At the time internet wasn't really a thing.Did people have fits like they do now when things like the Alien movies or Terminator 2 came out?
At the time internet wasn't really a thing.Did people have fits like they do now when things like the Alien movies or Terminator 2 came out?
Sexism actually kind of helped the "Alien" movie at the time. I don't think people at the time expected Ripley to be the one that survives and kills the monster at the end of the movie. Thus people were even more surprised at the twist and turns. Especially Tom Skeritt being killed off in the middle of the movie. I bet most people at the time felt he would be the ultimate hero of the movie at the time.
she's the final girl in a slasher movie... in spaaaaace
She might be the first final girl? Or maybe second. I guess Texas Chainsaw Massacre had already came out.
And Halloween would’ve barely beaten it to the punch I believe in 1978.She might be the first final girl? Or maybe second. I guess Texas Chainsaw Massacre had already came out.
No one in their right mind would argue that Ripley is not the lead in Aliens.
Not making moral judgments. Just noticing something I think is common in most of these female led movies that have had success and not taken lots of neckbeard heat. Still I wouldn't say the women aren't allowed to be the genuine leads in these movies or shows.. Ripley,Buffy,Sarah Connor for example are not characters hurt by the strong male characters in the movies. It's more along the lines I think of men wanting to see the male perspective represented in the movies so they have someone they can relate to.
One complaint I notice from lots of them is that in movies they do hate on is because they feel the men in the movies are written as being weak or over the top evil in order to make the female character look good in comparison. Basically they are their to be like a jobber in wrestling. Where as the movies they do like the male character is allowed to also be good and well written, just like the female lead.
Funny, no one complained that the Marines all came off as incompetents next to a lady who'd never held a rifle before.
And Halloween would’ve barely beaten it to the punch I believe in 1978.
I've another theory: both of these films are science fiction films. For viewers of the time, the "strong" woman was a fantastic element like the Alien and the Terminator. There was no thought whatsoever of any political agenda. It was simply something that had no bearing on reality. Complaining about it would have been like saying Cameron wanted to make propaganda for the Xenomorphs.Did people have fits like they do now when things like the Alien movies or Terminator 2 came out?
And Halloween would’ve barely beaten it to the punch I believe in 1978.
Which is why that movie would be hated if it came out today. We've regressed.
Funny, no one complained that the Marines all came off as incompetents next to a lady who'd never held a rifle before.
Yeah, no.Plus everyone loves Bill Paxton in the movie.
I've another theory: both of these films are science fiction films. For viewers of the time, the "strong" woman was a fantastic element like the Alien and the Terminator. There was no thought whatsoever of any political agenda. It was simply something that had no bearing on reality. Complaining about it would have been like saying Cameron wanted to make propaganda for the Xenomorphs.
The problem is when women also began to have roles previously typically reserved for men (see for example in the armed forces). Men with fragile masculinity began to feel threatened and therefore any work of fiction that in some way reflected this social novelty becomes a work of propaganda, woke, SJW or whatever term is in fashion now.
Legitimately shocking.Yeah, no.
What I don't get is why Spider-Gwen didn't get all the usual "She's SJW Propaganda!" complaints tossed at her like other female characters do.
So it's fine as long as the woman never ever gets to be a genuine lead and always is overshadowed by men?
Kind of like when you use the term "neckbeard" as a winking synonym for a bad person, implying that those whose facial hair style diverges from the prevailing fashion of the day necessarily deserve mockery and derision?Your right in that they are not always wrong at least on the surface but lots of them know what kind of feelings in people they are playing to. Some of them like to go after what I call low hanging targets.
Cameron admits in his commentary that some of them act unprofessionally and un-Marine like, especially in the shipboard scenes. His brother later became a Marine, and he made an effort to more accurately portray the Marine mindset in the Avatar movies.Funny, no one complained that the Marines all came off as incompetents next to a lady who'd never held a rifle before.
It's only fair. Otherwise the prevailing fashion of the day would get all the mockery and derision.Kind of like when you use the term "neckbeard" as a winking synonym for a bad person, implying that those whose facial hair style diverges from the prevailing fashion of the day necessarily deserve mockery and derision?![]()
That's completely bullshit, and nothing more than a dumbass excuse to try to cover up the fact that they're just sexist assholes. They just want to make themselves out to be the heroes fighting for the poor men even anybody who actually watches the movies or shows can tell that everything they're saying is complete bullshit.Not making moral judgments. Just noticing something I think is common in most of these female led movies that have had success and not taken lots of neckbeard heat. Still I wouldn't say the women aren't allowed to be the genuine leads in these movies or shows.. Ripley,Buffy,Sarah Connor for example are not characters hurt by the strong male characters in the movies. It's more along the lines I think of men wanting to see the male perspective represented in the movies so they have someone they can relate to.
One complaint I notice from lots of them is that in movies they do hate on is because they feel the men in the movies are written as being weak or over the top evil in order to make the female character look good in comparison. Basically they are their to be like a jobber in wrestling. Where as the movies they do like the male character is allowed to also be good and well written, just like the female lead.
Sure, but people still talked, and I think a lot of the old magazines had letter columns, so there were still ways for people's complaints to get out.At the time internet wasn't really a thing.
That seems more likely to me.I've another theory: both of these films are science fiction films. For viewers of the time, the "strong" woman was a fantastic element like the Alien and the Terminator. There was no thought whatsoever of any political agenda. It was simply something that had no bearing on reality. Complaining about it would have been like saying Cameron wanted to make propaganda for the Xenomorphs.
The problem is when women also began to have roles previously typically reserved for men (see for example in the armed forces). Men with fragile masculinity began to feel threatened and therefore any work of fiction that in some way reflected this social novelty becomes a work of propaganda, woke, SJW or whatever term is in fashion now.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.