Have you not seen the clip showing her being brought into the TVA as a young girl?
![]()
I have now...
Have you not seen the clip showing her being brought into the TVA as a young girl?
![]()
Back on, say, TNG or DS9, when they did a character development episode, then completely forgot or ignored that development right away, what should it be called?
Given that Loki was able to change his skin color from blue to white when Odin found him as a baby, I've assumed that his shapeshifting is a present power and may be closer to a reflex than a skill he developed or was taught.I don't totally disagree with you, but there are some considerations...
Loki, and presumably Sylvie, have been around for thousands of years. Loki became a "variant" fairly recently. When did Sylvie?
Sylvie does not have "our" Loki's powers, which he learned from Frigga. She enchants others. Can she shapeshift? According to her, she just enchants.
I really don't see that Sylvie has been growing up and living her entre life with some kind of intent to reject being "another Loki" or even reject being male. She has been living her life as herself. If (and I'm not truly convinced) Sylvie is "a Loki", she is the only Loki she has ever known, and gender-fluid or not, she is comfortable and happy with who she is. I don't see anything in the story that indicates she wasn't this person all along. She's not rebelling against other timelines' versions of Loki, she simply is Sylvie.
Other than being adopted, if we trust her word on everything, we know nothing about her history. If she had a choice of gender, she may have chosen when she was six months old. Or six weeks before this series started. I love the character but we can't say anything about who or what she was beforehand, or if she actually has a choice of gender.
She has never agreed that she is "a Loki." All we have is the declaration of the TVA. And as I posted before, hands up if you believe everything they say.
I like the detail that she has naturally dark hair like Loki, I'm guessing she's around 10 or so.Have you not seen the clip showing her being brought into the TVA as a young girl?
![]()
Back on, say, TNG or DS9, when they did a character development episode, then completely forgot or ignored that development right away, what should it be called?
Oh sure, no question. The show was very deliberate in making sure the audience was aware that "our" Loki was gender fluid. I'm just wondering if her presenting as female was specifically the point of divergence and the reason she was labelled "variant", or whether that happened after the fact and the initial point of divergence was some other yet to be revealed event.Loki is gender fluid and a shapeshifter, so gender presentation is largely as personal to him as wardrobe. So Sylvie presenting as female as her default form seems to be the one she’s most comfortable with. It’s also notable that Loki never questions this since it’s likely something he’s considered doing himself but didn’t. I’m assuming that this decision is where Loki and Sylvie split. The sacred timeline states that Loki is supposed to present as male, so Sylvie got picked up by the TVA. Given that the propaganda film mentioned that the split can occur due to something as mundane as being late for work, it’s a wonder there aren’t more Lokis.
A good episode of a TV show? An entertaining story not spoiled just because future writers didn't build on it to your liking?
Hey, that's Judith from The Walking Dead! Also child Rey from The Force Awakens.Have you not seen the clip showing her being brought into the TVA as a young girl?
![]()
It’s one thing if they never build on it. It’s another if they ‘Learn a lesson’ that is completely forgotten within a week. Like if they come to an understanding with a character they have natural conflict with then a few episodes later have to exact same conflict. That sitcom crap belongs in Full House.
Maybe Loki presented as male because he was in competition with Thor.
It’s one thing if they never build on it. It’s another if they ‘Learn a lesson’ that is completely forgotten within a week.
Oh sure, no question. The show was very deliberate in making sure the audience was aware that "our" Loki was gender fluid. I'm just wondering if her presenting as female was specifically the point of divergence and the reason she was labelled "variant", or whether that happened after the fact and the initial point of divergence was some other yet to be revealed event.
She seems to have been at this for subjective centuries, so plenty of time for all sorts choices and changes from the "sacred" version of Loki. The more I think about it though the more the former makes more sense, but there could still be some twist coming. Like say for example the branch she was removed from wasn't even about her, it was about Thor making some divergent choice, further continuing the theme of a Loki being just a supporting character in their own story, AND a forgotten castoff.
Now I can't stop thinking about The Goldbergs...
How a season of "sub-modern" Star Trek was made.
The Executive producer would assign the maybe 26 episodes to each character or an ensemble of characters. Then the Executive producer would farm each of those episodes assigned to a character out to writers in the wilderness who had no idea what was happening the week before or the week after. The writers room and the Producers would then rewrite the farmed script so that it makes sense and fits in with the continuity of the season.
You can't write a season like this if you're writing story arcs.
Unless you heavily rewrite every script, and by that point why bother using outside writers?
Are you suggesting it's impossible to write episodic television without lazy one dimensional quirk driven lesson learning?
If you're not going to have continuity, that's fine, but then don't have the character develop in that episode in ways that should make a difference in other episodes. Worked for Seinfeld.
I’m reasonably sure that Sylvie is a Loki variant, just one who split off a long time ago. I’m thinking that the TVA is trying to keep the timeline from branching into any alternate universe for reasons that haven’t really been revealed. Sylvie at an early age decided to identify as female instead of male like Loki and had to be pruned or reset. Either she managed to escape or was kept at the TVA until she was old enough to be useful as a worker and then escaped, but she’s trying to take them down for taking her life away and the lives of every single variant who was ever pruned or reset. If not for the TVA she’d just be an alternate universe Loki.
I also really liked the way they handled Loki’s bisexuality.
There's a difference between stating what's possible, and simply pointing out a clear pattern of behaviour.Are you suggesting it's impossible to write episodic television without lazy one dimensional quirk driven lesson learning?
Personally I prefer the old style episodic shows over these modrrn massive story arcs. I think the X-Files was one of the first to do that, one reason I stopped watching it. I miseed a couple of shows and got list quickly- someone would toss in a reference about some guy who smokes and this would be "oooooooo", I had no idea what was going on.There's a difference between stating what's possible, and simply pointing out a clear pattern of behaviour.
The point being that equating character focused episodes from 20+year old shows that were specifically designed to have as little internal continuity as they can get away with, to character focused episode from modern, heavily serialized/arc based shows is very much a case of *checks notes* apples and oranges.![]()
If you think the X-Files was the first TV show ever to use arc based storytelling then you're very much mistaken.Personally I prefer the old style episodic shows over these modrrn massive story arcs. I think the X-Files was one of the first to do that, one reason I stopped watching it. I miseed a couple of shows and got list quickly- someone would toss in a reference about some guy who smokes and this would be "oooooooo", I had no idea what was going on.
Character development can be done in any format without 'wasting' time if done properly. One thing I like about Loki is that even background characters are interesting, even the "what's a fish" guy is fun to watch.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.