I mean they (TF2 Spoliers, stop reading if you care!!) killed off Optimus Prime briefly during the wonderful movie 'Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen' in an obvious nod to the 1986 Tranformers movie. Everyone with any kind of Transformers knowledge knows that Optimus dies in that movie.
Point is that we have the same writers working on Trek 2012 and they might kill off Spock in the next movie. Once again most people who have watched Trek over the last 30 years are going to be aware of Spocks death and subsequent resurrection based on TWOK and TSFS.
Will they pull the same trick in Trek 12? I think so.
Will they have to use Trek 13 to bring him back, will they leave him dead or will he be resurrected by the Borg or something? Who knows. (well Orci and Kurtzman actually)
Spock dying is canon.You know I've noticed a pattern in Trek movie speculation since Abrams has become involved.
In Trek XI it was speculated the Spock Prime would die.
In Trek XII it is being speculated that NuSpock will die.
I ask you what has Spock ever done to you people that you want him to die?![]()
No one major is dying in the next film. This isn't the Berman Film Series where you have to kill major characters to for the film to have "deep meaning" and you don't have the actor playing Spock tempted back into the role only by a juicy scene.
No one major is dying in the next film. This isn't the Berman Film Series where you have to kill major characters to for the film to have "deep meaning" and you don't have the actor playing Spock tempted back into the role only by a juicy scene.
Berman was involved in Star Trek II and III? Didn't know that.
Given that Spock is hugely popular and Quinto seems to be embracing both the franchise and his predecessor, it seems extremely unlikely that Spock is ever going to die again. He only died first time because at that point in his life Nimoy was trying to draw a line under Spock - they tempted him back with the promise of directing the next movie.
Would have loved to see the TOS movies go on without Spock. Also would have loved to see the Excelsior being Kirk's new ship. And not killing off David would have also been awesome. Yet they always pushed the big red button and brought Spock back, brought the Enterprise back and got rid of Kirk's son.
Now that they rebooted, I think they really should take the chance to do unusual stuff. They destroyed Vulcan, fine. But now they have the opportunity to really go new way with the characters. If they don't do it, then I don't understand the need for a reboot at all.
Orci (or was it Quinto) already said that it's highly probable they forget about the Spock/Uhura thing by the next movie. They will probably not even mention the aftermath of Vulcan's destruction once. So it's again same old, same old.
. . it is just a very vocal minority who don't want anything to change from the holy writ of TOS that are screaming the loudest about Spock and Uhura. . .
~FS
They are going to keep on with the Spock/Uhura thing because of the demographic it attracts. Remember that a movie like Star Trek needs to be appealing to all 'Four Quadrants' to be a success when taking into consideration the amount of money they spend on it.
Star Trek needs to throw a bone to the female demos and that is why they did Spock/Uhura. If the death of Optimus Prime was to 'sell toys' as a poster indicated earlier then Spock/Uhura is selling Trek to teen/tween girls
They are going to throw Spock/Uhura in our faces again whether we want it or not and Spocks death or near dying or whatever means there will be something for Uhura to do.
Wow. . . that's a really limited and sad view of what Uhura can be as a character.
. . . it is just a very vocal minority who don't want anything to change from the holy writ of TOS that are screaming the loudest about Spock and Uhura. . .
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.