Isaacs said "I don't care if Trek fans die"Worst game of "Telephone" ever!![]()
I have no data to cite, only anecdotes in the form of my impression FWIW, but I don't believe that's the case. oldBSG fans who liked nuBSG "because it had good writing" weren't really those who were whining at the ways in which BSG got re-imagined, such as Starbuck's gender-switch. Those who whined never really came around and are still whining. Furthermore, there are a lot of nuBSG fans, including people who appreciate its writing, who can't really be said to be fans of the original.
.
Problem is that it's nearly impossible to tell between people who might complain because they can't let go from old Trek to people who simply don't like it. His comments could, like mentioned above, be a means of basically lumping all criticism in one category. I think it's kind of like the new "Ghoustbusters" movie. You had people who hated it because of sexism but you also had people who hated it because it was bad and others who hated it because it wasn't just bad but it was, yet another remake that doesn't do justice to a classic movie. Yet some wanted to say all criticism was due to sexism. I think "The Nostiga Critic" critic did a good job of exposing the whole issue.
I was deeply disturbed by the daytime edit of Drive Angry on my last stay in the US. "Shooting" and "blinding" while blowing people's fucking heads off. What is wrong with you Americans.Its America. Violence gets a quicker pass in the rating system verses swearing and sexual content.
Its America. Violence gets a quicker pass in the rating system verses swearing and sexual content.
That has nothing to do with whether or not Trek is or has been "family fare".
So, you whined about it, before you came around? And you understand I was speaking about aggregates, right? Exceptions don't contradict trends.Disgree. I was a fan of oldBSG and didn't initially like some of the changes like the gender swap and so forth because they felt unncesesary. However somewhere around mid-1st season I finally came around and realized that while this is a different sow then oldBSG, it is a really good show and stopped thinking about the differences and enjoyed what they were putting out.
I was deeply disturbed by the daytime edit of Drive Angry on my last stay in the US. "Shooting" and "blinding" while blowing people's fucking heads off. What is wrong with you Americans.
I may be using the wrong term (in the UK, we have our 9pm watershed, after which shows can feature swearing, violence, nudity etc), but a version of the film shown with all the swearing dubbed in various silly ways, but all the violence intact.What's a "daytime edit?"
I may be using the wrong term (in the UK, we have our 9pm watershed, after which shows can feature swearing, violence, nudity etc), but a version of the film shown with all the swearing dubbed in various silly ways, but all the violence intact.
This isn't just an American phenomenon, American films meant for an international audience are allowed to ramp up the violence, but keep the sexy sex to a minimum and avoid excessive cursing.I may be using the wrong term (in the UK, we have our 9pm watershed, after which shows can feature swearing, violence, nudity etc), but a version of the film shown with all the swearing dubbed in various silly ways, but all the violence intact.
I may be using the wrong term (in the UK, we have our 9pm watershed, after which shows can feature swearing, violence, nudity etc), but a version of the film shown with all the swearing dubbed in various silly ways, but all the violence intact.
Cable channels that aren't premium seem to focus on eliminating the nips, the sh**s and the f***s.There's no rule per se that I know of here. How much violence is left in a movie may have more to do with the venue than the hour - there are probably still kinds of violence and sex that the broadcast networks would cut but that are not considered problematic on premium cable channels.
I think it depends on the particular international area the movie is being exported to. In certain East Asian countries, violent content that would be rated R in the US will get the equivalent of a PG, whereas the least bit of sexuality will skyrocket it to a restrictive rating. Europe tends toward the opposite; frank depictions of sexuality are no big deal, whereas "The Dark Knight" got the most restrictive rating possible in Denmark and the Netherlands due to the violence. And France seems to give just about everything an "all audiences" rating, even movies that get rated R for sexual content in the US.This isn't just an American phenomenon, American films meant for an international audience are allowed to ramp up the violence, but keep the sexy sex to a minimum and avoid excessive cursing.
Violence doesn't seem to trip over as many cultural "red lines" as does sexy sex and profanity.
I'll never forget the ''FLIP YOU!'' ''No, flip YOU!!!'' version of THE BREAKFAST CLUB.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.