No that just applies to opinions that aren't based on facts or rational thinking.Different opinions = bullshit does seem to be your general philosophy from what I've seen.
OK, good to know it's not just Kirk being his usual self then.Have to agree with Kirk55555 on the Johns Shazam. It was the worst version of Billy I have ever read. That being said while the trailer gave us that same setup I didnt get the “Billy is a complete jerk” feel the comic gave.
So... if saying the word "Shazam" changes Billy to the superhero and also changes him back, and his name is now "Shazam," high jinks will ensue whenever he introduces himself by name without stopping to think first.
As I recall Solomon's "cut the baby in half" solution was to make the two women claiming to be the mother stop and think. In the end the baby's actual mother got the child.Another point - whatever route they're going with the source of Billy's powers, he doesn't seem to have "The Wisdom of Solomon" (unless we're being factual, because "cut the baby in half" is actually pretty dumb) to help him cover the areas of life-experience that a kid doesn't have yet. He's going to need to muddle through on his own/with Freddy's help.
Captain Marvel Jr. (Freddy Freeman) always had that same problem, since his magic word to transform was "Captain Marvel."
I think it was established at one point in the modern continuity that he had to say "Shazam!" with intent in order to change.
No that just applies to opinions that aren't based on facts or rational thinking.
OK, good to know it's not just Kirk being his usual self then.
If they ever make the Black Adam movie with The Rock that they've been teasing, he'll probably be 1000 times more heroic then "Shazam", which would be interesting to see (plus it would have The Rock, who unlike Chuck is a good actor and also not an asshole like Chuck).
Another point - whatever route they're going with the source of Billy's powers, he doesn't seem to have "The Wisdom of Solomon" (unless we're being factual, because "cut the baby in half" is actually pretty dumb) to help him cover the areas of life-experience that a kid doesn't have yet. He's going to need to muddle through on his own/with Freddy's help.
As I recall Solomon's "cut the baby in half" solution was to make the two women claiming to be the mother stop and think. In the end the baby's actual mother got the child.
Sounds like your professor had a specific agenda, and really read it wrong.As for the "facts" about Solomon, what I recall learning in college (though I can't cite a source) was that the story of Solomon was actually ancient political propaganda. Solomon was an illegitimate claimant to the throne of Israel, and the famous "cut the baby in half" story was actually a threat to the reigning monarch -- an allegory to indicate that Solomon (the false mother) was willing to tear Israel (the baby) in half with war, so if the true king (the true mother) really loved his country, he should give it up without a fight. Or rather, the story was spread among the people to make them see things that way and put pressure on the king to step down.
As someone else said...that's a bit of a shocker, but helps us understand kirk55555's hate. I never read that series...I am only familiar with Geoff Johns and his TV work, which I think have been the best stuff out there....but I am certainly willing to accept that he messed up majorly with the Shazam comic.Have to agree with Kirk55555 on the Johns Shazam. It was the worst version of Billy I have ever read. That being said while the trailer gave us that same setup I didnt get the “Billy is a complete jerk” feel the comic gave.
I wonder if the Dr. Sivana scene we glimpsed was originally intended for Black Adam...this whole other Black Adam movie seems like a bad move. Black Adam could have been the DC F.U. type of Loki...now thye are pushing him back (while the Rock ages)
From the look of things, Orm is going to be the DCEU answer to Loki.
To be fair, feuding siblings vying for the throne have been a staple of myth and history for ages. Hi, Osiris and Set, Romulus and Remus, King Richard and Prince John, "Much Ado about Nothing," etc. And we can probably bring in King Arthur and Morgan Le Fay as well. It's an old trope.
So how’s the movie going to handle the whole Shazam/Captain Marvel thing? The film has thrown out the Captain Marvel name and is fully embracing Shazam — though there could be a sly reference in the film to the switch.
“Let’s just say we’re going to have a bit of fun with that in the movie,” director David Sandberg (Lights Out) teases on the name change. “But he’s basically known as Shazam, which makes sense because of the confusion.”
To be fair, feuding siblings vying for the throne have been a staple of myth and history for ages. Hi, Osiris and Set, Romulus and Remus, King Richard and Prince John, "Much Ado about Nothing," etc. And we can probably bring in King Arthur and Morgan Le Fay as well. It's an old trope.
If I was in charge I'd keep calling him Captain Marvel.
People already wonder why Wonder Woman, Batman and Superman don't join the Avengers, so what's a little extra confusion to throw in the mix...![]()
You still could, sure, but trademarking becomes a problem. You couldn’t call your movie or book Captain Marvel. Not an impossible hurdle to overcome, but, why have that hurdle in the first place?
Not to mention not being able to use the hero's name on any merchandise. Honestly, DC has been dealing with this trademark headache for for something like forty years now. Can't really blame them for deciding to just bite the damn bullet and call him "Shazam" already.
The purist in me objects, but the pragmatist gets it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.