Some Pokemon Cards can have beautiful art
![]()
You don't think the concept of the Belters is interesting? Working the Belt they live in a lower gravity environment, resulting in different physical traits. Taller, thinner, weaker bones. They don't live as long because of it. It's juxtaposed against the healthier citizens of Mars and Earth who have longer lifespans. The Belter women have difficulty giving birth because of weaker abdominal muscles from the gravity as well.Really? The Expanse's version of poverty seemed very contemporary to me. Both in Amos' Baltimore and the Belt. The only poverty Raffi seems to be suffering from is the emotional and mental kind that comes from losing one's sense of purpose.
Well the Belters live in space and Raffi lives on Earth. The Belt's environment contributes to their physiology, it's not the result of poverty. Language also evolves. They communicate differently because they're in space suits. Their spoken language is a mixture of Earth languages. The Martians also have physiological difference based on environment. The folks on Earth are a better parallel Raffi. And their Basic sucks compared to the Federation.You don't think the concept of the Belters is interesting? Working the Belt they live in a lower gravity environment, resulting in different physical traits. Taller, thinner, weaker bones. They don't live as long because of it. It's juxtaposed against the healthier citizens of Mars and Earth who have longer lifespans. The Belter women have difficulty giving birth because of weaker abdominal muscles from the gravity as well.
The Belters also speak differently.
It's an interesting setup. And obviously some thought and imagination were put into it.
And it's still grounded in our reality as well. You can find many analogues in it, as the Belters are producing for the richer societies.
I think it's pretty clear Raffi is meant to be lower class, but there's nothing interesting or creative about it.
Well she isn't.I think it's pretty clear Raffi is meant to be lower class
Based on what? What is "Lower class" in the 24th Century? People without a vineyard?I think it's pretty clear Raffi is meant to be lower class, but there's nothing interesting or creative about it.
And we see in PIC from Picard's vault at the Starfleet Archive that the artifact survived and is now kept on protected display. So he wasn't just dismissing the treasured artifact and throwing it for the sake of throwing it, it survived and was eventually sent to Earth.
I agree with those who say that Raffi was living as a hermit, in a 24th century version of a mobile home, out in the middle of nowhere, because she chose to do so. At the time, she evidently valued isolation more than she valued comfort, for reasons others have stated more eloquently.
Sounds like TNG people to a tee.
Photography is a form of art.
In what art?I'm an artist.
NO.
Yes, because he had just lost his brother, nephew and command. Some things are more important than art, even to art lovers.
hmmmm..... who out of everyone here could possibly be doing that....do you just argue for the sale of arguing?
I've seen what looks like a kid's scribbles in art museums. Or a piece of empty white canvas. Ever heard of "monochrome bleu"? Or the "fat corner"?A baseball card! That's art for you?
....
I've seen what looks like a kid's scribbles in art museums. Or a piece of empty white canvas. Ever heard of "monochrome bleu"? Or the "fat corner"?
That's not what Bill is saying at all. Consider what kind of place Picard as it emotionally in that scene. In the span of the last few days, he's lost his brother, nephew, childhood home, current home and his job. Losing just one of these can set some people off in unexpected and out of character ways, but for a guy who's just lost all of that? Of course he's not going to give much of a damn about some inanimate object and just toss it aside like trash regardless of what it actually is and is worth.So you're saying that Picard can only care about one thing at a time?
That's not what Bill is saying at all. Consider what kind of place Picard as it emotionally in that scene. In the span of the last few days, he's lost his brother, nephew, childhood home, current home and his job. Losing just one of these can set some people off in unexpected and out of character ways, but for a guy who's just lost all of that? Of course he's not going to give much of a damn about some inanimate object and just toss it aside like trash regardless of what it actually is and is worth.
Emotions are complex.That's not how it looks at all. What we see is Picard rummaging through the debris of his quarters to find a scrapbook that he couldn't doubt reconstruct anytime with computer records while exchanging two-bit metaphysical views with Riker. Saying that someone once said to him (that time was a predator) while that happened a couple of hours before. Does he seem affected by the destruction of enterprise? Not in the least.
Art speaks to the individual not billions.I'll paraphrase Picasso by responding: "Chinese may seem like nonsensical scribblings to you but there are more than a billion Chinese people to whom it means something."
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.