Nearly every starship in Starfleet has a full Captain in command. The only exception is the Nebula class Prometheus from DS9 and sometimes the Defiant.
Spoilers Shouldn't the Farragut disaster have happened already?
- Thread starter JonnyQuest037
- Start date
Although classed as a destroyer, the Zumwalts are cruisers in all but name, and the navy's surface warfare community has had some ideas about reclassifying them that way and changing their armament / mission. Probably won't happen, though. Modern day Burke's are pretty large and well armed when compared to past destroyers, as well.
That said, the Chinese are also building them big.
That's a pretty sweeping generalization- and also an opinion based off your own perceptions.
To be fair, pretty much every Starfleet ship where we know who the commanding officer is has been a captain.
Can you name another Starfleet ship besides the Prometheus and the Defiant commanded by someone ranked lower than an O6 Captain? Indeed, given how many small ships with crews of less than a hundred commanded by O6 Captains we've seen, it seems more fact than mere perception to me.
That was only a temporary command. I guess I should clarify permanent postings.
The captain of the supply ship that transferred Charlie X to the Enterprise. He wore commander stripes.
But was addressed as "Captain" and is a two striper
Might be a hand me down from WNMHGB, but the stripes look to have the post pilot squiggle.
That was probably an early days costuming error, though I imagine saying so would see me accused of moving the goal posts or something.
Just a judicious reuse of existing assets.
I just want to say ‘The Farragut was not destroyed’.
I just wanted to say it. Now I that I said that I am going to stop saying things.
In this thread.
I just wanted to say it. Now I that I said that I am going to stop saying things.
In this thread.
Similar threads
