Voq Jr. will also then be set on his way to become the Albino from DS9.
The Albino was never stated to be a Klingon.
Voq Jr. will also then be set on his way to become the Albino from DS9.
They also never said he wasn't klingon.The Albino was never stated to be a Klingon.
There are tons of different Klingon ridges over the course of the franchise. Look just at Kahless' compared to modern Klingons, the Klingons in the Motion Picture also had radically different ridges. Colonel Worf and the other ST6 Klingons too. Even Worf's ridges altered over the course of his appearances. Given how old the Albino is, who knows if his ridges didn't alter too with age (Kor, Kang and Koloth only got their ridges in middle/older age, so their ridges would be "younger" than the Albino's).Plus, you know, different. Sure sign of Klingonness, that.
Timo Saloniemi
They also never said he wasn't klingon.
Remember, journey to babel said spock was an only child
The official Star Trek website calls him a Klingon: http://www.startrek.com/database_article/albino-theSo? We have no reason to believe that he was beyond the makeup being somewhat similar (and we have plenty of examples of aliens that look alike, from the Trills and Kirosians to the various human lookalikes). Novels aren't canon.
I don't believe that that was stated there, but that's neither here nor there; That statement was contradicted in canon and both examples have or will allegedly have built in reasons why Spock was thought to be an only child or not talked about. There is zero canon evidence that the Albino was a Klingon, therefore no reason to die on that hill.
The official Star Trek website calls him a Klingon: http://www.startrek.com/database_article/albino-the
Well unless they do a time jump or its addressed in the Picard show (and it's hard to see what the reason for that would be), we're still way too early in the timeline for Discovery to conclusively tie Voq Jr. to the Albino.Okay, that's interesting to note, although still not canon. Wonder where they got that, given that apparently nothing in the original episode tied him to being one in the first place.
I remember seeing something (not sure the source-possible a Trek encyclopedia) listing the Albino as a "Klingon criminal." So, it has been a part of the lore for a bit.Okay, that's interesting to note, although still not canon. Wonder where they got that, given that apparently nothing in the original episode tied him to being one in the first place.
The startrek.com link up above describes the Albino that way. Perhaps it just means he is considered a criminal within the jurisdiction of the Klingon Empire, much the same as planets within their space would be considered "Klingon planets."I remember seeing something (not sure the source-possible a Trek encyclopedia) listing the Albino as a "Klingon criminal." So, it has been a part of the lore for a bit.
While that could technically be the case, that would be like describing Harry Mudd as a Klingon criminal just because he spent time in their prison.The startrek.com link up above describes the Albino that way. Perhaps it just means he is considered a criminal within the jurisdiction of the Klingon Empire, much the same as planets within their space would be considered "Klingon planets."
Kor
I'd love to put "Klingon criminal" on my resume. That would be pretty metal.While that could technically be the case, that would be like describing Harry Mudd as a Klingon criminal just because he spent time in their prison.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.