Probably would be considering they just been through a war.I think Starfleet has a pretty deep bench. It won't be a ship full of noobs.
Probably would be considering they just been through a war.I think Starfleet has a pretty deep bench. It won't be a ship full of noobs.
Nah, They would transfer officers and crew from other ships to fill most of the vacancies. Folks move up and move on in the military, even after a war.Probably would be considering they just been through a war.
Besides...aside from all the nameless Redshirts, that's what? Maybe 5 Senior officers that need replacing in total?Nah, They would transfer officers and crew from other ships to fill most of the vacancies. Folks move up and move on in the military, even after a war.
I think Starfleet has a pretty deep bench. It won't be a ship full of noobs.
TOS S2 Obsession occurs in 2267 so 2256.Just rewatched Obsession. So, the facts of what was said:
11 years before, so the incident happened 2255, which is 4 years in the past where SNW is at.
Also, was his first deep space assignment, so the incident happened in 2255, maybe a few months, maybe upto a year after Kirk was first assigned to the Farragut. But he was just out of the Academy, he might have been a Lt jg right out of the academy, and he's at the upper end, probably on the cusp of Lt Cmd by the SNW time frame of 2259.
So, to the original question. YES it has happened, but it was years ago. He apparently has been on the Farragut his whole service life.
Transferring ships is a rarity. Look at Spock.So, to the original question. YES it has happened, but it was years ago. He apparently has been on the Farragut his whole service life.
Well, he was captain in the Alt-Future seen in the Season 1 finale.I always wondered given that Kirk is now first officer, I wonder if in the next five-six years we find out that he actually got to Captain the Farragut for a time prior to him getting command of the Enterprise.
Well, he was captain in the Alt-Future seen in the Season 1 finale.
How do we know the Farragut isn't a destroyer-type?It was intentional early in TOS that he captained "a destroyer-type" vessel before the Enterprise. That, obviously, is not part of onscreen conitnuity.
It looked a bit big for that.How do we know the Farragut isn't a destroyer-type?
We've never seen a 'Destroyer' in Star Trek canon before.It looked a bit big for that.
We've never seen a 'Destroyer' in Star Trek canon before.
the saucer is the same size as the Connie's saucer.And as I said, the Farragut looked to be quite large, almost as big as a Connie.
The real world USS Zumwalt is commanded by a Captain.Wouldn’t a destroyer, by definition, be a small vessel? Probably not even a full Captain in command.
And as I said, the Farragut looked to be quite large, almost as big as a Connie.
Small doesn't just include size, but weapons, crew and capability.Wouldn’t a destroyer, by definition, be a small vessel? Probably not even a full Captain in command.
And as I said, the Farragut looked to be quite large, almost as big as a Connie.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.