• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

NuTrek's big, controversial premises

In all honesty, I’ve never been for the “real Trek” or “CBS says its canon” argument. It is fans trying to add critical weight to a failing property. More important to tell entertaining stories than what is or isn’t canon or “real Trek”. Somewhere along the way, fans and CBS lost track of the good storytelling part of the equation.
I'm not sure what you mean by the "CBS says it's[sic] canon argument". As the rightsholder, CBS gets to declare what is or isn't canon. That's not an argument; it's merely a fact. Perhaps I've misinterpreted you?

And unless you're planning to write Trek novels or such, what is or isn't canon seems as though it should be pretty irrelevant, unless you're arguing with someone over whether or not something occurred within the canonical works or such.

...or you're (the general you, not you specifically) one of those people who doesn't really know what the word 'canon' means and uses terms like 'headcanon' when a less misleading term would be 'personal continuity'.
 
It absolutely has changed. Massively. TV is always reflective of the time it is made in. Whether it be a cop drama or a sci-fi series.
My apologies I misunderstood what you meant. Yes its very nature as a TV show indeed reflects the eras they were made in. Quite unfortunately so for TOS and the 60s sensibilities therein.
 
I'm not sure what you mean by the "CBS says it's[sic] canon argument". As the rightsholder, CBS gets to declare what is or isn't canon. That's not an argument; it's merely a fact. Perhaps I've misinterpreted you?

They can declare all they want. It doesn’t make their product any better. Instead of handing decrees from the corporate office they had focused on better storytelling we wouldn’t be headed for another Trek hiatus.

I’ve said all along that the only thing CBS should have ever publicly said about canon is that they will tell try to tell the best stories possible and let the fans sort out how it all fit together.

I miss the days when “canon” wasn’t connected to Trek. When it was just about enjoying the stories.
 
...it scares me to think there must be people out there who feel Trek...especially newer Trek...isn't real because it isn't as "wholesome" as older entries in the franchise.

One step removed from, "This isn't real Star Trek because it's too woke!"

That's probably what they intended by being so vague without saying "trek is too woke" I get it you don't like it why continue to watch it then?
 
They can declare all they want. It doesn’t make their product any better.
Subjectivity. I can quite confidently tell you just for example Academy season 1 is better than a few seasons of TNG.
Instead of handing decrees from the corporate office they had focused on better storytelling we wouldn’t be headed for another Trek hiatus.
We probably would anyway the streaming bubble is sort of bursting and Trek is a bit too niche to hold an entire platform afloat.
 
Quite unfortunately so for TOS and the 60s sensibilities therein.

Those 90’s catsuits aren’t aging particularly well.

Subjectivity. I can quite confidently tell you just for example Academy season 1 is better than a few seasons of TNG.

Right now, I have SFA at two “goodish” episodes, two mediocre and three that are pretty bad. Which isn’t in the same national park of pretty much any Berman season and I’m quite critical of the Berman years.
 
Because many viewers have invested a lot of their time and money in the franchise. There’s always that hope of recapturing past glory in some small way.
I feel that way every time I watch a new episode. Academy, SNW, Lower Decks, Picard and Discovery all take me to my Trek themed happy place, the exact same as DS9, Voyager, TNG and Enterprise.

On the one hand I suppose good on you for not giving up hope but on the other sometimes there comes a point where the only reasonable course of action is to quit.
Those 90’s catsuits aren’t aging particularly well.
They most certainly are not.
 
On the one hand I suppose good on you for not giving up hope but on the other sometimes there comes a point where the only reasonable course of action is to quit.

I’ve been watching for fifty years and Trek helped me through a pretty traumatic childhood. So, I’ll always give it a chance to impress me. The Kurtzman-era animated shows have impressed me immensely. The live-action stuff is another matter entirely. I’ve eventually given up on each of those. Well, except SFA, not sure if I’ll continue with it or not. It does have bright spots.

Plus, we really can’t afford to have anyone quit, if the franchise is to hang around.
 
I’ve been watching for fifty years and Trek helped me through a pretty traumatic childhood. So, I’ll always give it a chance to impress me.
I'm sorry that happened to you.
The Kurtzman-era animated shows have impressed me immensely. The live-action stuff is another matter entirely. I’ve eventually given up on each of those. Well, except SFA, not sure if I’ll continue with it or not. It does have bright spots.
I'm sorry that the new stuff doesnt bring you the joy it brings me.
Plus, we really can’t afford to have anyone quit, if the franchise is to hang around.
It'll probably always be around, we're most likely heading to reboot town anyway and my stop is before then.
 
Somewhere along the way, fans and CBS lost track of the good storytelling part of the equation.
Just look at the flap over TAS and you'll understand tht canon argument. "Real Star Trek" started when Roddenberry started insisting this entertainment franchise carried a deeper meaning and only real Trek mattered.

It does not matter if the product is loved by 1 or 1 million, unless it is a reboot starting over it is still as legitimate and true as that which came before it. It does not become less so even if the majority of the fandom doesn't like it, wanting it to go away or wanting it to be declared this or that is just the hallmark of a fandom full of gatekeeping crybabies.

You can personally headcanon something out of existence or tweak something to better fit the whole in cases where some writers didn't really care but that will always be an entirely individual thing.
With a franchise using time travel the idea of "true Trek" falls apart. Things can change because of any number of factors from the Temporal Wars and other such nonsense.
 
I lived through the 70’s and 80’s and after Enterprise was cancelled, dry spells don’t really phase me anymore.
I had TOS on VHS. I move on through various Trek shows and films. It peaked for me in 09. There's nothing more the franchise needs to do nor am I owed anything by it.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top