Brent is correct, there is no reason this can't be done. But don't think you'll get rich doing it--it has already been done. You can get the cables for about $20. Or you could use my perennial favorite, scp.TremblingBluStar said:
I'm sure there is a technical reason why this cannot be done that is beyond Microsoft's control. It's more the area of the hardware vendors and the USB Standards Board to do this.Cutter John said:
Boy you'd think after all these years MS would come up with a more idiot friendly way of tranferring files. Like linking the two machines via a USB cable of something.
Brent said:
I don't see any hardware limitations, only software ones.
How about this, a bluetooth wireless USB stick on both computers for transfering files with no cables!
Alaedhros said:
Brent is correct, there is no reason this can't be done. But don't think you'll get rich doing it--it has already been done. You can get the cables for about $20.
Correct; I was talking about these. As GMac noted, however, ethernet is faster (and, IMHO, easier).Zero Hour said:
Alaedhros said:
Brent is correct, there is no reason this can't be done. But don't think you'll get rich doing it--it has already been done. You can get the cables for about $20.
Those aren't ordinary USB cables, though.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.