There. Question answered, @Serveaux . Happy?
It doesn’t answer anything.
There. Question answered, @Serveaux . Happy?
Yep.No, you're just incapable of supporting the ridiculous points that you make. You continually repeat fallacy as fact, then get nasty when others point out the obvious and egregious flaws in your reasoning.
You don't have a leg to stand on in other words. This is not your first rodeo on the BBS. We are all totally used to your MO by now.
No, you're just incapable of supporting the ridiculous points that you make. You continually repeat fallacy as fact, then get nasty when others point out the obvious and egregious flaws in your reasoning.
You don't have a leg to stand on in other words. This is not your first rodeo on the BBS. We are all totally used to your MO by now.
Richard S. Ta said:You literally have no idea what you're talking about.
Ever.
It’s a fact that mid budget movies are between $4M and $75M.
Guess we'll have to see if it makes back its money, won't we?Gareth Edwards' upcoming sci-fi film The Creator apparently has a budget of $85 million and the visuals look far better than the recent crop of $300 million superhero movies. So I think that would be a good budget to aim for with a Star Trek movie.
It’s…
If everyone has it all figured out I trust proposals to Paramount are being submitted?
More if people are so certain in their proposal why not take it to Paramount? Money were the mouth is type thing.I love how users on here think you can just submit scripts to Paramount like it’s a friendly greeting to their buddy. Instead of realizing that Paramount has a process that’s very much business minded.
What did I just say about sticking more closely to the topic?I love how users on here think you can just submit scripts to Paramount like it’s a friendly greeting to their buddy.
Yes. Especially if they have a good script. Gimme a new Star Trek movie!Should Paramount put a mid-budget Star Trek film into theaters?
Yes. Especially if they have a good script. Gimme a new Star Trek movie!
a film featuring 2 versions of Batman
Should Paramount put a mid-budget Star Trek film into theaters? There have been so many super expensive flops in the theatres lately, the Flash, Indiana Jones 5, Fast X, etc. I think the old pre-Kelvin Star Trek films made money by not having a massive budget. I liked Beyond, but I thought it spent too much money on effects that did not contribute to the film's story. Wrath of Khan cost 11 million dollars and was amazing. I miss mid-budget sci films (between say 50 to 100 million dollars), it's all blockbusters, and it's getting old, a smaller budget forces a creative team to actually get creative.
"No-budget Star Trek" essentially describes what most fan films have been.No Budget Star Trek.
Who's With ME?
You could even do a TOS-era movie, they already have half of the cast.If you really wanted a 'mid-budget' Trek movie in the current environment, here's how I'd go about it:
Contract with the SNW cast to shoot a movie in the off season.
Use the SNW sets, costumes, and props.
Have someone write a movie-worthy script.
Film it and have the same FX company that does the TV show do the FX work- keep the look and feel consistent with the show.
Lastly, hype the shit out of it. Marketing! It would get interested newcomers to go back and watch the seasons of the show already produced, put asses in theater seats at a balanced cost-profit ratio, and hopefully convince some new fans to watch the TV show going forward.
Side benefit: you keep it in the same 'verse and nip all the howling about canon and continuity right in the bud.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.