• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Marvel Cinematic Universe spoiler-heavy speculation thread

What grade would you give the Marvel Cinematic Universe? (Ever-Changing Question)


  • Total voters
    188
It's established that, pre-Loki (the series), the TVA pruned any deviations from the Sacred Timeline as per He Who Remains' edicts.

Coulson's resurrection would, by the TVA's rules, be a deviation from the Sacred Timeline and therefore subject to being pruned.
Who said it was a deviation from the sacred timeline? Since it happened and the TVA didn’t care, it must be part of the sacred timeline.
 
Coulson's resurrection would, by the TVA's rules, be a deviation from the Sacred Timeline and therefore subject to being pruned.
We have no way to know that. As far as anyone knows his resurrection could have been native to the so-called 'sacred timeline'. I say that as someone who doesn't have a horse in the race either way.
 

Never heard of that website.

Well, there was that trailer I posted the other day... :lol:

Honestly, this is all my fault. I obviously shouldn't have posted those Chloe Bennet quotes. :lol:

I don't blame the messenger. I blame others for going to useless places when it comes to discussion.
 
Even if one wants to believe that Loki Episode isn't definitive proof in and of itself against the AoS is Sacred,Timeline Canon argument, one has to still explain how/why Coulson's resurrection isn't a massive violation of the TVA's protocols whilst 2012 Loki stealing the Tesseract is, which is not something thar,I've ever seen.

IIRC, it wasn't that Loki just stole the Tesseract. It was the effects he was going to have after his teleportation.
 
It's established that, pre-Loki (the series), the TVA pruned any deviations from the Sacred Timeline as per He Who Remains' edicts.

Coulson's resurrection would, by the TVA's rules, be a deviation from the Sacred Timeline and therefore subject to being pruned.

Where is it said that his resurrection wasn't a part of the Sacred Timeline? All I know is some document that Feige has posted in his bathroom that gets changed and altered every so often.
 
In typical Mark Ruffalo fashion, Mark Ruffalo has neither confirmed nor denied his participation in the next Spider-Man movie with one breath, while saying he can't wait to work with Jon Bernthal with the next. :lol:

He also says that he has not seen a script and I recall reading Tom Holland saying recently that he hasn't either. That doesn't surprise me given their reputations. I imagine they won't get their script pages until the day on the set ready to shoot. :lol:

 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top