That's fair. I just thought he had explained it, but walking away works too
Kelvin Timeline all but confirmed
- Thread starter captainkirk
- Start date
That's fair. I just thought he had explained it, but walking away works too
He may of, I ignored any comment after that and had planned to give it a few hours to cool off before I checked it. If I did him wrong, I shall apologize
Hey, you do you.
If I took this wrong, I apologize. I did not insult you or mean it to come off as an insult if you took it as one. For that I apologize
Captain Stubing is a lot of people, and you argue any side of him being more dominant than any other.
When we see the flared trousers (pants for you folks across the dirty pond), the glitter ball and the dancing in the mess hall then we will know for certain
The Great Tribble War. The Klingons lose, the Tribbles won
And the Klingons were all forced to change their appearance to avoid the shame.
But that wasn't mentioned in TOS.
Maybe that's why the DSC Klingons don't have long hair, moustaches and beards? They had to give all their facial hair to the Tribbles as war reparations.
It was if you count "Trials and Tribblelations" as a TOS episode.
Fuller didn't say it was based on TOS specifically just mentioned in Trek before.
If they decide because of this show NEVER to return to stories in the Star Trek Prime Universe 24th and 25th centuries, I'll be ECSTATIC!
Setting Discovery as a prequel suggests to me that we are very unlikely ever to return to the future we knew in the TNG era. This was the last opportunity, in my eye, to see that time period. This will be Star Trek from here on out. Although I was for a 25th century series early on if for no other reason than avoiding these constant arguments about canon, it's probably for the best to let that era stay closed now.
I think the opposite. The success of discovery may cause them to say "what else can we do?" And someone should be pushing for Star Trek:Titan. It takes place after Nemesis freeing up a lot of cannon issues
I think Jonathan Frakes is a little too old to be the lead, but I would love to see him guest star as Riker in a late 24th century/early 25th century series, possibly as a recurring Admiral Riker.
That is, if DSC actually is a success. If it is not, that's the last we'll see of ST on the small screen for quite some time.
OMG no.
There's a future of trek discussion where I talked about doing Star Trek Titan but with an ensemble of junior officers like the TNG episode "Lower Decks"
Why so down on Star Trek Titan it seems like the next logical series post Nemesis.
It seems boring and uninspired. Why not something brand new? No Captain Riker, Captain Worf, or Captain anyone else we've seen a thousand times. Something fresh and new, with a new cast and no shackles to the Berman era. Frakes is 64, older than Shatner was when he retired Kirk, he's not going to be leading any new Trek series.
I agree, but I think that's less the case now than it was 10-15 years ago, especially since the series has gone in other directions in that time. I think at this point, the best way to start off a series on the Titan would be with Riker handing over command to the next captain. And I haven't read the novels, so I have no idea how they've handled any of this.
Similar threads
