• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Discovery 1x02 - "Battle at the Binary Stars"

Rate the episode...


  • Total voters
    313
Yeoh should have been the main captain. I like her much more than Isaac.

Still can't believe they killed her this early. She was a major selling point for me. Her and Sonnequa are great. Really am not digging the stupid orange alien (Doug Jones) and the AWFUL new purple sparkly Klingons
We haven't really seen Lorca yet. So, it's kind of hard to judge.
 
In TMP, Ilia was attempting to use "navigational deflectors" to deflect the asteroid in the wormhole. That failed because the wormhole overloaded the main power systems.

In "Mudd's Women," deflectors were used to protect Mudd's ship at range from asteroid collisions when he was trying to escape into an asteroid belt. That burned out the lithium crystals, but that was because Mudd was running away and not cooperating.

They tried to push the large asteroid with a deflector beam in "The Paradise Syndrome." That too failed and burned out circuits, but that was something huge enough to wipe out all life on the planet.

@cultcross got it right. They could have used the Trek tech in some reasonable way to assist in this situation. They could have even sent other people, like a couple of security guards, with the First Officer. But no, they had to have a Dramatic Moment and create Dramatic Tension when she was doubted at first that there were even Klingons.

So every time they have tried it, it has failed or burned out the deflector, and that was with the state of the art Connie (or refit)? Got it. Actually, I agree. It would have been the perfect use for it. I didn't think to use it, and apparently neither did the writers. But that still doesn't mean it would have worked at that distance. Plus for just a scouting mission to do a flyby of the object, I don't think sending Burnham alone was the greatest idea, but neither were they planning on sending her into a fight.

Or Lorca is and has recruited people into whatever mission he's on, using his authority as a Starfleet captain. The crew are clueless and will find out as the season goes on.

In any case, it feels to me that these two first episodes are effectively the opening teaser to the DS9 series premiere "Emissary". This is Burnham's Wolf 359, which she tried and failed to do the right thing, and becoming a PTSD-addled survivor who has to surmount massive emotional trauma when sent on her next assignment. It was a big, flashy opener, laying out in graphic detail WHY Burnham is a hardened but vulnerable mess, but next week is when the show REALLY gets down to business, using her upbringing AND this incident in her role as the gateway character to the main story arc.

Mark

Agreed, i like it.
 
None nearby - this was on the far border of Federation space - they sent what was in the vicinity.
That's how Starfleet distributes ships: there are either sectors with ships but no Constitution classes, and sectors in which there is only the Enterprise that can respond.
 
It's entirely possible I am getting more sensitive to is as I get older, and I just want to enjoy things. Craig Mazin has a thing he's been trying called Positive Moviegoing, and it is kind of where my headspace is at lately:

Totally. I do the exact same thing. I feel like at any given time I have a single hate watch that I just can't quit for some reason ("Gotham" is the current holder of that title), but everything else, if I respond to the idea enough to make the decision to see it, I show up ready to embrace it on it's own terms. I also found I've stopped trying to get ahead of things and predict twists. I'm much happier to just go along with the story and then be AMAZED when there's a twist, even if it's something five-years-ago-me would have seen coming a mile away.

In that spirit, I never would have guessed this:

So I've been thinking... (Because, you know, I certainly wasn't working.) I don't think Georgiou and T'Kuvma are dead dead.

I think they're setting up that Klingon ship as having some kind of "mystical" (for lack of a better term) power - like the caskets and ceremonial "transition" play more into a literal translation of Sto-vo-kor. Certainly the concept of some kind of non-corporeal ethereal realm isn't new to Star Trek.

And the show has already proven it's willing to dive into the metaphysical.

I thought the choice at the end to leave Georgiou body on the ship seem oddly specific and beyond any thematic purpose.

Now that you point it out, the body being left behind really does feel like setup. I think you're onto something with this.

It must be the prosthetics because previous actors playing Klingons had no problem rambling off Klingonese (even with those crazy fangs in their mouths, unless the style of their teeth changed as well).

Anyone watch "Face Off" on SyFy? The prosthetic makeup competition show. Glenn Hetrick is one of the judges on that, and he designed the makeup for Discovery. He's always ripping the contestants apart for prosthetics that inhibit the actors performance. Take your own critique, Glenn!

I'd also say, we've never seen actors perform THIS MUCH dialogue in Klingon before. That makes it a lot harder.

I also wonder about the precedent for other aliens. Klingon has been a full language forever. But every time we see another species on their own ship, do we need a new language for them to converse in? Someone else mentioned the few times we did this with the Ferengi on DS9 and ENT, and how badly that played. Performing in prosthetics is extremely difficult, performing in a made up language is even moreso, they are really setting an incredibly high bar for these alien performances to be successful.

I guess these are boom times for the inventors of fantasy-or-alien-languages. An industry on the rise!
 
Yet they understood that it was a real possibility that the Federation communications satellite had been intentionally damaged to lure the ship into an ambush? Seriously?

Yeah, seriously. It was a possibility. Georgiou didn't dismiss it. But they didn't have any evidence of hostiles in the area and her mission was specifically a flyby. There was no indication that there would be conflict.

Also, two other points. One, it was a science mission. Two, even if they were planning it along the lines of a tactical mission, there is a tradeoff - the more stuff you send (additional crew, a shuttle, weaponry) the larger your signal is and the more chance you will be detected and draw fire or interest. Keeping the flyby low profile could be sound (though I would think a minimum of two people should be required; though they directly address that via dialogue).
 
Yeah, seriously. It was a possibility. Georgiou didn't dismiss it. But they didn't have any evidence of hostiles in the area and her mission was specifically a flyby. There was no indication that there would be conflict.
No, I can't agree with that. It's not an indication of imminent conflict, but the blasted satellite isn't no indication of conflict, either. The flyby itself was risky enough anyway, and she shouldn't have been sent alone. There are other members of the crew besides the science officer who could have gone in with her to offer back-up.
 
Yeah, I didn't get why she went alone, either. Especially after the captain tried to volunteer Saru.
 
No, I can't agree with that. It's not an indication of imminent conflict, but the blasted satellite isn't no indication of conflict, either. The flyby itself was risky enough anyway, and she shouldn't have been sent alone. There are other members of the crew besides the science officer who could have gone in with her to offer back-up.

The entire discussion between Burnham and Saru centered on that they didn't have enough evidence either way to say that the satellite was attacked. If it was just an asteroid strike, it would definitely be an indication of "no conflict".

But I agree, that at no point should there be EVA with a single person. Always two minimum. But you lose some dramatic tension and I guess I am ok with them bending this rule. It's TV, they bend so many rules for drama.
 
I might be in the minority, I enjoyed the first episode more than the second, the Klingon scenes did not keep my attention, the typical Admiral Stupid in the show who continue to make Starfleet look like its run by idiots. (No wonder some fans think only humans run the fleet, why would a sensible Vulcan, fiery Andorian and sarcastic Tellarite join these bozos?).
6/10 for Episode 2, hope it gets better next week.
 
Overall, pretty good. Although admittedly:
Them killing off Michelle Yeoh in the freaking pilot was hugely disappointing and kind of soured me on this episode to a degree. What a waste.
 
Well, I agree with you totally! On the show, I loved it also. Saru was great, I can't believe how well that expository prey-species backstory dialogue played. (Though I did keep thinking: damn, Doug Jones is such a unique physicality, this is going to be tough on the casting people if we someday need more Kelpian characters that fit with his look)

I haven't perceived the consensus to be as negative, though... maybe I am employing my scrolling finger more aggressively. I am starting to see one great plus to having to pay for CBSAA -- those that really hate it will not pay and thus not be able to post overly negative rants. :)

I think their is a difference between trolling and nitpicking or dislike but I have always seen everything as usually nitpicking/dislike more than the other thing. I don't ever get the feeling that people are lying about their opinions which to me is the big difference. PLus their is abit of repetition that I think makes it feel worst maybe than it is. If you got 5 threads talking about the show your going to have 5 places were someone might voice some complaints and then he complaints vary so if you got only 3 about the klingons and 3 about the unifroms and 3 about the ship then even though each era only has 3 complaints if you combine it on a whole you have 9 different complaints.

Jason
 
If the war is as bad as it seems, than the whole "only starship in the quadrant" routine might be a consequence of the war. Starfleet losing so many ships that they have to spread what they have left out to absurd levels, but try to keep their better ships (which we might assume are the Constitutions) within high warp speed range of as many places as possible because the rest of Starfleet just can't make it in time and defend the Klingon border.
 
What I am curious about is why would she not go to live with her grandparents or a aunt or something after her parents died? I wonder if they will explain this. Also I am confused. Did she go to Starfleet Academy because when she arrives she is wearing a Vulcan outfit and hairstyle that doesn't prove anything but I think it does supose to make you think she has been living on Vulcan.

Jason
 
What I am curious about is why would she not go to live with her grandparents or a aunt or something after her parents died? I wonder if they will explain this. Also I am confused. Did she go to Starfleet Academy because when she arrives she is wearing a Vulcan outfit and hairstyle that doesn't prove anything but I think it does supose to make you think she has been living on Vulcan.

Jason
Who says she has living grandparents or an aunt?
 
Yeah, what Nerys said. My grandmother raised me -- that was it, there weren't any others. Sometimes that happens. Burnham might not have had any other familial paths available.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top