What would you say are the most sympathetic and unsympathetic villains in the Star Trek franchise?
Most Trek villains are sympathetic in some manner. If there were any who were unsympathetic, I'd say Weyoun. For the most part, he seemed to enjoy just being a douche. But even he yearned to please the Founders, or even just Odo.
I guess the Xindi Reptilian Commander from Enterprise was pretty heartless, given he allegedly killed his baby grandchild.
I can't sympathize with Soran AT ALL. He understood what it felt like to lose people he cared about but was more than willing to inflict that on others just to get to what he knew was *an illusion* of having his family back - something he could have also achieved with readily available holodeck technology. F*ck that guy.I would think that Dr Soran from Generations, and the Vidiians from Voyager, are rather sympathetic as villains. I also felt a bit of minor sympathy for the Trabe (not the ancestors who oppressed the Kazon, but the younger generations who cannot find a new home).
For unsympathetic, I feel the Romulans are usually up there, as are most of the Ferengi (except for Quark when he is a "villain" of an episode). I think the most unsympathetic in my mind has to be Q.
I like Weyoun. He was witty, and actually *incredibly* reasonable and even nice most of the time, within the restrictions that genetic (and probably cultural) engineering put on him.And yet, how much of Weyoun was the genetic programming? The Vorta were, he said, little more than tree-dwelling creatures before geneticists blessed them with greater sophistication. I wonder how much of that was increased loyalty programming.
Agreed.^ I wouldn't consider her such. Charvanek was a Romulan patriot, nothing more ominous than that. She was not villainous in any way, that I could see.
She was willing to let Spock die a horrible death despite their previous intimacy.^ I wouldn't consider her such. Charvanek was a Romulan patriot, nothing more ominous than that. She was not villainous in any way, that I could see.
Indeed. (shudder)@Wormhole: Agreed on the Xindi commander. What a bastard.![]()
He was guilty of espionage and subterfuge. She can't go soft just because they shared a moment.She was willing to let Spock die a horrible death despite their previous intimacy.^ I wouldn't consider her such. Charvanek was a Romulan patriot, nothing more ominous than that. She was not villainous in any way, that I could see.
I don't feel like we're given enough about the Romulans onscreen to decide - certain leaders, yes, but not Romulans in general. And going by some of the novel materials, I find their motives understandable.
IMO, the Romulan commander in "The Enterprise Incident" was a highly sympathetic villain--if one can consider her a villain at all.
I would think that Dr Soran from Generations, and the Vidiians from Voyager, are rather sympathetic as villains. I also felt a bit of minor sympathy for the Trabe (not the ancestors who oppressed the Kazon, but the younger generations who cannot find a new home).
For unsympathetic, I feel the Romulans are usually up there, as are most of the Ferengi (except for Quark when he is a "villain" of an episode). I think the most unsympathetic in my mind has to be Q.
I think Quark may well have been bullshitting when he said the Ferengi have never engaged in slavery. Either that, or he was just ignorant of his own history.
In fact, the Ferengi consider at least one group to be their slaves: women.
Ferengi females are slaves. At least they were until Ishka came along. She helped bring about a reformation in Ferengi attitudes towards women, but before that, Ferengi women were definitely enslaved.
I mean, they couldn't wear clothes, leave their homes, earn profit, or speak until spoken to. If that isn't slavery, what is?![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.