• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

So What Are you Reading?: Generations

I finished reading The Art of Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 yesterday, and if you're a fan of the movie I highly recommend checking it out. The featured concept art is gorgeous, and we nice insights from the creative team into what went into the design process. And once that was done, I went back to The Lives of Dax, and I just finished the Emony story, and am now starting the Audrid story. So really enjoyed all of the stories so far, they've all been very different, and very good.
 
Finished The Beheading Game by Rebecca Lehmann. I couldn't put it down. Anne Boleyn wakes in a sword chest after her execution, escapes from it (carrying her head) and makes her way to Southwick where she acquires a needle and thread and sews her head back on. From thence, adventure follows.
 
Last edited:
Finished The Beheading Game by Rebecca Lehmann. I couldn't put it down. Anne Boleyn wakes in a sword chest after her execution, escapes from it (carrying her head) and makes her way to Southwick where she acquires a needle and thread and sews her head back on. From thence, adventure follows.
That's a cool concept. Let me add this to my TBR.
 
Bizarre concept. But no more so than Colson Whitehead's novel of a few years ago, that used the conceit of the Underground Railroad being a literal railroad, that literally ran underground.

I just finished my re-read of To Defy Fate. With regard to that book, and SNW 3x09: "Terrarium," @The Wormhole said:
You'll note that novel actually does have a vague reference to this episode.

This time through, I only caught one glaringly obvious syntax error that the copy-editor(s) and/or proofreader(s) missed (and the whole time I was reading it, both times, I was never more than 30 seconds away from a pad of Post-It Notes; why didn't I use them on the train!), but this time I did catch the "vague reference to 'Terrarium'."
 
Last edited:
I finished a reread of Why Didn't They Ask Evans? for an Agatha Christie challenge on Goodreads. It remains a 2 star read for me. If anyone is really curious about the title, I am happy to DM them the explanation (or it is probably on Wikipedia, too) and save hundreds of pages of reading. She has many better books in her stable.
 
If anyone is really curious about the title, I am happy to DM them the explanation (or it is probably on Wikipedia, too) and save hundreds of pages of reading.

The non-spoilery explanation is that those were the victim's last words and the key lies in figuring out what he meant.
 
I finished a reread of Why Didn't They Ask Evans? for an Agatha Christie challenge on Goodreads. It remains a 2 star read for me. If anyone is really curious about the title, I am happy to DM them the explanation (or it is probably on Wikipedia, too) and save hundreds of pages of reading. She has many better books in her stable.
The adaptation is on BritBox. It isn't that good, so I'm not surprised you didn't care for the novel.
 
I recently finished watching the animated series Pantheon on Netflix, so I decided to read the Ken Liu short stories it was adapted from, six of which are in Liu's collection The Hidden Girl and Other Stories, with the earliest story in that continuity, "Carthaginian Rose," being in an anthology called Empire of Dreams and Mirages. The series is mainly based on the 3-part series consisting of "The Gods Will Not Be Chained," "The Gods Will Not Be Slain," and "The Gods Have Not Died In Vain," while the final episode draws on elements of the story "Seven Birthdays." The show has little in common with the other three stories, "Carthaginian Rose," "Staying Behind," and "Altogether Elsewhere, Vast Herds of Reindeer," aside from the general concept and setting and a couple of details. They're all short stories or novelettes, so I was able to read all seven in two sittings this afternoon and early evening.

What surprised me was how much of the show was not from the stories. The first episode is largely a very faithful adaptation of the early scenes of "Not Be Chained," and the overall story provides the arc of much of the first season, but it's mainly focused on the character of Maddie and her family (who were named Wynn in the stories, rather than Kim as in the show), with passing mention of the characters Laurie Lowell and Chanda (whose first name is Nils rather than Vinod and is a rather different character). The plot diverges heavily as the series goes on, with the main commonality with the latter two "Gods" stories being the character of Mist. Startlingly, everything in the show involving Caspian, his family, Stephen Holstrom, and Julius Pope is completely original. I'd expected to find out that maybe they were from a different set of stories and Craig Silverstein combined them into one narrative, but no, they're all-new. None of the characters outside the "Gods" trilogy are incorporated into the show, although the actions of the protagonist in "Seven Birthdays" are performed by Maddie in the show.

All in all, I think the TV series is probably an improvement on the stories. It incorporates many of the same ideas and character threads, but adds a lot of new, rich storylines and SF concepts that feel mostly as smart and plausible as the ones in Liu's stories. Although there's one element in the stories that I found very implausible. They posit that uploading human minds into digital existence uses far less resources than living, embodied humans, so that humanity giving up bodily existence to live as software in data centers would allow the environment to heal. But we've seen in recent years that large data centers consume massive amounts of power and are terrible for the environment. (Also, who repairs and maintains them and their power plants if all humans become virtual? Well, robots, I guess.)
 
Between work, and my mom and I both having doctor's appointments I've been mostly reading digital comics the last few days. I've read Hawkeye Vol. 3: LA Woman written by Matt Fraction with art by Annie Wu and Javier Pulido. This was a ton of fun, I've really liked Kate in earlier volumes, so I really enjoyed the focus on her here. The storyline was lot of fun, her conflict with Madame Masque and her minions was good, and they introduced a great new supporting cast for Kate here. I'm really hoping that at least some of them pop back up in the later series with Kate in LA.
After that I read the Star Trek: Classics edition of TNG: The Gorn Crisis. This was actually my second time reading, but I didn't remember it, and it was next up in my chronological read and reread of the Enterprise-E era TNG stories. I enjoyed the story a lot, but the art was kind of weird. I noticed the weird art seemed to be a big trend with the Wildstorm issues, we had this, DS9: N-Vector and TNG: Forgiveness, all with strange artwork, and then I also found some of the page layouts in VOY: Planet Killer kind of weird. I liked the look of Planet Killer's art, but the way it was actually put together on the page was kind of weird.
 
I'm reading at work, The River Has Roots. I heard it won a Nebula award, so I'm giving it a shot. Another title that won an award is Buffalo Hunter Hunter. But it's a full length novel, and I already have two going right now: Odyssey and Good People.

I'm half way through The River Has Roots, and it's basically a lot like Stardust, but it isn't as good as Stardust. There is also a non-binary character called Rin that isn't described. I have a really hard time picturing a character that is non-binary without a description, and it's hard to read text with a lot of they and them. I struggle with it.

At this point, it's not a recommend yet. It's a read Stardust instead. Or better, watch the film.
 
Sir Sherlock: The Red Letter Day, by Kenton Hall, adapting the audio drama by Gary Hopkins.

Sir Sherlock is a series of audio dramas set in the 1920s starring Tom Baker as Sir Sherlock Holmes (he's knighted as the series begins) and John Leeson as Dr. John Watson. The first in the series was offered on Kickstarter earlier this year, and the Kickstarter for the second, The Sickle and the Sea, launched this week. As part of the rewards for the first book a novelization was offered. Published by Chinbeard Books, it's a hardcover novella of about 20,000 words.

I probably should have listened to the audio first, but I read the novelization first instead. I might get to the audio in a few days.

I'm persnickety when it comes to Sherlock Holmes pastiches. If something feels off, I bail. Life is too short to read bad Sherlock Holmes fiction... unless it's so actively bad that I just have to witness a train wreck, which I have done. I'm not going to name and shame, sorry.

The Red Letter Day is not a train wreck. I don't feel that I wasted my time reading it, but it doesn't evoke much of a Sherlock Holmes feeling in me. John Watson has a voice, not just a character dialogue voice but a prose voice. Hall's prose didn't hit the Watson prose voice for me. But it was also short enough -- about 80 pages -- that I didn't mind too much and carried on. It was perfectly adequate.

Two Egyptologists from the British Museum are murdered and their bodies left by Cleopatra's Needle in London. Holmes, who is in London to be knighted, receives a cryptic missive (the "red letter" of the title) that starts him on an investigation. Along the way he meets a familiar friend -- Lord Lestrade -- and makes two new acquaintances, Lestrade's granddaughter Emily and a young consulting detective named Norton (portrayed, in the audio, by Young Sherlock Holmes' Nicholas Rowe) at various points. There's some deduction, a Holmes plan, and a thrilling and dangerous climax.

It's a pilot. I was discussing this in the Doctor Who forum this morning that pilots have to do several things -- introduce the concept, the setting, the characters, plant some seeds to be picked up on later, and, oh yeah, incidentally have a story as well on which to hang all of these. As a pilot, it's effective. While I didn't find the mystery itself terribly interesting -- like some of Doyle's Holmes stories, the point is not the mystery and clues that can lead the reader to work it out -- the longer term plot elements have their points of interest, and I would be curious to see how they develop across the series.

My main issue with the execution of the concept has to do with the ages of the protagonists. Holmes and Watson are in their seventies, and while the story makes some references to their ages and the times, it generally feels like they're in their forties and operating where "it's always 1895" in Vincent Starret's famous phrase. I much preferred the treatment of the elderly Holmes in Chabon's The Final Solution and Mitch Cullin's A Simple Trick of the Mind. If the audio series can grapple with the realities of a septuagenarian Holmes it could turn into something interesting.

That said, with Sherlock Holmes now fully public domain, there is a metric fuckton of new Sherlock Holmes fiction on the market, and Sturgeon's Law applies hard here. A marketable angle -- old Sherlock Holmes as portrayred by Tom Baker -- serves well to differentiate this project in the marketplace and gives it a commercial hook that other Holmes projects wouldn't necessarily have.

I'm curious to see how this project develops.
 
Sir Sherlock is a series of audio dramas set in the 1920s starring Tom Baker as Sir Sherlock Holmes (he's knighted as the series begins) and John Leeson as Dr. John Watson.

The Doctor and K9 as Holmes and Watson? That kind of fits.

Of course, Tom Baker is no newcomer to Holmes, as his very first project post-Who was a BBC adaptation of The Hound of the Baskervilles. (And the canine theme continues.)
 
The Doctor and K9 as Holmes and Watson? That kind of fits.
I'll let you know how they sound when I get to the audio. :)

Despite the Doctor Who connections to the project -- besides the actors, Chinbeard has also published some Doctor Who books, including the unlicensed War Doctor anthology Seasons of War, and I believe there are Big Finish people involved -- I didn't notice any Doctor Who references in the story itself.

Of course, Tom Baker is no newcomer to Holmes, as his very first project post-Who was a BBC adaptation of The Hound of the Baskervilles. (And the canine theme continues.)
It may surprise you, but I've not seen the Tom Baker Hound. I haven't seen the Stewart Grainger Hound with William Shatner, either.
 
It may surprise you, but I've not seen the Tom Baker Hound.

I saw it on BritBox a couple of years ago. I don't know if it's still there, though. It's very Who-like, a 4-part videotaped serial produced by Barry Letts and script-edited by Terrance Dicks, with Caroline John as Laura Lyons. There's not much distance between Baker's Holmes and his Doctor, but there's no real reason why there should be, since the characters have so much in common. I found him reasonably effective, but apparently Baker himself and the BBC were dissatisfied with his performance, which might be why they didn't continue the series.

The big disappointment for me is Terence Rigby's Watson, who comes off as a distracted fuddy-duddy and leaves a weak impression. One could have wished for a more compelling presence as Watson, both because so much of Hound focuses on Watson and because Tom Baker was such a dominating presence that he needed a worthier co-star to balance him.


I haven't seen the Stewart Grainger Hound with William Shatner, either.

I once saw Leonard Nimoy play a Holmes pastiche, on a PBS educational series called The Universe and I, an anthology of stories in eclectic styles teaching scientific ideas. It's hard to explain what the episode was about, but I don't have to, since it's on YouTube:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I once saw Leonard Nimoy play a Holmes pastiche, on a PBS educational series called The Universe and I, an anthology of stories in eclectic styles teaching scientific ideas. It's hard to explain what the episode was about, but I don't have to, since it's on YouTube:
Speaking of Nimoy's Holmes...

The last dozen years or so, I've noticed that some self-published Holmes books and comic books will use Jeremy Brett's Holmes on the cover, which annoys me as the literary character is in the public domain, Brett's likeness and performance as Holmes is not. Two or three years ago, Amazon suggested a Holmes pastiche to me that used Nimoy on the cover. I applaud the willingness to go in a different direction and infringe other copyrights! 🤦
 
Speaking of Nimoy's Holmes...

The last dozen years or so, I've noticed that some self-published Holmes books and comic books will use Jeremy Brett's Holmes on the cover, which annoys me as the literary character is in the public domain, Brett's likeness and performance as Holmes is not. Two or three years ago, Amazon suggested a Holmes pastiche to me that used Nimoy on the cover. I applaud the willingness to go in a different direction and infringe other copyrights! 🤦
Finding good public domain ebooks is tough. The last one I struggled with was finding the Katz translation for The Brothers Karamazov.

And today, I was looking for MIddlemarch alternatives to the StandardEBooks, and I saw the StandardEBooks cover on one being sold for $0.99.

eBooks is still the wild west even if it's a new translation of a public domain book.
 
Speaking of Nimoy's Holmes...

The last dozen years or so, I've noticed that some self-published Holmes books and comic books will use Jeremy Brett's Holmes on the cover, which annoys me as the literary character is in the public domain, Brett's likeness and performance as Holmes is not. Two or three years ago, Amazon suggested a Holmes pastiche to me that used Nimoy on the cover. I applaud the willingness to go in a different direction and infringe other copyrights! 🤦

There's a question... Are the original Sidney Paget illustrations in public domain too? If so, they could be used as cover art.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top