He's sad because there's no war.
If we did a modern take of post-Nemesis Trek, there would be some significant updates. Nemesis, while looking good for a Trek film, is quite outdated in terms of even basic technology. It has been 15 years since then, and a great many things have changed just in terms of technology. You'd get people saying "this isn't what the Federation looked like in Nemesis! Why change things?! This isn't Star Trek!"
So, again, you go with what makes fistfuls of money, and that is TOS era trek.
If we did a modern take of post-Nemesis Trek, there would be some significant updates. Nemesis, while looking good for a Trek film, is quite outdated in terms of even basic technology. It has been 15 years since then, and a great many things have changed just in terms of technology. You'd get people saying "this isn't what the Federation looked like in Nemesis! Why change things?! This isn't Star Trek!"
So, again, you go with what makes fistfuls of money, and that is TOS era trek.
It matters if you want a sense of continuity if you ever sit down and do a series by series chronological order rewatch.I dunno, the 1990s Klingons do look cheap and campy to me, with the long-haired Heavy Metal fan aesthetic.
I don't like the new look much either (see my post in the other thread), I just don't think it really matters a whole lot.
You hug him, I want to keep all of my body parts.Really? Whatever is going on with his nose bridge actually impairing his sight makes me want to burst out in laughter. He looks so sad, maybe he needs a hug.
That's what it comes down to. We may love Star Trek for it's optimism, science fiction setting, fun characters, and stories, but CBS/P is in this for lots of cash. I'm fine with that, because more cash means more Star Trek, but that's the heart of it. I think people will just need to make room, if they really want to be a part of Trek's future. I know that I, for one, can love the original series, and still be stoked about the Abrams films. I know that I can eagerly await Discovery because it's new, fresh Star Trek that plans on tackling new concepts while playing in the same sandbox as the original series (to some degree). It's there, if people really want to enjoy it.I disagree. It's waaaay easier to explain why things look different in the future rather than inserting them awkwardly in the past. I think you are over stating the complains from fans if they did that. But I do agree with your interpretation of the business model . Having this series connected to branding icons of a Kirk or Spock is probably why they are doing it this way.
Plus shows set early on don't give off the impression that you have to watch anything beforehand. A post Voyager series might give the new viewer the impression that they had to watch the existing shows first, whether that's actually the case or not. The last thing they want is to limit the audience to those who were still watching Voyager come the end. For similar reasons the trailer makes no mention of Enterprise.I disagree. It's waaaay easier to explain why things look different in the future rather than inserting them awkwardly in the past. I think you are over stating the complains from fans if they did that. But I do agree with your interpretation of the business model . Having this series connected to branding icons of a Kirk or Spock is probably why they are doing it this way.
Nope.It matters if you want a sense of continuity if you ever sit down and do a series by series chronological order rewatch.
Yeah I would pretty not call those complete designs. Just certain Klingons having different features, much like humans do. You can tell they are the same species. The Discovery Klingons look like a whole new alien race.TOS*
TMP*
TSFS/STV
TNG and later TV series adapted the TSFS look with heavier brow ridges, more hair.
TUC returned to less pronounced ridges and a leather aesthetic
ST09*
STID
Where asterisk denotes a total redesign. They've probably got more different looks than any other single Trek species.
This. Too much adherence to canon weighs a series down. Discovery gets to be set in the TOS prime timeline, while also making new forays into stories and concepts untouched during that era.Plus shows set early on don't give off the impression that you have to watch anything beforehand. A post Voyager series might give the new viewer the impression that they had to watch the existing shows first, whether that's actually the case or not. The last thing they want is to limit the audience to those who were still watching Voyager come the end. For similar reasons the trailer makes no mention of Enterprise.
You can tell they are the same species. The Discovery Klingons look like a whole new alien race
Dude, again. Explained in-universe.ok if you say so. They look far closer in design to Klingons in the TNG era and in the JJ films than they do to TOS Klingons to me, but you're happy to accept those as looking like the same species. I don't know what to tell you.
So before that episode of Enterprise aired, you didn't accept Klingons from TMP onwards as the same species?Dude, again. Explained in-universe.
I don't think they are untouchable but I think the new look they got after "TOS" became iconic much like the Vulcans having pointy ears means you basically should just be doing minor changes and making the forehead pieces look better. The new look IMO seems to far of a change for a prime universe setting. They do look better than that old photo we all saw so that is something.So what makes the Klingons in particular untouchable? As an element that's already been thoroughly redesigned several times, they seem ripe for changes.
In-universe, outside the universe, doesn't matter. It's still trying to cover for a glaring change.Dude, again. Explained in-universe.
Yes. Really. It really is totally the same thing.CorporalCaptain, really? It's not the same thing at all.
That's cool, come back in 30 years and see if they explain this oneDude, again. Explained in-universe.
Sure, they could toss that out there, but why would they, or should they? It's not important. It's a cosmetic change for a production created for the 21st century.What if this will explain the reverting to the ridges look after TOS? I mean thank to those ancient Klingons (let's presume we have this Klingons but also smooth headed ones too) they can genetically revert to the ridges in 2 decades ... Just in time for TMP
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.