I think I like it more than you do, but it's a bizarre way to try to get people to pay for a streaming service.
^This. I won't say it's bad. I've seen worse Star Trek, lol, BUT if I'm to buy a service to see it, it should be terrific. It wasn't. It was flashy, with dull spots, unexplained oddball Klingons speaking fantasy language throughout, & a wide range of characters I didn't connect with at all.
Nothing about Discovery ever indicated that it was going to be an "exploration" show.
Except the title lol
For the most part, there was very little in this episode that was worthy of criticism.
I have to disagree. The look, while expensive & flashy was irritating. Maybe it passes on the big screen, but here it's a chore imho, especially the "Glitchy" holographs
Sarek did nothing for me, which takes a lot of failure. I LOVE Sarek, & frankly, if there's any race/culture in all of Star Trek that needs less fleshing out of their story than Vulcans, it's Klingons, even ones they give new flesh. I have no interest in an arc about an early Klingon/Starfleet war. That said, I won't rain on anyone's parade further, but "little worthy of criticism"? Hardly.
Most importantly, it's a bad launch if the goal is to transplant viewers onto a new paid medium. I, for one, don't plan to do so. They needed to do better than this to draft me. If I hear it improves, maybe I'll buy the collection eventually, but the streaming service? Pass. It's not cheapness. It's feeling like I've not been offered enough to merit going that extra length. Throwing Trek's name on something does not merit my support by default.