• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

So What Are you Reading?: Generations

I'm at the halfway point of The Warrior's Apprentice by Lois McMaster Bujold. The writing skill on display is incredible. She is economical in the way she tells the story, neither overwhelming nor boring the reader.
 
Or not. I came across this while googling one of the other stories in the collection. Lethem talks about the small town the story was set in and where Jackson spent some time, and what led to the story.

Jonathan Lethem on Shirley Jackson
I recommend this recent fanfic sequel to "The Lottery," "Why one small American town won’t stop stoning its residents to death." It purports to be a New Yorker article by Ian Chotiner, who is famous for his in-depth and sometimes very uncomfortable interviews (for the interviewee) of public figures. And, in this case, the Lottery has continued into the present day, the interviewee is a resident of the small town, and Chotiner grills him on the town's strange ritual
During our conversation, which has been edited for length and clarity, we discussed why he thinks the lottery is justified, evolving attitudes toward stoning, and what protections the state owes to children.
If you're read a Chotiner interview of three, it's very well done.
 
Trying to get my head around why JMS liked Bester enough to name character in B5 after him. There has to be something else that Bester wrote that pushed him to do that.
There was: The Demolished Man, which is all about telepathy. Straczynski pretty much lifted the entire structure of the Psi Cops from The Demolished Man. Indeed, every fictional portrayal of telepathy since 1953, from the X-Men to B5 to StarCraft owes a debt to Bester.
 
Indeed, every fictional portrayal of telepathy since 1953, from the X-Men to B5 to StarCraft owes a debt to Bester.

Which is an ambivalent legacy, because while I love Bester's writing style, I'm not a fan of the prevalence of telepathy in science fiction. (Although that was pushed largely by John W. Campbell, who was a believer.)
 
There was: The Demolished Man, which is all about telepathy. Straczynski pretty much lifted the entire structure of the Psi Cops from The Demolished Man. Indeed, every fictional portrayal of telepathy since 1953, from the X-Men to B5 to StarCraft owes a debt to Bester.

At one point, back in the seventies, Brian DePalma was going to direct a movie version, as a thematic follow-up to Carrie and The Fury. I used to have a paperback edition of the novel that proudly proclaimed on the cover: "Soon to be a Major Motion Picture from Brian DePalma."

I'm still waiting . . . .:)
 
Thanks for the recommendations.

I am almost done reading through Jeeves Stories from StandardEBooks. It compiles all of the Jeeves short stories up to Jeeves and the Yule-tide Spirit. I have already picked up Very Good, Jeeves to finish off this collection. Basically, I have read My Man, Jeeves; The Inimitable Jeeves; Carry On, Jeeves; and the beginning of Very Good, Jeeves. I highly recommend these stories. They have always cheered me up at lunch time at work.

Unfortunately, my library doesn't carry Thank You, Jeeves, so I set a price watch with ereaderiq.

And I'm at the last stretch of Parable of the Sower. It's well written, but it's down right depressing compared the Jeeves stuff.

Adding Angel Down to my holds list tonight. Library says at least 6 months, so maybe I can read it over the Christmas Holiday.
 
Finished Stars My Destination. Not really sure yet what I think about this book. I'm not sure I would recommend it. There isn't a lot of depth to the main character, and the twist isn't all that exciting. It's pretty middling. Trying to get my head around why JMS liked Bester enough to name character in B5 after him. There has to be something else that Bester wrote that pushed him to do that.

As others have pointed out, Bester’s The Demolished Man was the telepath novel. And I’m glad I’m old enough to have read The Stars My Destination when it was newer than Star Wars is now.

If you want to read books, where there is a high possibility that the author was on something, check out PKD.

The idea that PKD wrote a lot of his work under the influence of psychedelic drugs seems to have come from Harlan Ellison’s introduction to “Faith of Our Fathers” in Dangerous Visions. Dick was reportedly not amused. But if you want to read Dick on drugs (that is, writing on the subject of drugs), read A Scanner Darkly. And if you want to read a mind gradually deteriorating, due to amphetamine abuse, mental illness, and revelations from God and alien computers, read the five volumes of his Selected Letters.

The Demolished Man by Bester is all about telepathy and psychic cops. I always assumed that B5 name was a homage to that book, which Hollywood has been talking about making into a movie since the 1970s at least.

Yeah, JMS said so, as I recall.

I'm thinking of writing a story about the people who refuse to participate in a town's ritual of pelting a random citizen with eggs. I'm going to call it "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelets."

There’s never an oh my god eyeroll emoji when you need one. (I know, there probably is.)

Which is an ambivalent legacy, because while I love Bester's writing style, I'm not a fan of the prevalence of telepathy in science fiction. (Although that was pushed largely by John W. Campbell, who was a believer.)

Yeah, I remember when JMS was on Compuserve hyping B5 before it aired, talking about it as the most scientifically accurate space opera ever (he probably didn’t call it a space opera). I asked, okay, why telepaths? He said, lots of great SF writers used telepathy. I don’t recall if I pointed out that he’d moved the goalposts with that reply, but he was cranky about it. As much as I loved a lot of B5, JMS could be as full of shinola as everyone he criticized.
 
Yeah, I remember when JMS was on Compuserve hyping B5 before it aired, talking about it as the most scientifically accurate space opera ever (he probably didn’t call it a space opera). I asked, okay, why telepaths? He said, lots of great SF writers used telepathy. I don’t recall if I pointed out that he’d moved the goalposts with that reply, but he was cranky about it. As much as I loved a lot of B5, JMS could be as full of shinola as everyone he criticized.

The only decent science in B5 was the use of rotation for gravity and the realistic physics in the way the Starfury fighters maneuvered in space. And maybe using plasma handguns instead of energy beams. Everything else was just standard fanciful sci-fi tropes -- humanoid aliens, hyperspace with made-up rules, psi powers that do whatever the story requires, etc. And even more absurd stuff like the show's approach to "life energy" as some finite reservoir that determines a person's life expectancy, so that any disease can be cured just by topping someone up with a transfer of someone else's life energy. (In Keith DeCandido's Reactor reviews, he refers to the life-transfer machine as the Great Hit Point Redistributor.)

I'm not sure if JMS was knowingly making false claims about the science. I suspect it was just a case of believing the science was good because he didn't know enough about science to know how bad it was.
 
As I recall, he wanted to differentiate B5 from the fanciful SF of Star Trek… while doing pretty much all the same things, aside from Star Trek’s many alien/human hybrids.
 
As I recall, he wanted to differentiate B5 from the fanciful SF of Star Trek… while doing pretty much all the same things, aside from Star Trek’s many alien/human hybrids.

Which is weird, because at the time, Star Trek was the least fanciful thing in SFTV. It was practically the only show that used scientific consultants and attempted to be moderately plausible, aside from the poetic license required by storytelling needs and budgetary restrictions. Just knowing what the word "galaxy" meant and that you couldn't make interstellar journeys with conventional rockets (or a drifting Moon) put Star Trek far ahead of its competition in terms of credibility. The only other remotely credible American SFTV show I can think of from that era was the short-lived 1988 series Probe, co-created by Isaac Asimov, about an eccentric genius scientist solving scientific mysteries. So it's weird that he'd single out the show with the least fanciful science, comparatively, as his example of fanciful SF. It seems more like going after the top gunslinger to try to make one's name.

I mean, certainly it would've been possible to do a much more plausible show than ST, as we've seen with things like The Expanse. But man, B5 wasn't it.
 
Might just have been a marketing kind of thing, presenting B5 as not just a Star Trek knockoff... though I originally heard of B5 before "The Gathering" aired because JMS was a regular poster in Compuserve's trek forum.
 
Adding Angel Down to my holds list tonight. Library says at least 6 months, so maybe I can read it over the Christmas Holiday.

I was amazed to discover that our local library system had a single copy, which was listed as "Available."

I requested it immediately. With any luck, it will show up at our downtown branch by next week at the latest.

Apparently, the entire 304-page book is one long sentence!
 
Last edited:
The idea that PKD wrote a lot of his work under the influence of psychedelic drugs seems to have come from Harlan Ellison’s introduction to “Faith of Our Fathers” in Dangerous Visions. Dick was reportedly not amused. But if you want to read Dick on drugs (that is, writing on the subject of drugs), read A Scanner Darkly.
I watched the A Scanner Darkly movie with Johnny Depp, RDJ, Winona Ryder, and Woody Harrleson a while it, it was good.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top