• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Paul Wesley's incarnation of James T. Kirk

You're in a bit of a slump about fandom generally these days I think. Focus on your own enjoyment and don't let folks get you down.
Because I see the same trends being repeated as I saw with Abrams Trek. Insults towards actors and writers, fixated on tiny details rather than a story as a whole, timing debates and the like.

It's not fun. It's frustrating because we'll any enjoyment is buried by a post mortem analysis that seeks to draw ever detail out to condem modern episodes as not Trek.

Probably take a break from this season. Just not fun any more.
 
A time travel episode where the course of the future is at stake isn't "Trek trappings?" In what universe? :lol:
They've done "one man shows" before. "Captain's Holiday" comes to mind.

Well by trappings I mean lots of aliens, space ships, warping etc.

And as I mentioned in the SNW thread I felt when there was 26 episodes a season these dalliances felt more acceptable. I didn't dislike the SNW episode, and Chong is all sorts of wonderful, but it's just last week was a court scene (an excellent one at that, the most Trek thing in years), this week was modern Trek... they're big chunks of a small season. I just don't want to lose the magic of exploration.
 
Oh you again. You're quite exhausting.

You know full well the intention of my message. Stop explaining to me. I've watched Star Trek for almost 40 years and for decades wrote about it professionally. Star Trek is whatever I fucking want it to be.
 
Oh you again. You're quite exhausting.

You know full well the intention of my message. Stop explaining to me. I've watched Star Trek for almost 40 years and for decades wrote about it professionally. Star Trek is whatever I fucking want it to be.
That's supposed to impress me? An appeal to authority? Nope. You're just a guy posting on a BBS like the rest of us. I've watched Trek since 1966 and have discussed almost since then. All that means is I'm old :lol:
My interpretation of your intention is just that. If I'm wrong so be it. Could be me or it could be you're not clear in what you say and how you say it,
 
No, it's meant to say I can have an opinion and you will not quell me.

Respect others. You're taking little fragments of what I say and trying to say I'm wrong. When also I think you know exactly what I mean by things like "trappings". it's an earth-based show with one cast member primarily, it's different to normal. I liked it too, I just said I don't want too many like this as I like exploration episodes.

Which is my opinion. And won't change. My job is not to be clear to you. Move on if you don't get it or don't like it.
 
No, it's meant to say I can have an opinion and you will not quell me.

Respect others. You're taking little fragments of what I say and trying to say I'm wrong. When also I think you know exactly what I mean by things like "trappings". it's an earth-based show with one cast member primarily, it's different to normal. I liked it too, I just said I don't want too many like this as I like exploration episodes.

Which is my opinion. And won't change. My job is not to be clear to you. Move on if you don't get it or don't like it.
Who's quelling you? We're having a discussion. A back and forth. It's a discussion board it' what we do here. If I feel the "fragment" is what's wrong that's what I will quote and comment on. Again, that's how this works. Your opinions do not exist in a vacuum, exempt from response. You claim a Trek episode has to have aliens, spaceships and warp travel. I disagree post that in response. Why? Because none are need to tell a story in the Trek milieu. That's my opinion.
Yes, your "job" is to be clear to me. And mine is to be clear to you. That's part of the "social contract" of discourse. Again in my opinion.
 
No, it's meant to say I can have an opinion and you will not quell me.

Respect others. You're taking little fragments of what I say and trying to say I'm wrong. When also I think you know exactly what I mean by things like "trappings". it's an earth-based show with one cast member primarily, it's different to normal. I liked it too, I just said I don't want too many like this as I like exploration episodes.

Which is my opinion. And won't change. My job is not to be clear to you. Move on if you don't get it or don't like it.

I get exactly what youre saying. One of my favorite TOS eps is The Corbomite Manuever. Eps like that are getting far and few between these days. Just a ep with them encountering something strange and terrifying in space. No politics, no time travel, no romulans, no klingons etc. Just them out it an unexplored area finding something new. The original series didnt have great effects and sets all the time but it did feel like they were out there just exploring.
 
No, you don't discuss you keep saying "You're wrong". Over and over. And it gets tiresome.

I never said you need those things. "You claim a Trek episode has to have aliens, spaceships and warp travel." I never ONCE said that. Not. ONCE. You're inventing stuff and using that as a basis for your so-called discussion.

You have posted about 90k posts I see. You might do better if you stopped, read, and thought about what people are saying and if you feel you have something to contribute. Because spraying posts at people particularly about stuff you are imagining is very tiresome. Please stop responding to me.
 
I get exactly what youre saying. One of my favorite TOS eps is The Corbomite Manuever. Eps like that are getting far and few between these days. Just a ep with them encountering something strange and terrifying on space. No politics, no time travel, no romulans, no klingins etc. Just them put it an unexplored area finding something new. The original series didnt have great effects abd sets all the time but it did feel like they were out there just exploring.

Exactly this. Thank you. I'm not saying Star Trek should be purely this. I showed VOY's the "The Fear" to a friend the other day as I love it. It's not typical Voyager. I also am not saying I disliked the last SNW, as I did quite enjoy it. But in a short run as I said above "I don't want too many like this as I like exploration episodes".

It's such an innocuous opinion as well, to be hammered over. :rommie:
 
Exactly this. Thank you. I'm not saying Star Trek should be purely this. I showed VOY's the "The Fear" to a friend the other day as I love it. It's not typical Voyager. I also am not saying I disliked the last SNW, as I did quite enjoy it. But in a short run as I said above "I don't want too many like this as I like exploration episodes".

It's such an innocuous opinion as well, to be hammered over. :rommie:


Oh yeah. I havent seen that ep in years. I love it. I need to rewatch voyager soon.
 
I never said you need those things. "You claim a Trek episode has to have aliens, spaceships and warp travel." I never ONCE said that. Not. ONCE. You're inventing stuff and using that as a basis for your so-called discussion.
Hmmm
Well by trappings I mean lots of aliens, space ships, warping etc.
You have posted about 90k posts I see. You might do better if you stopped, read, and thought about what people are saying and if you feel you have something to contribute.
Perhaps you should do the same. You seem very on edge when people disagree with you,
 
Thank you for quoting me and making my point.

I politely asked you to stop responding to me. Respect my wishes. Final request.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top