Quite right. If they'd changed all the names there would be no connection.Why are we still thinking in terms of Trek?
The logic or appeal of having a sword fight on a dangling space platform escapes me.
---------------
Quite right. If they'd changed all the names there would be no connection.Why are we still thinking in terms of Trek?
Look at this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GM02Hejw02s
And look at the platform.
They went all the way to the bottom of that drill:
Looks pretty similar to me. I say it's plausible.
Well, here's my problem.....
What SHOULD be the standard for the new movie? Do we really want to use past screwups as precedent for future screwups?
That's really been my biggest frustration with dealing with the people who are over the moon about the new movie....if I bring up a point, they always try to combat it with, "Well, such and such version of Trek did something just as stupid, too."
So?
Forget the Sears Tower in Chicago -- that is only 2000 feet above sea level. Denver Colorado is over 5000 feet (one mile) above sea level, and the last time I checked, the people who live there could breathe just fine.To me, it looks like the top two images really aren't all that high off the ground. Hell, drop the Sears tower in the middle of the badlands, and that's probably what the view from the observation deck would look like. I've seen views from popular base-jumping cliffs that afforded similar views, and they weren't nearly so high as to necessitate bottled oxygen or special breathing gear.
The logic or appeal of having a sword fight on a dangling space platform escapes me.
So why aren't we complaining about the floating city of Stratos in The Cloud Minders?
Those balconies on Stratos the were "open air":
http://tos.trekcore.com/gallery/albums/3x21/TheCloudMinders0288.jpg
trekkerguy,
Just where CAN I buy a Jesus-fish with warp nacelles?![]()
Well, here's my problem.....
What SHOULD be the standard for the new movie? Do we really want to use past screwups as precedent for future screwups?
That's really been my biggest frustration with dealing with the people who are over the moon about the new movie....if I bring up a point, they always try to combat it with, "Well, such and such version of Trek did something just as stupid, too."
So?
Yes. Is this a Star Wars movie? I've seen that already.Ever seen Star Wars?The logic or appeal of having a sword fight on a dangling space platform escapes me.
the lack of breathing aides in this scene was a big red flag for me... I mean, looking at those screencaps, they are ABOVE Vulcan's cloud level.
And consider, when you are skydiving, your are still going DOWN, not remaining at one level, so your oxygen becomes more available, as you go further down.
Yes. Is this a Star Wars movie? I've seen that already.Ever seen Star Wars?The logic or appeal of having a sword fight on a dangling space platform escapes me.
I guess a lot of movies have appealed to a lot of people, but I was kind of hoping for a Star Trek movie this time. Oh well...Star Wars, with its propensity for sword fights in the vicinity of inexplicably located bottomless pits in direct violation of all conceivable Occupational Health & Safety regulations, obviously appeals to a great many people.
So why aren't we complaining about the floating city of Stratos in The Cloud Minders?
Those balconies on Stratos the were "open air":
http://tos.trekcore.com/gallery/albums/3x21/TheCloudMinders0288.jpg
So why aren't we complaining about the floating city of Stratos in The Cloud Minders?
Those balconies on Stratos the were "open air":
http://tos.trekcore.com/gallery/albums/3x21/TheCloudMinders0288.jpg
Because the crew didn't fly to that city in the air, outside of a vehicle, nor did they engage in rigorous physical combat, where you would be breathing rapidly and heavily.
.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.