Not getting a previous explanation doesn't become an explanation in itself though, does it?
It just not that important a detail. Most Klingon episodes aren't about hair.Again, there's a difference between just changing something visually, and doing something which conflicts with prior continuity. The issue isn't that Klingons look different - the issue is there were numerous within-continuity references to the Klingons having hair. Therefore, saying all Klingons everywhere are bald, and have always been bald, sort of invalidates all the stories told before, from the asides in TNG and DS9 episodes all the way to an entire two-part story arc in ENT.
It just not that important a detail. Most Klingon episodes aren't about hair.
If the "Augment virus was never mentioned again I wouldn't miss it. It was a misstep that can be ignored.I can see that. But the whole "augment virus" thing is canonical, which means that even if we can presume that "normal" TNG-era Klingons really look like they do in DIS, there should be human-looking Klingons out there as well.
Better dramatic potential.Which is one reason why the whole weird surgical procedure to make Ash into Voq was so insane. There was something within canon which would allow Voq to get to within 90% of passing for a human. Why they chose to ignore it I will never understand.
Again, there's a difference between just changing something visually, and doing something which conflicts with prior continuity. The issue isn't that Klingons look different - the issue is there were numerous within-continuity references to the Klingons having hair.
Any time Klingons were shown, up til DSC, they were shown with hair. That's within continuity.Could you list a few of those references? Offhand I don't remember it coming up.
Could you list a few of those references? Offhand I don't remember it coming up.
Which is one reason why the whole weird surgical procedure to make Ash into Voq was so insane. There was something within canon which would allow Voq to get to within 90% of passing for a human. Why they chose to ignore it I will never understand.
I see no reason to assume that they don't exist.I can see that. But the whole "augment virus" thing is canonical, which means that even if we can presume that "normal" TNG-era Klingons really look like they do in DIS, there should be human-looking Klingons out there as well.
I feel like this is at least the third time we've all gone 'round and 'round on this topic in the last few months, but to sum up the gist of those past discussions: because something in a story that defies logic and yet is presented without explanation severely disrupts the willing suspension of disbelief and pulls one out of the story. That's why.Why does there need to an explanation?
But a real-world explanation is never really a substitute for an in-story explanation. If you're reading a novel and the only apparent explanation for some otherwise perplexing narrative event is "because the author felt like it," that's not a well-written novel. Barring some deliberate stylistic choice to break the fourth wall, it's generally not a good thing for the authors of a work to call attention to their existence. It shatters the illusion.Here's the real explanation: it's a TV show and they changed the makeup to freshen things up. No "in-universe" explanation is required.
How was it a misstep? Perhaps it wasn't the best possible explanation for the change — there's room for debate about that. But it was certainly a darn sight better than none at all.If the "Augment virus was never mentioned again I wouldn't miss it. It was a misstep that can be ignored.
Do you really think the Vog/Tyler story we got demonstrated any dramatic potential? If it had any that wasn't flagrantly wasted, I'd chalk that up entirely to the acting chops of Shazad Latif, not to the writing.Better dramatic potential.
Not getting a previous explanation doesn't become an explanation in itself though, does it?
Anger isn't the emotion, it's making sense.But that's the whole point, why would it need explaining? Why do people get so angry over this? Why does anyone even care?
They've changed before and it took 26 years for an explanation, one that was done more for fun than necessity.
Anger isn't the emotion, it's making sense.
I can see that. But the whole "augment virus" thing is canonical, which means that even if we can presume that "normal" TNG-era Klingons really look like they do in DIS, there should be human-looking Klingons out there as well.
Which is one reason why the whole weird surgical procedure to make Ash into Voq was so insane. There was something within canon which would allow Voq to get to within 90% of passing for a human. Why they chose to ignore it I will never understand.
Mot the barber goes on at length about Klingon hair when Worf goes in for a haircut in "Schisms;" DS9 made reference to Kahless forging the first bat'leth out of his own hair (or was it his enemies' hair? Either way.) That's just off the top of my head – no pun intended.
I have several photos of myself with hair.
Sadly it's otherwise just a memory....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.