Can you post pics of the spine and back too?
I gotta tell you, that's filling me with desire; I may have to order that.
This was the only photo I took. I don't have the book yet either.
Neil
Ah, OK.
Can you post pics of the spine and back too?
I gotta tell you, that's filling me with desire; I may have to order that.
This was the only photo I took. I don't have the book yet either.
Neil
Can you post pics of the spine and back too?
I gotta tell you, that's filling me with desire; I may have to order that.
Can you post pics of the spine and back too?
I gotta tell you, that's filling me with desire; I may have to order that.
The back of the book can be found here...
http://trekmovie.com/2014/07/18/fir...-on-making-of-star-trek-tmp-coming-this-fall/
Very true. But the difference between having a physical copy and a virtual one should still give rise to some discount in price shouldn't it? In contrast to the initial statement, anyway.Why charge the same price? The costs of printing and distribution would be negligible!For the Life of me, I cannot understand (Given Limited Run and Printing Costs, not to mention shipping from Hong Kong and the resultant delays) why this book was not distributed Digitally. A project like this seemingly SCREAMS to be done in that format, and you could still charge the same price.....
But that's a small part of the cost of creating a book. Most of the cost is labour, the person-hours invested by the writer, editor, copy-editors, proofreaders, typesetters, designers, cover artist, etc. After all, you're not paying for the paper, since you could buy a ream of paper for a few bucks. You're paying for the content. And the content is the same in either medium. So the cost in electronic form might be a little cheaper, but not immensely so.
Very true. But the difference between having a physical copy and a virtual one should still give rise to some discount in price shouldn't it? In contrast to the initial statement, anyway.Why charge the same price? The costs of printing and distribution would be negligible!
But that's a small part of the cost of creating a book. Most of the cost is labour, the person-hours invested by the writer, editor, copy-editors, proofreaders, typesetters, designers, cover artist, etc. After all, you're not paying for the paper, since you could buy a ream of paper for a few bucks. You're paying for the content. And the content is the same in either medium. So the cost in electronic form might be a little cheaper, but not immensely so.
Regardless, I am also waiting eagerly for my copy! Sadly, being in the UK I suspect I will have to wait a while longer.
In this case, since it's being sold direct from the publisher, there isn't.There is no clear economic "better" or "worse" that would come into play price-wise; some people prefer the physical sensations and permanency, others prefer the lessened space and increased portability.
In this case, since it's being sold direct from the publisher, there isn't.There is no clear economic "better" or "worse" that would come into play price-wise; some people prefer the physical sensations and permanency, others prefer the lessened space and increased portability.
For books sold via the general distribution channels, the publisher gets a bigger cut of the ebook price from the retailer. (70%, versus 65% or less of the print copy.) And they don't need to deal with warehousing/returns.
All in all, assuming identical royalty amounts for the author, the publisher needs to charge less in order to make the same amount of money; unfortunately few of them actually do so, at least for "mass market" titles.
...to some people, having a physical copy is a boon over virtual that's worth extra price, while to others, having a virtual copy is a boon over physical that's worth extra price.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.