We don't need Trek either.Ugh...but we don't need to change it.
We don't need Trek either.Ugh...but we don't need to change it.
Yes we do. WW III didn't happen in the 1990s. It's silly.Ugh...but we don't need to change it.
Why is it silly? Star Trek is an alternate history, it's not our world.Yes we do. WW III didn't happen in the 1990s. It's silly.
All fiction is "alternate history." Trek is no more or less so than Blue Bloods.Why is it silly? Star Trek is an alternate history, it's not our world.
"Theatres" is a perfect name. War has always been mankind's favourite spectator sport.One could call different "theaters" (odd name) separate wars![]()
All the fussing about timelines is an example of fannish obsessive excess.
Yes.Would the show then have to come up with yet another explanation?
All fiction is "alternate history." Trek is no more or less so than Blue Bloods.
All the fussing about timelines is an example of fannish obsessive excess. Not one in every five thousand viewers sits down to watch an episode of Trek with any awareness or interest in the "alternate history" premise.
Almost everything after TOS has WW3 in the 21st Century and the Eugenics Wars in the 90s.
Ugh...but we don't need to change it.
Regardless, it's changed.What "almost everything" ? One quick line from Space Seed and Chekov saying 20th century in WoK? An easter egg background prop in a Voyager time travel story? I'm not one who discards canon lightly, but, seriously.
Why do we need to keep it?
At the time, I found it useful as a sleeping pill.Blame the Temporal Cold War.
Make it useful for something.
Phlox also said the augments were the product of 20th Century Genetics in ENT Season 4.What "almost everything" ? One quick line from Space Seed and Chekov saying 20th century in WoK? An easter egg background prop in a Voyager time travel story? I'm not one who discards canon lightly, but, seriously.
Ronald D. Moore: "The date of the Eugenics Wars is something that we have been studiously trying not to pin ourselves down about, because obviously they aren't happening around as we speak [....] What looked like the distant future in 1967 is not so distant any more. I don't blame them for not having the foresight to see that in 30 years this would become important in the series."
Terry Matalas: "We discussed endlessly. We came to the conclusion that in WW3 there were several EMP bursts that kicked everyone back decades. Records of that 75 year period, the 90s on were sketchy. Maybe Spock was wrong?" In response Khan's own references to the 1996 date, that they simply have be ignored to make the series more relatable to the present; "No easy way to do it if you want the past to look and feel like today. Maybe because in 1967 they didn't anticipate the show still going for another 6 decades."
Aaron J. Waltke added: "There's also the ripples of the Temporal Cold War shifting the Prime Timeline in Enterprise — at least until the Temporal Accords put an end to that wibbly wobbliness."
Phlox also said the augments were the product of 20th Century Genetics in ENT Season 4.
None of them directly contradicted Spock until now.
Interesting, during DS9 they didn't want to give a specific date for the Wars for basically the same reason the current writers/creators don't.
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Eugenics_Wars#Background_information
Picard:
Phlox also said the augments were the product of 20th Century Genetics in ENT Season 4.
None of them directly contradicted Spock until now.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.