RTD lies if it gets good pr.Tennant is 100% the 14th Doctor, RTD said it, he even posted a video on his instagram of him using a coffee coaster with a picture of Tennant and written on the coaster "The 14th Doctor".
RTD lies if it gets good pr.Tennant is 100% the 14th Doctor, RTD said it, he even posted a video on his instagram of him using a coffee coaster with a picture of Tennant and written on the coaster "The 14th Doctor".
ITS A BRAND NEW DAY…
![]()
Toymaker makes more sense. I was thinking it was the Doctor’s son, finally being introduced.
Not from that as such. There was a Big Finish story that hinted of a son. I don’t remember what it was called though.THAT would’ve been a heck of a throwback for the 60th anniversary!I assume you’re referring to the story idea originally proposed by William Hartnell?
So, with the reveal that NPH is playing the Toymaker in the specials, perhaps The Celestial Toymaker would've been a much better and more apt candidate for a missing episodes animation than, say, The Underwater Menace
Not from that as such. There was a Big Finish story that hinted of a son. I don’t remember what it was called though.
The perfect time for it.The one with the villain in yellowface and the only use of the N-word in the series history? In 2023?
And “the beloved Doctor and companion are reunited for the 60th anniversary, oh wait it’s actually a fake-out and he’s not really the Doctor” would not be good PR.RTD lies if it gets good pr.
Must every family member be explained? It demystifies the character and the show is generally more creative than that. Or should be for sci-fi. For his son to do something as if the writers looked at "Star Trek Insurrection" for inspiration just sounds corny, as if that movie succeeded with that trope anyway (it didn't). Also, about eight hundred episodes or so of Jerry Springer, or most 90s talk shows for that matter, faff about with the same topic of "kids versus their parents" as well.
It's also "small universe syndrome" that the Doctor's involvement led to every other enemy he's had to deal with. Honestly, if that's the plot, and I hope it isn't, it's not being radically different, to say the least.
And “the beloved Doctor and companion are reunited for the 60th anniversary, oh wait it’s actually a fake-out and he’s not really the Doctor” would not be good PR.
Perhaps the Doctor had a son? I would say daughter, but they have already kinda done that episode.No doubt now that I have committed this thought to print I will be proven wrong, but I get the impression that nobody writing for DW outside of Big Finish has any interest in revisiting Susan or how the Doctor came to be a grandparent.
(Next week: RTD announces season-long plot based around Susan and her parents)
Carole Ann Ford is still alive, so they could do an ‘old’ and ‘young’ Susan episode, a bit like the DS9 episode The Visitor. Carol Ann Ford may not be acting anymore though…The 11th Doctor did mention Susan. Only a matter of time until they get to her in the show. When they have exhausted everything else.![]()
She'd be a great pick.I heard a rumor years back that Gillian Anderson was going to play the Rani at some point. I don't know what happened to that.
I have not had chills like that for many years in regards to Doctor Who. I’m kind of disappointed that Ncutie is not in this episode more, but I think that he may be in ‘visions’ that the 14th Doctor is having? I could be wrong….Just saw the trailer. Straight up chills. And that kind of thing doesn’t happen often. Can’t wait!!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.