I wonder if anyone's told Harlan...4 "City on the Edge of Forever" sequels or expansions, 4 non-"City" Guardian stories,
I wonder if anyone's told Harlan...4 "City on the Edge of Forever" sequels or expansions, 4 non-"City" Guardian stories,
You think if someone had, it would still be a secret?I wonder if anyone's told Harlan...4 "City on the Edge of Forever" sequels or expansions, 4 non-"City" Guardian stories,
In 10 SNW volumes, there were 9 tribble stories. The only category more numerous in SNW is Borg stories, of which there were 11. There were also 8 Q stories, 5 stories featuring crossovers among 3 or more series, 5 stories about characters reacting to Kirk's death (either one), 4 "City on the Edge of Forever" sequels or expansions, 4 non-"City" Guardian stories, 4 Barclay stories, 4 Gary Seven stories, 3 stories about Kirk's after-death experiences, 3 Kobayashi Maru stories (2 with Nog, even though a first-year non-command-track cadet shouldn't be taking the KM at all), 3 Iotia stories, 3 Captain Proton stories, and 3 Benny Russell stories (though there's an overlap of 1 story in those last two categories). And a Turquoise Reindeer in a pear tree.
I wonder how many Data-resurrection stories we would've seen if the series had continued.
I hear what you're saying, and I wouldn't necessarily describe you as a "vocal" SNW opponent as a result, but your description of SNW 9 acts as an implicit negative review of the other volumes: "Well, I can't say that the other ones are bad, but I disliked this one so much that I haven't bought or read most of the others."It's just that those outstanding stories were in the minority in the SNW volumes I have read before SNW 9 (I, VII, 8) and with SNW 9 having none whatsoever in my opinion that kind of killed the interest I had in the SNW anthologies. I guess the problem is that my taste in short stories seems to differ from D.W. Smith's for the most part and I have lost faith in his ability to choose stories that are able to "blow me away".I'm sorry you felt that way about SNW 9, since (as I mentioned in my earlier post) I don't share your opinion...Thanks to the overall mediocrity of SNW 9 I haven't bothered to actually write a review of it or pick up the 10th volume. Every of the preceding volumes had at least one or two stories that were standing out positively from the mass, but SNW 9 was just one big pool of mediocrity. Granted, that also means there were less stinkers than in some of the other volumes, but it just wasn't a very satisfying read in my opinion.
Considering these are short-story anthologies, you also shouldn't let your feelings about one keep you from reading any others, since (as you suggested) there are bound to be stories which stand out for you elsewhere.
But FWIW I have those SNW volumes that are still in print saved for future purchase in my Amazon shopping cart, but at the moment other books tend to take priority.
...3 Captain Proton stories, and 3 Benny Russell stories (though there's an overlap of 1 story in those last two categories).
And a Turquoise Reindeer in a pear tree.
...3 Captain Proton stories, and 3 Benny Russell stories (though there's an overlap of 1 story in those last two categories).
Really?Now, I'm curious, which story in which volume?
I hear what you're saying, and I wouldn't necessarily describe you as a "vocal" SNW opponent as a result, but your description of SNW 9 acts as an implicit negative review of the other volumes: "Well, I can't say that the other ones are bad, but I disliked this one so much that I haven't bought or read most of the others."
For someone who comes to a board like this asking for an opinion, and who doesn't have access to a full-on review from you (unlike The Sky's the Limit, two of whose stories you reviewed before the book even came out), this has the same effect as an actual negative review of the book(s) in question.
FWIW I would really like to get hold of some of the earlier volumes, especially SNW II & SNW III with Dayton's stories....
FWIW I would really like to get hold of some of the earlier volumes, especially SNW II & SNW III with Dayton's stories....
Eh. Those suck ass.
Oh, I'm not saying that a negative review(er) would keep me from enjoying the SNW volumes on a personal level...Eh, no sense letting one negative reviewer ruin your enjoyment of the volumes or the series....but seeing that even two of the people who define hardcore TrekLit fandom haven't read the last volumes in the SNW series, I begin to understand why it happened.![]()
I totally agree, and I'm proud to be in SNW 10 with you.The big draw of SNW for me as a reader and as a writer was that I could get a healthy dose of Star Trek stories (18-21 stories in each volume) that weren't tied to any continuity other than the ones I knew from the shows and movies. I didn't have to read multi-volume series to pick up on the inside jokes or to understand what had happened before.
I did have to figure out what episodes to watch in some cases, but hey, Star Trek research is fun.![]()
Seeing the differing attitudes/amount of attention paid to SNW (versus books like The Sky's the Limit) is enlightening, though.
So it has little to do with the fact that SNW was not written by professional authors, if that is what you got out of this thread.![]()
My impression goes beyond this thread, to my own experiences trying to track down reviews for SNW volumes (not just the one I'm inSince basically only Steve, T'Bonz and I have given feedback, I'm curious what you found so enlightening, since I guess you're at least partly referring to the fact that I wrote a review for The Sky's the Limit when I wrote none for SNW 09.Seeing the differing attitudes/amount of attention paid to SNW (versus books like The Sky's the Limit) is enlightening, though.
By definition, SNW was written by professional authors.So it has little to do with the fact that SNW was not written by professional authors, if that is what you got out of this thread.![]()
So it has little to do with the fact that SNW was not written by professional authors, if that is what you got out of this thread.![]()
Every published SNW author is by definition a professional author since SNW was a professional-level publication.
Yeah, why not play semantics, even when you most likely are well aware that I was referring to the fact that only people were eligible who hadn't sold three professionaly published stories yet and by that weren't eligible for a SFWA membership or an Author's Guild membership for example.
If you consider someone correcting erroneous 'facts' to be an attack on you, you might be posting in the wrong place.![]()
My impression goes beyond this thread, to my own experiences trying to track down reviews for SNW volumes (not just the one I'm in) versus finding reviews for other TrekLit novels/anthologies.
I've always wondered exactly what you said about "Full Circle." Here's the Babel Fish translation: clumsy, of course, but your intent is clear:
"It is to be seen nice that Captain (here admiral) brings John Harriman of people to it good stories over it to write, although it looked in star Trek VII like a perfect idiot. That has to probably not last do with the novel "Serpents among the of ruin", which gave it very many more facets and to here also partly refers. Scooty's "influence" on the TNG part of ST VII to see is nicely, even if he knows me somewhat too fast, what Soran intends."
I started this story before Serpents Among the Ruins came out, but then did a lot of last-second revising for continuity because I loved the novel so much . . .
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.