And I love how there are already people outraged at the "token gays" of Star Trek.
That was the short, flirtatious scene. They're just holding hands and playing kal-toh..Which is simply, hey, give us at least, like, one or two short scene with flirtatious or lingering looks or something like that!
How come we didnt get 18 pages of "I dont have a problem with it BUT" when Jurati and Rios hooked up
And yet, here you are, in a thread titled "On Seven and sexuality".I really, honestly, couldn’t give a flying f*ck what Seven’s sexuality is or isn’t..
And yet, here you are, in a thread titled "On Seven and sexuality".
Of course. Just pointing out you care enough to post that you don't care.I'm not allowed to express an opinion....?
.
Post: Yes. Poster: No.And you felt the need to be that much of a smart-arse because...?
For my part, I don't much care about Jurati or Rios (yet - that may change). I didn't find their hookup particularly believable or credible either but I'm not interested enough in either of them to comment about it, let alone start a thread. Seven, however, is a well-established and (reasonably) popular character. Stands to reason people would want to talk about her now she's reappeared (so to speak).A very good point. The rather sudden arrival of that relationship didn't cause anyone to bat an eye.
What of it? This is a discussion board, after all. People are allowed to discuss stuff. (And a local mod has spoken as I typed this, so enough said about that.)And yet, here you are, in a thread titled "On Seven and sexuality".
And I love how there are already people outraged at the "token gays" of Star Trek.
I don't see anyone "outraged" that a gay relationship was suggested. More just irritated with how it was done.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.