He'd probably poison himself first by accident, if his "survival skills" are any indication.
Let's make a list of how many characters in Trek that were seriously romantcally involved that shared quarters and see.
You go make a list. I don't care about this topic that much (other than pointing out that to argue that Neelix was a pedophile is just ridiculously stupid no matter how you try to justify it to yourself).
Aren't the Ocampa just able to have one baby at all? So they have to wait untill they are ready, fuck once and then stop? I hope not. Poor things...Usually, one is considered biologically ready for "action" once one is able to reproduce. Kes wasn't.My goodness people. Ocampa live only 9 years. How long are they supposed to wait before getting a little action!
Let's make a list of how many characters in Trek that were seriously romantcally involved that shared quarters and see.
You go make a list. I don't care about this topic that much (other than pointing out that to argue that Neelix was a pedophile is just ridiculously stupid no matter how you try to justify it to yourself).
Try and follow the debate.
I wasn't arguing Neelix was a pedophile, just the opposite.
TOS has different standards for continuity.
Lied to Janeway straight out of the gate. Towed her into a clusterfuck that lasted two years and no one even noticed he was the root of all that scuffle.
Plenty wily.
I think Neelix can be considered the Jar Jar Binks of Voyager in a different way. When people saw The Phantom Menace, it was easy to just hate Jar Jar Binks, because he was the most obvious example of why the movie was awful. There was a whole lot more going on that was awful in that movie, but Jar Jar was just the most obvious thing, so people layed into him without considering the fact that the whole movie didnt work.
I think its the same with Voyager. Was Neelix really any worse than any other character? No. However, he was obnoxious, ugly and basically like something you would find in a childrens show. So he gets dumped on.
I think Neelix can be considered the Jar Jar Binks of Voyager in a different way. When people saw The Phantom Menace, it was easy to just hate Jar Jar Binks, because he was the most obvious example of why the movie was awful. There was a whole lot more going on that was awful in that movie, but Jar Jar was just the most obvious thing, so people layed into him without considering the fact that the whole movie didnt work.
I think its the same with Voyager. Was Neelix really any worse than any other character? No. However, he was obnoxious, ugly and basically like something you would find in a childrens show. So he gets dumped on.
I think you're kind of reaching here.
The reason why Jar Jar is an appropriate microcosm of the problems TPM had was because he was designed mostly for kids, his "humor" was awkward and banal, etc.
TPM was the most childish of the prequel scripts and so the example works.
How is Neelix a microcosm of what went wrong for Voyager?(Just to accept your premise-I rather like Voyager and think it's unfairly criticized)
Because he's awkward and ugly? So you're saying Voyager was awkward and ugly? Because he looked like a kids' character? But Voyager wasn't designed for children, specifically.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.