• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Madame Web, go-go Marvel Fatigue!

How good was it?

  • A. Madame Web is just as Good as a REAL Marvel Movie.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • B. There were moments that were approaching great, like random M&Ms mixed into a box of raisins.

    Votes: 4 22.2%
  • C. The crew must have been held at gunpoint to continue and finish their work?

    Votes: 2 11.1%
  • D. Adam Scott stole the movie! Where the hell is Severance Season 2?

    Votes: 3 16.7%
  • E. This travesty will finally capsize the home Blu Ray/DVD market!

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • F. A lady gave birth in the seat next to me, the baby realized where it was, and crawled back in.

    Votes: 9 50.0%

  • Total voters
    18
Sexism actually kind of helped the "Alien" movie at the time. I don't think people at the time expected Ripley to be the one that survives and kills the monster at the end of the movie. Thus people were even more surprised at the twist and turns. Especially Tom Skeritt being killed off in the middle of the movie. I bet most people at the time felt he would be the ultimate hero of the movie at the time.

They killed off Doctor f%cking Who first. If anyone was going to get "most" of them out of that mess alive, it was our 2nd favourite Timelord.
 
No one in their right mind would argue that Ripley is not the lead in Aliens.

Which is why that movie would be hated if it came out today. We've regressed.

Not making moral judgments. Just noticing something I think is common in most of these female led movies that have had success and not taken lots of neckbeard heat. Still I wouldn't say the women aren't allowed to be the genuine leads in these movies or shows.. Ripley,Buffy,Sarah Connor for example are not characters hurt by the strong male characters in the movies. It's more along the lines I think of men wanting to see the male perspective represented in the movies so they have someone they can relate to.

One complaint I notice from lots of them is that in movies they do hate on is because they feel the men in the movies are written as being weak or over the top evil in order to make the female character look good in comparison. Basically they are their to be like a jobber in wrestling. Where as the movies they do like the male character is allowed to also be good and well written, just like the female lead.

Funny, no one complained that the Marines all came off as incompetents next to a lady who'd never held a rifle before.
 
Funny, no one complained that the Marines all came off as incompetents next to a lady who'd never held a rifle before.

You talking about Ripley or Newt?

P.S.

Ripley knew how to shoot, what that is that she was doing is called flirting.
 
And Halloween would’ve barely beaten it to the punch I believe in 1978.

Well there's Black Christmas
(although it's kinda implied the final girl actually gets killed at the end)
and if you treated Peeping Tom and Psycho as proto Slashers then there are even earlier final girls.
 
Did people have fits like they do now when things like the Alien movies or Terminator 2 came out?
I've another theory: both of these films are science fiction films. For viewers of the time, the "strong" woman was a fantastic element like the Alien and the Terminator. There was no thought whatsoever of any political agenda. It was simply something that had no bearing on reality. Complaining about it would have been like saying Cameron wanted to make propaganda for the Xenomorphs.

The problem is when women also began to have roles previously typically reserved for men (see for example in the armed forces). Men with fragile masculinity began to feel threatened and therefore any work of fiction that in some way reflected this social novelty becomes a work of propaganda, woke, SJW or whatever term is in fashion now.
 
Which is why that movie would be hated if it came out today. We've regressed.



Funny, no one complained that the Marines all came off as incompetents next to a lady who'd never held a rifle before.

I don't think the Marines came off as incompetent. They came off as being outmatched. Plus you got the Hicks character. Plus everyone loves Bill Paxton in the movie. The movie also has one of the female type of characters tend to love and that is the badass one of the guys characters such as Vasquez. Also didn't matter if Ripley held a rifle. The character was already beloved. Plus she has the badass ending with the forklift and he "Get away from her you bitch" fight. Basically it has everything in it that your typical 80's male would love in a movie.
 
I've another theory: both of these films are science fiction films. For viewers of the time, the "strong" woman was a fantastic element like the Alien and the Terminator. There was no thought whatsoever of any political agenda. It was simply something that had no bearing on reality. Complaining about it would have been like saying Cameron wanted to make propaganda for the Xenomorphs.

The problem is when women also began to have roles previously typically reserved for men (see for example in the armed forces). Men with fragile masculinity began to feel threatened and therefore any work of fiction that in some way reflected this social novelty becomes a work of propaganda, woke, SJW or whatever term is in fashion now.

I think a big issue was these older movies and even modern movies with strong female characters that are liked is that since they also have strong male characters they feel less like a threat to Boomer and Gen X culture. Some of these movies disliked are because they feel like they are part of the culture war.

What happens though is many of these movies are also bad and the characters people complaining about are also bad because all of it is being made in a non-artistic corporate setting. The Disney effect on Hollywood in essence. So you get endless reboots. All the strong female characters often just feel like carbon copies of each other because lots of the choices being made are not coming from the artist but business guys and ladies in suits. I mean just look at the MCU. Unless you happen to be James Gunn they seem to just pick directors who will do whatever the studio dictates to them. If you want to something unique you don't get hired or you end up getting fired like Edgar Wright on "Ant-Man."

Thing is though is when you look outside of the sort of mainstream popcorn movies lots of the issues happening with those movies don't exist. A24 movies are never going to be ruined by some suit telling them how to make a movie or appeal to a modern audience or China. They let the artist make art so the movies are usually great and many of them of course explore progressive themes but not through a corporate filter.
 
By the way, the real prototype of "tough female soldier not interested in some romantic relationship" was the character of McCoy, played by Amy Madigan in Street of Fire (1984).

aminsof.jpg
 
What I don't get is why Spider-Gwen didn't get all the usual "She's SJW Propaganda!" complaints tossed at her like other female characters do.
So it's fine as long as the woman never ever gets to be a genuine lead and always is overshadowed by men?

I don't identify as an anti-wokester or a fan of anti-wokesters, and I certainly won't tell you that anti-wokesters, particularly on YouTube, are the most enlightened people out there, that they don't rile regularly themselves up with negativity for clicks, or even that they generally have good or constructive intent. That said, I also don't believe they're invariably malicious people who're so obsessed with hating everything non-cis white male that they calculate every opinion for maximum bile, nor do I think it's helpful to reflexively assume that.

Yes, their opinions are often toxic and confrontational, but that doesn't mean every opinion they hold is necessarily wrong. For instance, I personally agree with The Critical Drinker that Star Trek Beyond is wildly overrated crap, and that The Last Jedi is an insult to the character of Luke Skywalker, but he likes both the mostly female-centric House of the Dragon S1 and the POC-led with a cartoonishly villainous white antagonist RRR better than I did.

So, IMHO, one can by all means call them out when they spout toxic bullsh*t if one likes, and if one thinks that that's more helpful than heeding the wise adage of "Don't feed the trolls." But, IMHO again, to actively look for reasons to discount their opinions every time one agrees with them (such as, in praising the heroines of T2 and Aliens) is an obnoxious waste of time.
 
Your right in that they are not always wrong at least on the surface but lots of them know what kind of feelings in people they are playing to. Some of them like to go after what I call low hanging targets. Easy characters to pick on because they aren't really all that good to help promote the main objective which is to win the culture war against more modern ideas.

When you have a good character like say Ms Marvel they instead change tactics and talk about things like "Who was this made for?" It's because they can't attack the quality, but instead the lack of popularity in low ratings or lack of profit made. Which is where they once again get to use truth to manipulate for their bigger agenda because it is kind of true. The show wasn't popular except for those of us who liked it which wasn't many. It was almost certain to always be a niche type of show. A cult classic within the bigger more mainstream MCU stuff. But they will only begrudgingly admit to the good stuff about the character or show.
 
Your right in that they are not always wrong at least on the surface but lots of them know what kind of feelings in people they are playing to. Some of them like to go after what I call low hanging targets.
Kind of like when you use the term "neckbeard" as a winking synonym for a bad person, implying that those whose facial hair style diverges from the prevailing fashion of the day necessarily deserve mockery and derision? ;)


Funny, no one complained that the Marines all came off as incompetents next to a lady who'd never held a rifle before.
Cameron admits in his commentary that some of them act unprofessionally and un-Marine like, especially in the shipboard scenes. His brother later became a Marine, and he made an effort to more accurately portray the Marine mindset in the Avatar movies.

That said, the actors' charisma, and Cameron's memorable lines and character arcs go a long way, and of course Hicks isn't portrayed as an incompetent; he'd be leading the fight if he hadn't gotten injured.
 
Not making moral judgments. Just noticing something I think is common in most of these female led movies that have had success and not taken lots of neckbeard heat. Still I wouldn't say the women aren't allowed to be the genuine leads in these movies or shows.. Ripley,Buffy,Sarah Connor for example are not characters hurt by the strong male characters in the movies. It's more along the lines I think of men wanting to see the male perspective represented in the movies so they have someone they can relate to.

One complaint I notice from lots of them is that in movies they do hate on is because they feel the men in the movies are written as being weak or over the top evil in order to make the female character look good in comparison. Basically they are their to be like a jobber in wrestling. Where as the movies they do like the male character is allowed to also be good and well written, just like the female lead.
That's completely bullshit, and nothing more than a dumbass excuse to try to cover up the fact that they're just sexist assholes. They just want to make themselves out to be the heroes fighting for the poor men even anybody who actually watches the movies or shows can tell that everything they're saying is complete bullshit.
At the time internet wasn't really a thing.
Sure, but people still talked, and I think a lot of the old magazines had letter columns, so there were still ways for people's complaints to get out.
I've another theory: both of these films are science fiction films. For viewers of the time, the "strong" woman was a fantastic element like the Alien and the Terminator. There was no thought whatsoever of any political agenda. It was simply something that had no bearing on reality. Complaining about it would have been like saying Cameron wanted to make propaganda for the Xenomorphs.

The problem is when women also began to have roles previously typically reserved for men (see for example in the armed forces). Men with fragile masculinity began to feel threatened and therefore any work of fiction that in some way reflected this social novelty becomes a work of propaganda, woke, SJW or whatever term is in fashion now.
That seems more likely to me.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top