• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

so the producers and writers said that discovery will lead into TOS (60's aesthetics and all)...

What I mean is that since we already know what the current bridge of Discovery looks like that it means that if they make changes the changes have to find a middle ground from what they are currently using to what Starfleet will be using in 10 years. I'm not sure a completely new Discovery bridge that instantly looks like that pic, even after more details is what should be done at first. In fact I might even argue that these changes should be more reflected in other Starfleet ships and bases before we start seeing huge changes to Discovery. Like I said above the graphics having more color would be a good start and then more brightness, then perhaps the front conn station and then more TOS style uniforms. If they could gradually work that in over the next few years I think it would be great but we shouldn't see the final product until maybe the last season I even think the last episode or even the last scene.

Jason
I was talking about showing an actual Constitution. The Discovery itself doesn't need any of those changes.
 
TOS is one of my favourite shows too, and it is also my Dad’s, and we both agree the aesthetic would not hold up today.

Don't agree. This was kind of disproven in the ENT IaMD episodes. In those episodes the Constitution class ship looked more advanced and futuristic that NX-01.
 
Don't agree. This was kind of disproven in the ENT IaMD episodes. In those episodes the Constitution class ship looked more advanced and futuristic that NX-01.

The exterior yes, but not the interior.

The interior looks cheap and very low tech.
 
The interior looks sleek and minimalist, which is the best aesthetic approach to futurism.

Kor
 
The interior looks sleek and minimalist, which is the best aesthetic approach to futurism.

Kor
The DSC stuff inside is still pretty minimum.

Seriously the TOS look will not work on modern TV without updating.

You can make something minimalist without looks like the 1960s.
 
ive read interviews from the producers and writers saying to give discovery a chance, and ride it out, and in the end it will lead into TOS aesthetically (meaning somehow, it will look exactly like how TOS did).

will the federation decide that they really liked the 1960's america style and to model everything (starfleet included) after that style? (this doesnt sound too likely, personally)

what i meant is, they said that somehow this will all make sense in the end and that all of these apparent canon violations will fit into canon. so im assuming that at the end of the series it will look like TOS

It seems like you need to get on the same page as yourself. In your first post, you're talking about the visual look matching exactly. You get called out on that. Then, you're suddenly saying that you "actually" meant canon violations. Not exactly the same thing at all. :shrug:
 
because they explained the klingon ridges in those enterprise episodes in season 4, and they established that the 60's TOS aesthetic is canon in "relics" (TNG), "trials and tribble-lations (DS9), "in a mirror darkly" (ENT), and "these are the voyages" (ENT)
You're confusing the visual aesthetic with the timeline. Stories can be set in the same timeline yet look different visually. They've got to update things visually and with SFx if they want to retain a modern audience. But, that doesn't preclude using the same timeline.
 
Don't agree. This was kind of disproven in the ENT IaMD episodes. In those episodes the Constitution class ship looked more advanced and futuristic that NX-01.
the SHIP did, yes. Retextured and reskinned, the CG model was something truly to behold.

The bridge set and starship interiors? Not so much. Most of us gave that a pass because of what the show was obviously trying to do timeline wise (hence none of us rolled our eyes when they switched into the period-appropriate Starfleet uniforms; there is literally NO reason for them to wear the TOS style uniforms in this episode but they do it anyway because Fun).

"In a Mirror Darkly" comes so late into the series like it does because it's basically a period piece, with the irony that it's exploring a period in its OWN fictional past. It works as well as it does because everything is SUPPOSED to look dated, because the space warp basically transported the crew into the 1960s version of the Enterprise.
 
Here's an incomplete render I stumbled upon ages ago but it was titled Pike Bridge and with some either Disco color scheming or TOS color scheming it would really shine as a modern take on the old bridge.
M6zVtCr.jpg
reminds me a bit of this early bridge design from star trek 2009:
3s8HKRm.jpg

which was discarded because the producers believed it was too slavish to the original design.
 
reminds me a bit of this early bridge design from star trek 2009:
3s8HKRm.jpg

which was discarded because the producers believed it was too slavish to the original design.
All great designs that easily could be a reimagined TOS/Pilot bridge in my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pst

To help create enough building blocks for people to suspend their disbelief that this show is in the same universe as "TOS." That of course depends if they care about it really connecting to the those shows in a in-universe way as oposed to connecting simply because they like some of the old concepts and want to try to be spiritually connected to them, which is something different and more along of really being a reboot. Which is not to be confused with a remake were you toss almost everything out and really try something radically different.

Jason
 
I was talking about showing an actual Constitution. The Discovery itself doesn't need any of those changes.

I agree for the most part. I just think "Discovery" has to change slighlty. As the tech evolves in the universe it makes sense to me already established ships might not get the full overhaul but you would see some changes. Yet from a creative level it also has to also look good and not just be done to look more like "TOS." Some seem to think it's impossible to find that mix, which I don't understand because the modern Star Wars movies have done it, but I think it can be done. It's all about using one's imagination instead of just giving up and taking the easy way of just doing the sleek style that any sci-fi show based on a spaceship could do.

Jason
 
nuBSG got to "Earth" and it was a nuked out planet where cylons and humans killed each other so they find a new Earth. That other Earth could have been the Earth we live on now, thousands of years in the future or the planet nuBSG goes to could be our Earth thousands of years ago.

In nuBSG's finale, that's exactly what happens.

The original Earth - from "Revelations" - is not our Earth. It's more like nuBSG's version of "Terra" from BSG-TOS (the home of the Eastern Alliance).

In the series finale ("Daybreak") they DO find our Earth, but it's 150,000 years in the past.
 
To help create enough building blocks for people to suspend their disbelief that this show is in the same universe as "TOS."
Already there. The 'wild west' approach to the final frontier, Lorca in the mold of many TOS era captains, lots of nods and references to the era (one might say too many), and the more realistic, contemporary crew. I have no trouble feeling this is in the TOS bubble myself. I don't need beehive hairdos and angular plywood consoles to sell that.
 
Already there. The 'wild west' approach to the final frontier, Lorca in the mold of many TOS era captains, lots of nods and references to the era (one might say too many), and the more realistic, contemporary crew. I have no trouble feeling this is in the TOS bubble myself. I don't need beehive hairdos and angular plywood consoles to sell that.

For me I think I need the tech touches only because I feel 10 years is just two close to "TOS." If they had bumped this show back even a extra 10 years it would be easier to buy. It doesn't have that "TOS" ability of being so far removed from the other shows that helped make me feel like it might be connected to the Berman years not to mention the various cameo's and guest spots from TOS actors, playing their old characters we saw and the few love letter moments like "Relics" and "Trials and Tribbluations." I do think that if you remove "TOS" it fits very well as a prequel to the Berman era. That's why my gut feeling is that this show was created less about connecting to "TOS" but appealing more to fans who started off being fans of the Berman shows. Which is me in that I became a fan first with "TNG" and then soon got into "TOS" and "DS9" and now I love all the shows and movies, even the ones that I admit are flawed like "Voyager" and especially "Enterprise." I also love this show but it does feel right now to me more like a reboot which is fine with me because I think the Kelvin Universe was also a reboot even though offically it's just a alternate universe and I enjoyed them.

Jason
 
hence none of us rolled our eyes when they switched into the period-appropriate Starfleet uniforms; there is literally NO reason for them to wear the TOS style uniforms in this episode but they do it anyway because Fun
Actually, only certain characters wore TOS uniforms and there was a reason for it. They were the ones who were wearing EV suits when the Mirror NX-01 was destroyed. Since they didn't need the EV suits anymore, and they had no uniforms with them, they put on the Defiant crew's uniforms since they won't be needing them.
 
No, the current producers along with CBS do not have to come up with some convoluted aesthetic to shoehorn a 2017 production into a late 60's era budget with limited special effects ability (compared to today of course). There would be no other reason to do so other than to placate the neurosis of a relative few Star Trek fans.

That's not what he said. I agree that it should absolutely not look like TOS, but throwing in the occasional visual similarity to TOS would be a good thing. DIS has done this a few times, take the look of Mudd's wife.

In a broader response to this thread, I know that it isn't so much the case on TrekBBS, but a large portion of fans do care about some level of maintaining continuity and don't want it to be completely ignored simply because it isn't relevant to the story at hand.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top