple refererances rto English being spoken in Star Trek?But the point is, for that reason, we have no idea that "Federation Standard" even is English. It's just depicted that way onscreen.
Was anyone able to make a connection with the episode and the title? Why did they title this episode the way they did. Was also confused last week what Point of Light had to do with that episode.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.