• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Pocket's 2010 Schedule Announced on TrekMovie.com

^As I've said before, don't assume that any single year's schedule represents a permanent policy. It was decided that it made sense to break 2010 into three "phases," but the factors involved in the scheduling decisions for 2011 may be different.

However, assuming the next movie comes out in 2011, then there'd probably be a fair number of books tying into it, so I doubt we'd have room for four whole books about DS9 in the same year. Indeed, my guess would be that the most likely year to expect any major DS9 "event" would be 2013, its 20th anniversary. Though hopefully it will have a fairly regular presence before then.

I did think about that, there could certainly be a big lot of new movie books out in 2011, on the other hand the editors might want to avoid setting too much in that universe due to the fact that you don't want books out that completely contradict the new film, right on top of said film. Could go either way.

And we've had a block of three DS9 books before, and next year brings us a whole bunch of TOS books, for which there's room in the schedule despite the large number of NuTrek books also out that year And since a lot of those TOS books focus on characters who weren't even in the ST09, it doesn't seem like that choice was made to 'cash in' on the ST09 success, but rather because we haven't had many TOS books for ages.

Not saying it will happen, just again, we don't really know. So it makes no sense to consider some series abandoned.
 
I did think about that, there could certainly be a big lot of new movie books out in 2011, on the other hand the editors might want to avoid setting too much in that universe due to the fact that you don't want books out that completely contradict the new film, right on top of said film. Could go either way.

Maybe that would be a good time to do a Kelvin novel, say. Something that's in the film's universe but avoids any area that might conflict with the film. Just speculating, though. It's not my decision.


Not saying it will happen, just again, we don't really know. So it makes no sense to consider some series abandoned.

I thought we were past the "abandoned" stuff and on to the topic of when and how we might see the "jump" in the DS9 chronology filled in.
 
Here's somethin':

Hey--what are the odds that a tale's gonna come out soon on how George Kirk's years on the Kelvin were SUPPOSED to go (i.e. in the "Prime" Universe)?
 
I long for the days when each series was on a regular rotation and it was only two months, at most, that you had to wait for the next book of your favorite flavor of Trek. This one book every year, punctuated by the occasional three book special series, is for the birds.

Good reason to become a completist, I reckon.


But I don't want to read the other Treks. I just want to read my favorite brand of Trek. TNG all the way, baby!



DES
"There's coffee in that nebula!"
(with our luck it would be decaf)
 
But I don't want to read the other Treks. I just want to read my favorite brand of Trek. TNG all the way, baby!

How many characters does TNG have to lose before it stops being TNG? No Yar, no Wesley, no O'Brien, no Data, no Troi, no Riker... Seems to me that "Riker & Troi on Titan" novels would count as TNG, so that adds some titles to your pile.
 
Anyone who loves TNG so much, should definetly be reading Titan. It's like TNG Jr. . Riker, Troi, and Vale plus other former enterprisers like Alyssa Ogawa and Ranul Keru :techman:
 
But I don't want to read the other Treks. I just want to read my favorite brand of Trek. TNG all the way, baby!


See, I was like that with DS9, but remember the series are being written by much the same set of authors, giving much the same sort of stories. You'd probably enjoy them a lot.
 
I have been waiting for this conflict from the moment ENT was announced.

This conflict deserves a whole series of books... it is an essential historic event in TREK's history.

Sure, but maybe you won't like it. Maybe no one will like it? And yet we're already complaining and stressing out that there won't be a volume in 2010, even though the 2009 volume hasn't even come out yet.
But liking it or not liking it did not have much of an effect an Enterprise Book being released every year for the past few years so far. So we don't even need to wait and see. Obviously people are liking what's come so far since we actually got to the stage where the Romulan War kicked off. There was a lot of talk of getting closer to where we would see it being a true prequel to TOS.
 
^As I recall, one of TPTB claimed that the Romulan War books would give clues as to why the "look" of TOS is so apparently "primitive" in comparison to ENT.

I think it was Margaret Clark--but I'm not certain....
 
I myself am excited for "Unspoken Truth" by Margaret Wander Bonanno. I know very little about the author though.
 
So we don't even need to wait and see. Obviously people are liking what's come so far since we actually got to the stage where the Romulan War kicked off.

And you're getting a much thicker book than normal. So just read half of it, and save half for next year! :devil:
 
Multi-volume, eh? In that case, we might be talkin' Atlas Shrugged length....

Or even (shudder) War And Peace length! :eek:

Nah...not that bad. But still, I tend to get excited by the sight of a SUPER-novel. It's usually a sure sign that says, "Epic Complexity Awaits...."

Like Atlas Shrugged...and War And Peace. ;)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top