• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Root of all the ENT bashing/hating?

Jack Bauer said:
About the transporters it should be noted that it was something the studio insisted on. Originally B&B had decided not to have transporters on the show. Paramount insisted it wouldn't be Star Trek without them.
Emphasis mine. I think that's actually a big part of where the criticism comes from too. The studio should have kept their mitts off. At the very least, it would have givcn us a better impression of the kind of work B&B could actualy have done.
 
Brutal Strudel said:
For me, the stories just weren't interesting, nor were the characters (particularly the captain--a fatal flaw for a Trek series). Only after that did the cavalier attitude of Bermaga toward TOS and the Akiraprise and the other minutiae ('coz that's all it was) began to bug me.

Had the stories and characters been there, I would have tolerated a great deal. So I tuned out.

(Please note this post is intended simply to answer the question, not to bash or troll. YMMV, as always.)

Aaargh!!! JUST how many times do I have to tell you people this?! LEAVE ARCHER ALONE!!!!

:brickwall: :scream: :rolleyes:

;)
 
I wonder if any Captain could have satisfied every viewer?

I thought Archer a great first Captain. I think Ent was fine though maybe more research and planning by the producers to counter the critics before it came to that. I also find alot of haters I have met at cons etc have only seen an ep or two.
 
I don't know... how did they manage to make Scott Bakula unlikable? I mean, man, it's Scott Bakula!

Seasons 2 and 3 are the reason. imho.
 
Captain X said:

Caithlin_Dar.jpg

Still better than what T'Pol had to begin with, or the double brows that kept showing up in S3. At least here you can see there was some effort put into it by how her eyeliner is, which follows the regular contour of her brow (for whatever reason). She was also a minor character compared to T'Pol, who was very front and center.

T'Pol had the Moe cut and the ears, so I think she looks more Vulcan than Dar. Though I could livedwith out the Moe cut. That bugged me more than the eyebrows.

Ah, I see what you’re saying now. I guess that just means I'm not as big of a fanboy as others because I remember those other Vulcans. My only real bitch point is over the melding stigma.
The melding stigma was very much unthought of. No one saw that coming. Though it almost makes sense. Vulcan psi powers are almost unknown of by the humans on the 1701, until Spock mentions them. Spock also has a rather negative reaction when Mitchell ger his Psi powers
There're a few visual aids here. ;)

Been there manys time over the last several years. There is no doubt that the NX-01 is based on the Akira, but as I've said I can't get worked up over it. Small potatoes


Yes. Initially they denied everything, but eventually they came out and admitted it in an interview around the end of S1, IIRC.
MUst have missed that. I can't recall them ever calling it a fan fave.


So why not call them cannons and torpedoes (or missiles) instead of making really weak attempts at changing the names a little? Why not do something different since they said they were going to? The irony is that in the first half of Broken Bow they actually had a perfectly good weapon they could've used for the small arms, but then they ruined it and replaced them by the second half with the "phase pistols".
They did call them cannons amd torpedoes: phase cannons and spatial torpedos.

No matter what they called it its still going to wind up fuctioning like a phaser. So why be coy about it.

Which operated exactly the same way as shields, right down to failing by percentages.
Most things fail by percentages. It's a good way to track the level of failure.
Just because something is fictional, or even sci fi for that matter, doesn't mean that it can't take itself seriously enough to distinguish between time periods.

With Trek the differences are mostly window dressing. Or deliberate choices bast on consumer expectation.

That isn't the way Picard made it sound though. From what he said, it sounded like they just kind of beamed down and said "hi" or did something else stupid that resulted in a war, but definitely something they did that upon hindsight they could have done differently.

Thats one possible interpretation. Heck even the writer (and Trek BBS poster) Dennis Baiiley admits he didn't but all that much thought into the speech. He tossed in the Klingon reference because it sounded cool.
They didn't need the Klingons anyway, they had the Orions.

My prequel idea used the Orions as the main villains. ;)

How would they have done any of that in Broken Bow when it was a Klingon that crashed on Earth after being chased by Suliban?

By listening to those annoying Vulcans!!!!!

Fiction. Fluid. Prequel. ;) But really just more reason why they shouldn't have even bothered with Klingons.

Huh? Why is that. The Klingons are out there with spacefaring tech, how could they not run across them?


Not really. If they were really going to do that, they'd have made them more like the early TNG Ferengi instead of like the DS9 Ferengi. Prequel and all. But since DS9 kind of frakked that up too, that's just that much more reason to leave that species in the 24th century.


Not really understanding your point. The characterization is consistant with established Ferengi behaviors. You cant bitch about continuity on the one hand and then dismisses it when they get it right on the other


Because that's what they were in First Contact, and that was where they established these Borg came from.

They are Borg if they act with in established Borg behavior what does it matter which film or episode they're from.? Though weren't these Borg mosty assimilated humans from the research team?

Not many, but that isn't the point. The point is that they could have done more with those established aliens. Just as an example, the Tellarites could have used more attention, and the Orions rally could've been the main baddies if they really thought about it. The Andorians, Vulcans, and Romulans were treated well enough.

Sure they could have. And TNG could have done more the Ferengi. There's probably a species on DS9 that could have been played up more than the Klingons.


The premise said that it would be a prequel, and that it would be different from the other series. We got VOY, seasons 8 & 9 instead before things really got changed up very much.
I'll have to take your word for it. I bailed on VOY after season 2. I like Season 1 on ENT because it was more like TOS. Season 2 was ok. Season 3 they got all arcy and ruined the TOS feel. Season 4 was fan wank but fun.

Would you believe that ENT is actually my second favorite series (mostly due to S3)?
Its my third fave after TOS and DS9.
 
Nerys Myk said:
T'Pol had the Moe cut and the ears, so I think she looks more Vulcan than Dar. Though I could livedwith out the Moe cut. That bugged me more than the eyebrows.
I suppose they could have went with the mullet cut. :p But at least other Vulcans, starting with Spock, have been shown to wear that style pretty consistently. Must be a very popular hair style on Vulcan… Personally I could've even lived with the mullet if they got the eyebrows right.

They did call them cannons amd torpedoes: phase cannons and spatial torpedos.
spatial torpedoes were ok, phase cannons weren't. But what I was actually after was something without adjectives. I mean, they had grapplers; it might've even been cool to do something different with the weapons.

No matter what they called it its still going to wind up fuctioning like a phaser. So why be coy about it.
An arrow and a bullet are both projectiles and function more or less alike, but they're still different. My argument is that if you’re going to make a prequel and claim to be different that you should go ahead and do so.

Most things fail by percentages. It's a good way to track the level of failure.
Not in my experience. An energy field might fail in easily determinable percentages, but materials don't. Hull plating would deform and/or fracture, and only the hull plating directly effected by the weapons' fire, not every hull plate on the ship the way a shield bubble might.

With Trek the differences are mostly window dressing. Or deliberate choices bast on consumer expectation.
I'm more demanding, which is why I point out areas that could be improved. ;)

Thats one possible interpretation. Heck even the writer (and Trek BBS poster) Dennis Baiiley admits he didn't but all that much thought into the speech. He tossed in the Klingon reference because it sounded cool.
But that's still what was on screen, so it's established.

My prequel idea used the Orions as the main villains. ;)
Wow, something we agree on. ;)

By listening to those annoying Vulcans!!!!!
Except that what happened wasn't a disastrous first contact leading to decades of war to begin with, and listening to the Vulcans wouldn't have had anything to do with observing a culture before making contact.

Huh? Why is that. The Klingons are out there with spacefaring tech, how could they not run across them?
Space is big.

Not really understanding your point. The characterization is consistant with established Ferengi behaviors. You cant bitch about continuity on the one hand and then dismisses it when they get it right on the other
I'm saying that since ENT was a prequel, if they were going to have the Ferengi, then they should've played them as the sinister, mysterious, cannibalistic gerbils that we first saw in early TNG instead of the lovably misogynist comedians of DS9, or better yet, they should've left well enough alone and just not had them.

They are Borg if they act with in established Borg behavior what does it matter which film or episode they're from.?
Yes. They were from First Contact, so that's how they should've acted, and more importantly, that's the level of technology they had.

Though weren't these Borg mosty assimilated humans from the research team?
Yes, but they still shared the collective consciousness of the original surviving drones.
 
Captain X said:

An arrow and a bullet are both projectiles and function more or less alike, but they're still different. My argument is that if you’re going to make a prequel and claim to be different that you should go ahead and do so.
But arrows and bullets are used in very different types of projectile weapons. Beam weapons are all very similar no matter if you call them a phase pistol, a laser or a phaser. They all shoot energy beams. The are more akin to flintlocks, six shooters and automatics. All versions of the same basic tech.


Not in my experience. An energy field might fail in easily determinable percentages, but materials don't. Hull plating would deform and/or fracture, and only the hull plating directly effected by the weapons' fire, not every hull plate on the ship the way a shield bubble might.

But this is polarized plating. As the polarization failes their effectiveness decreases until all you have it the metal plate. So it is an energy field.


But that's still what was on screen, so it's established.
But open to interpretation as more "facts" come to light.
Except that what happened wasn't a disastrous first contact leading to decades of war to begin with, and listening to the Vulcans wouldn't have had anything to do with observing a culture before making contact.

Looking back from the vanatage point of 200 years it can be though. The lense of History can refocus simingly small events into large ones.


Space is big.
Not that big. Local space in ENT/TOS is pretty small.



I'm saying that since ENT was a prequel, if they were going to have the Ferengi, then they should've played them as the sinister, mysterious, cannibalistic gerbils that we first saw in early TNG instead of the lovably misogynist comedians of DS9, or better yet, they should've left well enough alone and just not had them.
Why cant both types of Ferengi exist? Are all humans alike? The sinister, mysterious, cannibalistic gerbils might just be the "military" faction while independent operators like Quark and the "Mauraders" are the misogynist comedians

Yes. They were from First Contact, so that's how they should've acted, and more importantly, that's the level of technology they had.
Arent they all the same Borg?
 
Nerys Myk said:
But arrows and bullets are used in very different types of projectile weapons. Beam weapons are all very similar no matter if you call them a phase pistol, a laser or a phaser. They all shoot energy beams. The are more akin to flintlocks, six shooters and automatics. All versions of the same basic tech.
A flintlock is vastly inferior to a modern firearm, but the phase cannons on ENT could do everything that the phasers on TNG could do, at least when the plot called for them to. Initially they weren't very effective, but that was forgotten pretty quickly. The plasma weapons they had initially would've been better for the era as a less advanced precursor to what would eventually become a phaser.

But this is polarized plating. As the polarization failes their effectiveness decreases until all you have it the metal plate. So it is an energy field.
The way they described it on the show, all it did was help to harden the hull. The hull would still be damaged, and not by overall percentages that effect the whole ship.

But open to interpretation as more "facts" come to light.
Unless they don't fit.

Looking back from the vanatage point of 200 years it can be though. The lense of History can refocus simingly small events into large ones.
Not so much as to be completely different from what actually happened.

Not that big. Local space in ENT/TOS is pretty small.
Big enough to avoid the Klingons, especially at the slower speeds of the era.

Why cant both types of Ferengi exist? Are all humans alike? The sinister, mysterious, cannibalistic gerbils might just be the "military" faction while independent operators like Quark and the "Mauraders" are the misogynist comedians
The problem is that the DS9 type would have no qualms about identifying themselves as Ferengi, and thus you wouldn't have the great mystery about them in early TNG, because everyone would already know about them.

Arent they all the same Borg?
Not really. The First Contact Borg differ from the Q Who Borg or the BoBW Borg, from their look to their priorities, how they move, and how they assimilate their hapless victims.
 
Captain X said:
A flintlock is vastly inferior to a modern firearm, but the phase cannons on ENT could do everything that the phasers on TNG could do, at least when the plot called for them to. Initially they weren't very effective, but that was forgotten pretty quickly. The plasma weapons they had initially would've been better for the era as a less advanced precursor to what would eventually become a phaser.

And eventually they would be doing everything TNG Phaser could do.

What exactly did those phasers do that were so special and different than phasers in TOS? They just shoot stuff and people. In TOS they could knockout a city block from orbit. Did they ever do that in TNG?


The way they described it on the show, all it did was help to harden the hull. The hull would still be damaged, and not by overall percentages that effect the whole ship.

And as that hardening decreased by increments....


Unless they don't fit.
They fit well enough. Who you gonna trust the guy who learned it in the history books or the guy who was there? ;)

Not so much as to be completely different from what actually happened.

All we really know is that is was a distater. No other details are provided by Picard. Again Archer was there. ;)

Big enough to avoid the Klingons, especially at the slower speeds of the era.

Yet small enough to encounter The Orions, Andorians and Tellerites and any other TOS aliens that strike your fancy?

The problem is that the DS9 type would have no qualms about identifying themselves as Ferengi, and thus you wouldn't have the great mystery about them in early TNG, because everyone would already know about them.
Maybe. Its a different era. Vulcans are Snobbier. Humans are xenophobes. Though the Romulans are still sneaky and the Klingons are still dumb. Ferengi are well established in the Alpha Quad (more so in the Cardassian sectors) in the 24th Century. In the 22nd they yet to gain a foothold in the proto UFP regions and are operating under a different set of rules.

Not really. The First Contact Borg differ from the Q Who Borg or the BoBW Borg, from their look to their priorities, how they move, and how they assimilate their hapless victims.

And Spock was once a smiling fool who shouted alot. Or was that a different Spock?
 
Nerys Myk said:
And eventually they would be doing everything TNG Phaser could do.
They already pretty much were, that was the problem.

What exactly did those phasers do that were so special and different than phasers in TOS?
They could be fired at warp for the ship-mounted ones, and the hand-held ones had different beam adjustments on them so they could be used as a cutting tool.

They just shoot stuff and people.
So what would the harm have been in keeping the plasma weapons they started out with?

In TOS they could knockout a city block from orbit. Did they ever do that in TNG?
Yeah, they did better actually, because they drilled into a planets crust down to the mantle in order to relieve tectonic pressure on a planetary scale. Insanway also threatened to vaporize the building they were in Starling wouldn't give back that timeship.

And as that hardening decreased by increments....
It's a shield under another name.

They fit well enough. Who you gonna trust the guy who learned it in the history books or the guy who was there? ;)
They don't fit. They just aren't anywhere nearly close enough to account for any kind of factual drift that one might see in recorded history, unless Georbles wrote it.

All we really know is that is was a distater. No other details are provided by Picard. Again Archer was there. ;)
No, we also know that it led to decades of war, and later it led to a controversial policy of spying on aliens to make sure they won't freak if you decide to make first contact with them.

Yet small enough to encounter The Orions, Andorians and Tellerites and any other TOS aliens that strike your fancy?
Yes, because since they were a part of the Federation in TOS, even if they were in the same direction from Earth, then that suggests that they are closer to Earth than Quo'Nos.

Maybe. Its a different era. Vulcans are Snobbier. Humans are xenophobes. Though the Romulans are still sneaky and the Klingons are still dumb. Ferengi are well established in the Alpha Quad (more so in the Cardassian sectors) in the 24th Century.
Not really. They were reclusive and the object of rumor and mystery when they were first introduced in TNG, which means the Ferengi Alliance couldn't have been very large then, and even in DS9 they're basically referred to as a third-rate power.

In the 22nd they yet to gain a foothold in the proto UFP regions and are operating under a different set of rules.
The Ferengi we saw didn't look like they were operating under any kind of rules other than the famed rules of acquisition.

And Spock was once a smiling fool who shouted alot. Or was that a different Spock?
Which has nothing to do with the Borg in Regeneration supposing to be from the destroyed sphere in First Contact.
 
Temis the Vorta said:
The root of the bashing is that for the first two seasons, ENT was truly awful in the same way (and for the same reasons) VOY was awful. And like VOY, this meant that a very promising premise, and some decent actors, were being utterly wasted, which was a frakking crime.

S3 was an improvement simply because they were trying something new, tho not doing it very well. S4 was what ENT should have been from the start.

Sometimes the bashers are right, yknow. ;)

I was thinking of this recently, that if Enterprise didn't give into the pressure to evolve from the TOS bible which kept Voyager running full steam through steaming turd stories, then maybe if Ent hadn't rocked the boat and kept it's head down, it would have survived for another 5 years producing episodic reset button no consequence stories from season 3 through to the contracts end of the actor in season seven?

A couple good episodes out of 26 a year is all I needed, and if Enterprise hand't whacked itself from a fit of failed selfimprovement then they would have been allowed to make a series 6 afterwards which would be just exactly the same as Voyager and TOS and Enterprise, god help us all.

This vacuum of nothingness is intollerable.
 
Captain X said:


They already pretty much were, that was the problem.

I was refering to the plasma cannons not the phase cannons. No matter what they called them, they would funtion as phasers in every way except for the name.


They could be fired at warp for the ship-mounted ones, and the hand-held ones had different beam adjustments on them so they could be used as a cutting tool.

In TOS phasers were fired at Warp since day one. TNG changed that to sound more "scientific". Phasers were also used as cutting tools. See "The Naked Time." Heck in TOS a starship had enough fire power to sterilize an entire planet.

So what would the harm have been in keeping the plasma weapons they started out with?
None at all, but the producers or studio wanted some familiarity in the tech and names as touchstones for viewers with a passing knowledge of Star Trek. Though it sound like you like change for the sake of change.

Yeah, they did better actually, because they drilled into a planets crust down to the mantle in order to relieve tectonic pressure on a planetary scale. Insanway also threatened to vaporize the building they were in Starling wouldn't give back that timeship.
Then the TNG phasers have improved on the TOS ones. Technology marches forward. Now did the ENT phasers equal or go one better than TOS or TNG/DS9/VOY?


It's a shield under another name.
Any protective device be in energy, metal or magic is a "sheild". I think your objection is the percentages which you associate with TNG. So by your way of thinking it can't appear on ENT. Which to me a tortured logic.

They don't fit. They just aren't anywhere nearly close enough to account for any kind of factual drift that one might see in recorded history, unless Georbles wrote it.
I think I've shown how they fit. YMMV.

No, we also know that it led to decades of war, and later it led to a controversial policy of spying on aliens to make sure they won't freak if you decide to make first contact with them.

Did it really? Or was Picard engaging in hyperbole? There was a long protracted Cold War, but other than "Errand of Mercy" did the UFP and the Empire ever engage in all out war? The thing about Picard's statement is it just doesn't fit with what we know about Federation-Klingon history. That history has usually been an analog to US-USSR relations. Small skirmishes, often using proxies, with the occasional saber rattling.

Yes, because since they were a part of the Federation in TOS, even if they were in the same direction from Earth, then that suggests that they are closer to Earth than Quo'Nos.
Thats a bit of tortured logic. So if Qo'NoS was closer the Klingons would join the Federation? Did we even know how long the Andorians and the Tellerites had been UFP members in TOS? They could have joined a year or two before "Journey To Babel"? for all we knew. The Romulans must be closer still since Earth fought them before the UFP was formed.

According to STVI the Klingons and Federation have been on hostile terms since the early 23rd Century. I doubt this hostilty appeared over night in 2223.


Not really. They were reclusive and the object of rumor and mystery when they were first introduced in TNG, which means the Ferengi Alliance couldn't have been very large then, and even in DS9 they're basically referred to as a third-rate power.
They werent all that reclusive or mysterious. Picard knew what their ships looked like. And they knew enough abut them to draw a parallel to "Yankee Traders" and for Picard to threaten Groppler Zorn with Ferengi horror stories. Zorn even mention he's in negotiations with the Ferengi. The biggest mystery was what they looked like. Which nicely parallels the Ferengi not giveing their name in ENT.
The Ferengi we saw didn't look like they were operating under any kind of rules other than the famed rules of acquisition.

They seemed to be operation under the keep things on the downlow rule. (Might even be a Rule of Aquisition) Just like the Ferengi in "The Last Outpost" and "The Battle" did. Seems to be SOP for Ferengi when entering a "new market".


Which has nothing to do with the Borg in Regeneration supposing to be from the destroyed sphere in First Contact.

I don't compartmentalize species and individuals in Star Trek by episode, series or film. To me they become more interesting, complex and real if you factor in everything. So the Spock is both the smiling guy from "The Cage" and Mister cool logic from TOS and The Borg from "First Contact", "Q Who" and "Regeneration" are the same only operating under different circumstances and parameters.
 
I'm a big DS9 fan, and I couldn't tell you which ship design is the Akira, and I never thought that the NX-01 was a ripoff of anything beyond the typical Federation saucer and two nacelle design.

I like ENT, but it is my least favorite ST series because it had too much blandness and mediocrity in its first three seasons. For every standout like "Dead Stop," there were four forgettable episodes like "Canamar."
 
Nerys Myk said:
I was refering to the plasma cannons not the phase cannons. No matter what they called them, they would funtion as phasers in every way except for the name.
Not if they'd treated them the way they should've. Hell, I wouldn't have even had a stun setting on the small arms.


In TOS phasers were fired at Warp since day one.
I seem to remember something about only being able to use photon torpedoes at warp from some technobabble reason, then later they presumably found a way to make using phasers possible because the writers forgot about that restriction.

TNG changed that to sound more "scientific". Phasers were also used as cutting tools. See "The Naked Time." Heck in TOS a starship had enough fire power to sterilize an entire planet.
Was there anything to suggest that ENT's "phase cannons" couldn't do the same?

None at all, but the producers or studio wanted some familiarity in the tech and names as touchstones for viewers with a passing knowledge of Star Trek. Though it sound like you like change for the sake of change.
If the idea was to make the show different from the previous four, you change things, not just rename them.

Then the TNG phasers have improved on the TOS ones. Technology marches forward. Now did the ENT phasers equal or go one better than TOS or TNG/DS9/VOY?
I'd say they equaled those of TNG/DS9/VOY


Any protective device be in energy, metal or magic is a "sheild".
Unless they use armor.

I think your objection is the percentages which you associate with TNG. So by your way of thinking it can't appear on ENT. Which to me a tortured logic.
No, I just think that if you’re going to claim to be different that you should live up to that.

I think I've shown how they fit. YMMV.
No, you stretched it and tried to make it fit, but it still doesn't.

Did it really?
Yes.

Or was Picard engaging in hyperbole?
No. Picard was preachy, but he always had a point that actually had something to do wit hthe matter at hand.

There was a long protracted Cold War, but other than "Errand of Mercy" did the UFP and the Empire ever engage in all out war? The thing about Picard's statement is it just doesn't fit with what we know about Federation-Klingon history.
There is nothing that came before that which suggests otherwise. The Federation and Klingons were already hostile toward each other in TOS. Wouldn't it stand to reason that the Federation and Klingons might have engaged in open war and simply arrived at a stalemate? It doesn't parallel US/Soviet relations exactly unless you think they fought as allies against a common enemy before-hand. So what Picard said, fits, and it came first.

Thats a bit of tortured logic. So if Qo'NoS was closer the Klingons would join the Federation?
Uh, what? No, I'm saying that the other worlds are part of the Federation and the Klingon empire is along the outside of that, therefore those other planets are closer. Unless you think they had to cross the Klingon Empire every time they wanted to go visit their member worlds.

Did we even know how long the Andorians and the Tellerites had been UFP members in TOS? They could have joined a year or two before "Journey To Babel"? for all we knew.
Except that they were founding members along with Alpha Centauri, Vulcan, and Earth.

The Romulans must be closer still since Earth fought them before the UFP was formed.
No, they were just closer than the Klingon Empire, or at least the Romulans had spheres of influence that were closer.


According to STVI the Klingons and Federation have been on hostile terms since the early 23rd Century. I doubt this hostilty appeared over night in 2223.
The hundred years between ENT and TOS is plenty of time for what Picard described to happen in.

They werent all that reclusive or mysterious. Picard knew what their ships looked like. And they knew enough abut them to draw a parallel to "Yankee Traders" and for Picard to threaten Groppler Zorn with Ferengi horror stories. Zorn even mention he's in negotiations with the Ferengi. The biggest mystery was what they looked like.
Exactly, so since they didn't know what they looked like, they were reclusive and mysterious. Knowing what their ships looked like meant that they'd encountered their ships before. Knowing that they were traders and did business could come from any source, including the Orion Syndicate.

Which nicely parallels the Ferengi not giveing their name in ENT.
No it doesn't. Not only did members of the crew see them very up close and personally, but they also knew what their ship looked like, and undoubtedly there'd also be sensor records, security footage, etc. Simply failing to mention their name wouldn't keep later crews from putting 2 and 2 together well before the 2360s.

They seemed to be operation under the keep things on the downlow rule. (Might even be a Rule of Aquisition) Just like the Ferengi in "The Last Outpost" and "The Battle" did. Seems to be SOP for Ferengi when entering a "new market".
They were simple pirates, and they got caught red-handed. There was no excuse beyond the real-life cop-out of not mentioning their name in a pathetic attempt to maintain canon for people like me while still needlessly including a 24th century alien into a 22nd century show.


I don't compartmentalize species and individuals in Star Trek by episode, series or film.
I do. I factor in when things are supposed to take place, because time is linear. The Borg were supposed to be from First Contact, so the 2370s. They introduced themselves to their victims and let them know exactly what they were going to do to them. The Borg in Regeneration did the second part, but conveniently forgot that first part for the same reason as the Ferengi not mentioning their name and supposedly being too scared to have anything to do with Earth, Vulcan, Andorian, Tellarite, or any other future UFP member planet ships because Archer threatened a few pirates.

Smiley said:
I'm a big DS9 fan, and I couldn't tell you which ship design is the Akira
You really should by now if you're so sure it isn't a rip-off even though Berman and the guy who actually designed the NX-01 admitted as much. But here's a couple pictures just for your information then if you really don't know what it looks like.

akiradeath.jpg


akirarearstyl_sm.jpg


and I never thought that the NX-01 was a ripoff of anything beyond the typical Federation saucer and two nacelle design.
No offense, but have you tried looking at them?

Akira-NX.jpg


akira-vs-akiraprise.jpg


enterpriselarge-comments.jpg
 
Captain X said:
[Not if they'd treated them the way they should've. Hell, I wouldn't have even had a stun setting on the small arms.

They set the rules so there is no "should've"



I seem to remember something about only being able to use photon torpedoes at warp from some technobabble reason, then later they presumably found a way to make using phasers possible because the writers forgot about that restriction.
Not in TOS They fire phasers and photons at warp, from orbit and at impulse.


Was there anything to suggest that ENT's "phase cannons" couldn't do the same?
You tell me. You're the one claiming they can do everything a TOS or TNG phaser could do. You must have an example of them doing so. As far as I recall all the did was shoot other ships.



If the idea was to make the show different from the previous four, you change things, not just rename them.
But if they follow the same function is there really a change. You can call it a "plasma cannon" but its really just another energy weapon. Laser, phaser, plasma,\ it really all the same. The alternative would have been a non energy weapon. But thats not Star Trek.

I'd say they equaled those of TNG/DS9/VOY
But not TOS??? Again example of tne phase weapons doing something that a TOS phaser cant do but a TNG/DS9/VOY phaser can.

Unless they use armor.
Armor is sheilding. And in ENT they used a combination of metal armor (sheilding) enhanced by polarization.

No, I just think that if you’re going to claim to be different that you should live up to that
Hype. Don't believe it. There was no way the studio or the network was going to allow a Trek that was nothing like Star Trek to be made.



No, you stretched it and tried to make it fit, but it still doesn't.
As I said. YMMV. I'm from the generation of fans that takes making it fit as a challenge.



No. Picard was preachy, but he always had a point that actually had something to do wit hthe matter at hand.
Seems like he made the basic look before you leap allegory. Fits what he said and what happened on ENT.


There is nothing that came before that which suggests otherwise. The Federation and Klingons were already hostile toward each other in TOS. Wouldn't it stand to reason that the Federation and Klingons might have engaged in open war and simply arrived at a stalemate? It doesn't parallel US/Soviet relations exactly unless you think they fought as allies against a common enemy before-hand. So what Picard said, fits, and it came first.

You really need to watch TOS and understand the time period in which it was made. Having lived through the 1960s I can assure you that the Klingons were Soviet stand ins during TOS. Sonmething that was carried through to STVI. (Gorkon. Gorbachev.) No it doesn't parallel exactly nor dies it have to, but its pretty obvious what the writes of TOS intended. Though the idea of the Klingons being one of the Earth's allies in the Romulan war is interesting.

Sure its possible that the Klingons and the UFP fought a decades long war, but there nothing to support it out side of Picards statement.



Uh, what? No, I'm saying that the other worlds are part of the Federation and the Klingon empire is along the outside of that, therefore those other planets are closer. Unless you think they had to cross the Klingon Empire every time they wanted to go visit their member worlds.

Thats two dimensional thinking. Space is not only big but three dimensional and expands in all directions. Terrestrial ideas of borders and boundries don't always apply. The idea that every planet close to Earth joined the UFP so the Klingon has to futher away because it not part of the UFP makes little sense. Klingon and UFP areas of infuence can be all over the Galaxy. Some "side by side". Others "above and below." There can be a big chunk of Klingon space bisecting parts of the UFP.

Except that they were founding members along with Alpha Centauri, Vulcan, and Earth.
Wasnt that just fan conjecture until ENT? Though Alpha Centauri was given the boot IIRC.

No, they were just closer than the Klingon Empire, or at least the Romulans had spheres of influence that were closer.
Accorrding to the map in "Balance of Terror" Romulus and Remus (Rom II) are pretty darn close to the Neutral Zone. They're the only planets given names. That the Romulans are closer than the Klingons is pure conjecture.

The hundred years between ENT and TOS is plenty of time for what Picard described to happen in.
No mention of it though.

Exactly, so since they didn't know what they looked like, they were reclusive and mysterious. Knowing what their ships looked like meant that they'd encountered their ships before. Knowing that they were traders and did business could come from any source, including the Orion Syndicate.
So it would be possible for a group of Ferengi to met humans in the 22nd Century.

No it doesn't. Not only did members of the crew see them very up close and personally, but they also knew what their ship looked like, and undoubtedly there'd also be sensor records, security footage, etc. Simply failing to mention their name wouldn't keep later crews from putting 2 and 2 together well before the 2360s.

Your looking at from the perspective a Star Trek viewer who knows what a Ferengi looks like and knows what they are called. To the UFP and Starfleet they are two seperate unknown aliens. One are called Ferengi and the others looked like hairless, snaggle toothed rats. The snaggle tooth rats were last heard of 200 years ago. The Ferengi seem to have appear within the 24th Century. So until the Fenengi appeared on the 1707D's view screen no one knew the snaggled toothed rats were the Ferengi.


They were simple pirates, and they got caught red-handed. There was no excuse beyond the real-life cop-out of not mentioning their name in a pathetic attempt to maintain canon for people like me while still needlessly including a 24th century alien into a 22nd century show.

There you go compartmentalizing again: "24th Century alien" and "22nd Century show".

Crooks give out false information to the authhorities all the time. Sometime they even use false names.

I do. I factor in when things are supposed to take place, because time is linear. The Borg were supposed to be from First Contact, so the 2370s. They introduced themselves to their victims and let them know exactly what they were going to do to them. The Borg in Regeneration did the second part, but conveniently forgot that first part for the same reason as the Ferengi not mentioning their name and supposedly being too scared to have anything to do with Earth, Vulcan, Andorian, Tellarite, or any other future UFP member planet ships because Archer threatened a few pirates.

The Borg are the Borg. Sometimes they give the we are the Borg speech and sometimes they dont. In "Regenration" and "Q Who" they chose not to.

These are Ferengi. The probably lied and exaggerated what happened to them. So the Nagus of that time decide that sector of space wasn't worth the hassle. Or they just contiuned operating on the downlow and avoided Humans and Vulcans.
 
Captain X, I can see the similarities between ships in a side-by-side comparison. However, watching the DS9 DVDs at normal speed and no pausing, no ship ever jumped out at me as looking like the NX-01.
 
Guy Gardener said:
A couple good episodes out of 26 a year is all I needed, and if Enterprise hand't whacked itself from a fit of failed selfimprovement then they would have been allowed to make a series 6 afterwards which would be just exactly the same as Voyager and TOS and Enterprise, god help us all.
It may have been mentioned somewhere in between the TL;DR posts, but I'll repeat it: Les Moonves wanted this show gone. Period. (I think I remember him going on the record publically to say in season three that he would have cancelled Enterprise at the end of season three, if he'd been in charge of UPN at the time.) No amount of good writing or ratings other than complete domination of that timeslot could have saved ENT.

And even aside from that--a few good episodes out of 26? :wtf: I'm hoping there's some sarcasm in there that went over my head, because that whole mentality of Trek skating by on a few good episodes is exactly why no one's put any effort into this franchise since mid-Voyager.
 
Nerys Myk said:
They set the rules so there is no "should've"
The entire point of this thread is to discuss the roots of why some people don't like ENT. In other words, what they should've done but didn't.

You tell me. You're the one claiming they can do everything a TOS or TNG phaser could do. You must have an example of them doing so. As far as I recall all the did was shoot other ships.
The only real example is the devastation done to the moon or asteroid in Fight or Flight that I can think of off hand. Otherwise they had no reason to ever fire on a planet.

But if they follow the same function is there really a change. You can call it a "plasma cannon" but its really just another energy weapon. Laser, phaser, plasma,\ it really all the same. The alternative would have been a non energy weapon. But thats not Star Trek.
Why not? By your argument, muzzle loading cannons would somehow equate to phasers because they have the same function.

But not TOS???
Presumably 24th century phasers are more powerful than 23rd century versions, so by saying ENT's were as powerful as that makes comparing them to TOS phasers irrelevant.

Armor is sheilding. And in ENT they used a combination of metal armor (sheilding) enhanced by polarization.
Armor is physical, the shields (or polarization in this case) are energy.

Hype. Don't believe it. There was no way the studio or the network was going to allow a Trek that was nothing like Star Trek to be made.
That is why they failed.

As I said. YMMV. I'm from the generation of fans that takes making it fit as a challenge.
So am I, but you can't make a square peg fit into a round hole. ;)

Seems like he made the basic look before you leap allegory. Fits what he said and what happened on ENT.
Picard used a specific example of what could go wrong if he did what that alien he was talking to wanted. It does not fit with what happened in ENT because what happened in ENT was neither disastrous, nor was it decades of war.
You really need to watch TOS and understand the time period in which it was made. Having lived through the 1960s I can assure you that the Klingons were Soviet stand ins during TOS.
I know that, and I never said they weren't. What I said was that they weren't exact allegories.

Though the idea of the Klingons being one of the Earth's allies in the Romulan war is interesting.
Except for that alliance they have with the Rommies in TOS.

Sure its possible that the Klingons and the UFP fought a decades long war, but there nothing to support it out side of Picards statement.
Which is enough until someone comes along and actually shows it.

Thats two dimensional thinking. Space is not only big but three dimensional and expands in all directions. Terrestrial ideas of borders and boundries don't always apply. The idea that every planet close to Earth joined the UFP so the Klingon has to futher away because it not part of the UFP makes little sense.
Except that every map we've ever seen on screen presents things in a 2D manner.

Wasnt that just fan conjecture until ENT? Though Alpha Centauri was given the boot IIRC.
It was behind the scenes conjecture by the people who made it. I consider it canon because it was in Picard's book in Generations.

Accorrding to the map in "Balance of Terror" Romulus and Remus (Rom II) are pretty darn close to the Neutral Zone. They're the only planets given names. That the Romulans are closer than the Klingons is pure conjecture.
Which just happens to fit the established facts.

So it would be possible for a group of Ferengi to met humans in the 22nd Century.
Not in person.

Your looking at from the perspective a Star Trek viewer who knows what a Ferengi looks like and knows what they are called. To the UFP and Starfleet they are two seperate unknown aliens. One are called Ferengi and the others looked like hairless, snaggle toothed rats. The snaggle tooth rats were last heard of 200 years ago. The Ferengi seem to have appear within the 24th Century. So until the Fenengi appeared on the 1707D's view screen no one knew the snaggled toothed rats were the Ferengi.
I'm looking at it from the perspective of everything the Ferengi said being a matter of record and being able to compare it to what's been said about them from other sources, including power signatures, hull compositions, and ship configuration.

There you go compartmentalizing again: "24th Century alien" and "22nd Century show".
Exactly the same way I'd compartmentalize the 19th century American from the 21st century American, or anyone else for that matter.

Crooks give out false information to the authhorities all the time. Sometime they even use false names.
They didn't even do that.

The Borg are the Borg. Sometimes they give the we are the Borg speech and sometimes they dont. In "Regenration" and "Q Who" they chose not to.
In First Contact and in every encounter in VOY, they did. That was the 2370s, and that was when these Borg were supposed to have been from.

These are Ferengi. The probably lied and exaggerated what happened to them. So the Nagus of that time decide that sector of space wasn't worth the hassle. Or they just contiuned operating on the downlow and avoided Humans and Vulcans.
They were pirates, why would the Nagus even care? And even if he did, why would anything about these few pirates being outwitted due to their own stupidity keep him from sending warships if he thought there was profit in it?

Smiley said:
Captain X, I can see the similarities between ships in a side-by-side comparison. However, watching the DS9 DVDs at normal speed and no pausing, no ship ever jumped out at me as looking like the NX-01.
Did for me. I could tell you pretty much every class of ship in a given shot for the show. As soon as I saw the patch in TV Guide, I instantly thought of the Akira class.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top