I don't think that fits here.
They did it to up the stakes by killing an existing character
Maria was fridged, plain and simple. Like Gamora and Natasha Romanoff on that damn planet. Fuck!
I don't think that fits here.
They did it to up the stakes by killing an existing character
Eh? They're nothing a like.So It is basically AOS without the fun bits.
It got nukedPlus there was no fridge.
Working on Secret Invasion, a captivating show exploring the infiltration of aliens into human society, provided an exceptional opportunity to delve into the intriguing realm of AI, specifically for creating unique character attributes and movements. Utilizing a custom AI tool for this particular element perfectly aligned with the project’s overall theme and the desired aesthetic.
The production process was highly collaborative and iterative, with a dedicated focus on this specific application of an AI toolset. It involved a tremendous effort by talented art directors, animators (proficient in both 2D and 3D), artists, and developers, who employed conventional techniques to craft all the other aspects of the project. However, it is crucial to emphasize that while the AI component provided optimal results, AI is just one tool among the array of toolsets our artists used. No artists’ jobs were replaced by incorporating these new tools; instead, they complemented and assisted our creative teams.
Method Studios’ team of designers skillfully leveraged the power of both existing and custom AI technologies to apply the otherworldly and alien look. The entire process, guided by expert art direction, encompassed the initial storyboard phase, illustration, AI generation, 2D/3D animation and culminated in the final compositing stage.
I was *screaming* at that! Nooooooo!The bastards killed Maria Hill.
Notice though how they didn't mention where they got the dataset for the tool. These things can't generate "art" out of thin air; they need to be trained on *thousands* of existing images in order to produce usable results. So unless they paid a massive team of artists to churn out all of those original images (which would be economically unfeasible), it means their dataset is art skimmed from the web, for which nobody was fairly compensated.Well, I guess that makes it a little better. This time.
But it's a slippery slope.
We don't know that. They may have used royalty free images, or images they sourced themselves.but the end result is still a product based on stolen works
Yeah, but like Reverend noted, they didn't say where the source images are from. If they were legit, wouldn't they have said where?We don't know that. They may have used royalty free images, or images they sourced themselves.
Not if they didn't think it was important.Yeah, but like Reverend noted, they didn't say where the source images are from. If they were legit, wouldn't they have said where?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.